Using Truck AM/FM Antenna for Scanner

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tinkertek

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
39
Location
Palmer, MA
Hi Everyone,

So, I finally saved enough money to buy myself a brand new 2015 Ford F-150 truck. Of course, I immediately had to install a scanner in it. I bought a Home Patrol 2 (because it's so much smaller than my old BC780XLT) and mounted it on top of the dashboard in the little tray. So I've been thinking about the antenna for quite some time. After experimenting with loads of different antennas over the years, in many different vehicles, I decided to try and utilize the existing stock 31" AM/FM rod antenna on the front fender.

After following the coax (behind the glovebox), I located the Orange coax coming from the antenna. I noticed Ford used a very strange fitting I've never seen before. It is inline and sort of allows the coax to/from to rotate infinitely. At first I thought maybe it was a quick disconnect, though I couldn't get it apart. Anyway I digress, I cut into the Orange coax and installed F connectors on both ends. I then used a special coupler from Antenna Specialists that accepts an input from the antenna and has an output for the scanner and an output for the stereo. This coupler has the old style Motorola jacks and plugs that new vehicles don't use anymore. Anyway, after cutting off those Motorola connectors and installing F connectors, it is working.

I'm sure that I've got huge impedance mismatches, as the little jumpers hanging from that coupler use a very odd coax, with a stranded center conductor. Also, I think the Orange coax may have had an air dielectric, rather than foam (or maybe it was another lead on the coupler). Anyways this mess all fell apart, because I didn't have the correct size F connectors to fit on RG58 50 ohm. My fittings were designed for RG59 75 ohm (I know another impedance mismatch).

Anyway, I threw the coupler away and it's ridiculous odd coax hanging from it. I then installed a standard 2-way splitter rated for 5 MHz to 1 Ghz. I'm back in business now. So the scanner works ok, stereo works ok, no big noticeable loss in FM stereo reception. The 800 MHz signals are fairly weak and I'm looking to improve on them. So, I had an old Radio Shack scanner broadband antenna laying around. The kind with the 2 black coils in it. So I fabricated a stud onto the bottom of it and was able to screw it into the existing AM/FM mount. The 800 MHz reception improved somewhat, but this killed my FM stereo reception pretty badly. So who's got ideas on how to modify that whip with the 2 black coils, to I orove 800 MHz, but at the same time not destroy 100 MHz for the FM? I wonder if the center piece of whip between the 2 coils is the 100 MHz (vhf-hi portion of the antenna) ?
 

Tinkertek

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
39
Location
Palmer, MA
I'm aware that the formula for a 1/4 wave whip (in inches) is (234/[Freq in MHz]) x 12. However, since the Radio Shack whip has 2 coils in it, all bets are off with that formula. For now I put the original 31" whip back in. Thoughts?
 

toastycookies

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
726
Location
the far east
Is there a reason you decided to try to use the OEM FM antenna to begin with? are you trying for a stealth install or something?

If not I would just go with seperate antennas.
It would make things a lot more simple.

If you want to go with the "stealth" install and use a single antenna for both your broadcast radio and your scanner you are going to get decreased results with both and need to pick one to sacrifice more on.
 

marksmith

Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2007
Messages
4,332
Location
Anne Arundel County, MD
Trying to get one antenna to get "everything" isn't gonna work very well as toasty cookies indicates, especially if you want to listen to 800mz on the scanner and 90-106 mz on the radio. I would leave the truck radio with the initial setup that was there and put a mag mount on for the scanner with an 800mz antenna.

Mark
536/996P2/HP1e/HP2e/996XT/
396XT/PSR800/PRO668/PRO652
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
23,898
Location
Roaming the Intermountain West
Our chiefs car is "low profile" and uses an XTL2500 VHF and the stock AM/FM antenna. There is a special box you can purchase from one of the big companies that will replace the existing AM/FM coax from the antenna, to the matching box, to the VHF and the AM/FM radio. It works OK on VHF, but I wouldn't expect it to work on 800MHz for TX.
Even at best, this is a compromise.

Reusing/splitting the AM/FM radio might work on VHF, but you will see very poor performance elsewhere.

Dedicated antennas will always work best. Anything else is a compromise.

I'd remove the splitter and reconnect the stock antenna to the AM/FM radio.
Get a dedicated scanner antenna. Either mount it off the right side fender opposite the AM/FM antenna, or mount one right in the middle of the cab roof. Since the 2015 F-150's have an aluminum body, you won't get away with a mag mount. You'll need to install a permanent mount NMO. It will really improve performance.
 

