USFS Chequamegon Nicolet

DVINTHEHOUSEMAN

Up North
Joined
Sep 14, 2021
Messages
269
Location
North of Hwy 8
Today I was monitoring the USFS Chequamegon-Nicolet frequency (170.4625) and heard one person calling another and said that they tried reaching them on "Tac" and "Com 1".

Also, on the wiki page, a repeater net is listed on a different pair that looks similar in structure to 170.4625, but I haven't heard a peep.

Does anyone know what Tac or Com 1 is and if the 168.750 repeater net is used?
 

ecps92

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2002
Messages
14,835
Location
Taxachusetts
Today I was monitoring the USFS Chequamegon-Nicolet frequency (170.4625) and heard one person calling another and said that they tried reaching them on "Tac" and "Com 1".

Also, on the wiki page, a repeater net is listed on a different pair that looks similar in structure to 170.4625, but I haven't heard a peep.

Does anyone know what Tac or Com 1 is and if the 168.750 repeater net is used?
Many of the Common and TAC channels are issued/assigned thru NIFC and likely listed at

What is listed in the wiki is/was built around the data known back in 2012, which has likely changed substantially but no one local has edited the Wiki

What Tone were you getting on 170.4625??

Also the UHF listed in the RRDB as Common is/was likely used as a LINK and not the actual Com1 you are looking for which should be VHF
 
Last edited:

DVINTHEHOUSEMAN

Up North
Joined
Sep 14, 2021
Messages
269
Location
North of Hwy 8
The output tone I was getting is 123.0. I wasn't monitoring the UHF frequency, but it is likely just a link. I will add NIFC Tac 1 and Com 1 to my radios and see if I hear anything, although with my distance from the Ino repeater, which seems to be the repeater of choice, I probably won't hear much.
 

es93546

A Member Twice
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Messages
1,220
Location
Right Side of CA on maps
Today I was monitoring the USFS Chequamegon-Nicolet frequency (170.4625) and heard one person calling another and said that they tried reaching them on "Tac" and "Com 1".

Also, on the wiki page, a repeater net is listed on a different pair that looks similar in structure to 170.4625, but I haven't heard a peep.

Does anyone know what Tac or Com 1 is and if the 168.750 repeater net is used?

Both the Southern (R8) and Eastern (R9) Regions of the U.S. Forest Service share a common tactical frequency of 166.5625 and it might carry a label of "Tac 1" on that forest. Most of the time it carries the label, "R9 Tac" and "R8 Tac" in the frequency lists I've looked at. The Chequamegon-Nicolet NF is in R9.

There are two federal government wide tactical frequencies of 163.7125 and 168.6125 (of a set of 4) which are often the tactical frequencies used by both National Forests and National Parks. That gives you 3 frequencies you are not likely scanning right now and I'm betting it is one of the fed. government wide frequencies. NIFC Tac 1 and Command 1 will not be what is being referred to, those are reserved for Type I and Type 2 incident management team use only, such as a large wildland fire or other type of emergency such as a hurricane or tornado with widespread damage.

There is one other possibility and that is the authorization of a unique frequency for that National Forest alone. I'm not sure they have enough radio traffic to justify that. If the above 3 don't work then you would have to search the federal agency VHF-High frequency range of 166.5000 to 169.5000. That range is reserved for tactical frequencies.

My Dad grew up in southwest Wisconsin. The family would refer to northern Wisconsin and northern Minnesota as "God's Country." Like I haven't heard that very often during my U.S. Forest Service career!😒 I spent more than half of my career in the eastern Sierra Nevada of California. My retort to someone making that assertion was "that might be, but right here in the Sierra Nevada, is where God spends his vacations!"😁😎
 

es93546

A Member Twice
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 18, 2020
Messages
1,220
Location
Right Side of CA on maps
P.S. The C-N NF will not be on the 168.7500 frequency you mentioned. The USFS is one agency that has made itself compliant with the 2019 federal government VHF High frequency allocation/authorizations. Simplified it is 162.0000-166.5000 repeater inputs, 166.5000-169.5000 simplex and 169.5000-173.9875 repeater outputs. The Department of the Interior agencies: NPS, BLM, USFWS and BIA haven't moved all that far to being in compliance.
 
Top