Trunked System Naming Ambiguity

Status
Not open for further replies.

N4LX

Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
75
Reaction score
15
Location
Happy Valley, OR
I notice that there are literally dozens of trunked systems of various flavors, all operated by Mobile Communications America, in the database -- many of them having some degree of ambiguity and consistency to their naming. I've listed below all such systems that I have found so far -- it is by no means a complete list. Many of them have exactly the same name (some even in the same state or area).


Would it be feasible to apply a consistent naming pattern to disambiguate these systems, reduce confusion and make finding a given system in the database morestraightforward? Perhaps the major problem is with wiki integration -- all systems named simply "Mobile Communications America" now link to this wiki article although it pertains only to this individual system. If every system were given a unique, unambiguous name, each would automatically link to its own wiki page.

For instance, the first few systems in the list above might be given names like these (with most ambiguous terms at left and least ambiguous at right):

  • Mobile Communications America Alabama LTR
  • Mobile Communications America Tallahassee LTR
  • Mobile Communications America Madison lTR
  • Mobile Communications America Jacksonville Cap+
  • Mobile Communications America Tampa Cap+

I don't know if this falls under the heading of comment, suggestion or request but believe it to be worth noting. I realize it would be no trivial endeavor, though it could conceivably save time and trouble somewhere down the road. Food for thought, for what it's worth.
 

jim202

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
2,736
Reaction score
133
Location
New Orleans region
It is very clear that the information your posting is all from one company. The locations are different to provide where the systems are located. After the location is the type of system that is in use.

Like you posted LTR. That is indicating the type of system in use is LTR. Another type you posted is CAP+. This is a Motorola Capacity Plus system.

Not sure I can be of much more help to you on this issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top