Tinkertek

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
39
Location
Palmer, MA
Trying not to put holes in the all aluminum body of the brand new truck. Also, don't want to call attention/thieves to it, with an extra antenna. It certainly is a compromise, I'll try out the existing 31" stock antenna for a week and take it from there. I have a box full of old antennas I used in past vehicles. The reception really is not that much worse than a dedicated antenna, the only thing is the 800 MHz stuff is definitely noticeably worse. Seems that will be tough to correct.
 

popnokick

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
2,842
Location
Northeast PA
After years of experimenting with AM-FM antenna couplers and suction cup wire antennas... I found that this antenna is best when -
- You want no holes on the vehicle
- You want something OUTSIDE the vehicle (always)
- You want broadband coverage that includes decent 800 mHz
- You want a reasonable price
- You don't want to affect your AM / FM reception
- You have an untinted unobstructed spot on your windshield as near to the top center as possible (although mine is mounted on my Jeep near the passenger window post on the front windshield and still works very well)
Tram 1199 Glass Mount All-Band Scanner Antenna - Walmart.com
Link above is to Walmart, but Amazon has 'em too. Tram 1199 is tough to beat when all the above are true. Tried Radio Shack version but had them fall off... twice. My current Tram 1199 has been going strong for 4+ years now.
 

JStemann

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 17, 2004
Messages
503
Location
SE Indiana
You might try out this one: SpectrumForce Wideband Antenna with Mag Mount and SMA

It doesn't look very impressive but, I have used them temporarily on vehicles until I could get around to my final install. They do surprisingly well on vhf, uhf and 800. They look a lot like a cell antenna. Oh, I almost forgot about the aluminum. These are small enough you should be able to "glue" the antenna down with some rtv silicone (automotive type). That should hold it on there and not damage the paint or body and it'll still be removable.

Jeff
 

FFPM571

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Messages
1,716
Location
Nashvillle
Our chiefs car is "low profile" and uses an XTL2500 VHF and the stock AM/FM antenna. There is a special box you can purchase from one of the big companies that will replace the existing AM/FM coax from the antenna, to the matching box, to the VHF and the AM/FM radio. It works OK on VHF, but I wouldn't expect it to work on 800MHz for TX.
Even at best, this is a compromise.

.

That set up is made by Sti-co and replaces the factory AM/FM antenna with a tuned antenna for the frequency bands you are using. The splitter box matches the inpedence so the AM/FM radio can still be used. I have installed hundreds of them and we have no probems in VHF or the UHF/VHF dual band used by the 3 letter agencies I do work for.
 

popnokick

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
2,842
Location
Northeast PA
The Sti-Co covert antennas are BEAUTIFUL, and you can transmit with them as well. As with most things of high performance and beauty, they come at a very dear price. At $350-$450 apiece depending on the model of vehicle and coverage of antenna, you might find yourself reconsidering some of the factors vs. drilling a hole or using thru-the-glass antenna. Sti-Co makes a glass mount antenna as well, and so does Larsen.
 

wulf03

Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Messages
22
I cant stand the music, news or out right lies on broadcast radio so it was simple for me, Tore the radio out and simply hooked on with the moto radioshack connector. Haven't tried a splitter yet to run more than one scanner but should work great. Get a perfect signal and a good on the go signal also.
 

Halfpint

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2004
Messages
949
Location
Slightly NE of the People's Republic of Firestone
I've been using the 'stock' 'automotive' antenna for my scanners for years now and have't noted any problems receiving any of the various freqs I've dealt with over those years. I've got a splitter in all four of our trucks, SWMBO's Fairlane 2door sedan, our Falcon Stationwagon, the Explorer, and SWMBO's LR3 and they all seem to receive the same. (The LR3's antenna is a little 'Dome' mounted back by the tailgate and even though I'd originally figured I'd have most of my reception from the front I have not noticed all that much directionality. It actually appears that the LR3s reception is actually less directional than the other vehicles'.)
 

DJ11DLN

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
2,068
Location
Mudhole, IN
I've been using the 'stock' 'automotive' antenna for my scanners for years now and have't noted any problems receiving any of the various freqs I've dealt with over those years. I've got a splitter in all four of our trucks, SWMBO's Fairlane 2door sedan, our Falcon Stationwagon, the Explorer, and SWMBO's LR3 and they all seem to receive the same. (The LR3's antenna is a little 'Dome' mounted back by the tailgate and even though I'd originally figured I'd have most of my reception from the front I have not noticed all that much directionality. It actually appears that the LR3s reception is actually less directional than the other vehicles'.)

I've tried it too, sometimes successfully, sometimes not. Not all stock antennas worked well, some didn't work at all, some worked just fine. Back when everything here was VHF/UHF, I tried this with one car where I'd been using a trunk lip mount 3-band RS whip that had some pretty hot reviews, and in fact I was pretty happy with its performance...the broadcast band whip on the car actually kicked the trunk mount's butt, even when split to the AM/FM radio and not using the right co-ax.:cool: The thing is, you never know until you try. And sometimes something that shouldn't work, does. When it does, you just hit the jackpot, you don't have to drill a hole or try to keep something adhesive stuck to your window or hassle with a mag-mount. You also don't have quite as much in the way of worries about thieves snatching your scanner, since there's no antenna to give away its presence.

But you have to try it to find out. Getting advice, here and even elsewhere, is well and good, but that's the only way you will ever know.

Nowadays when I try it, I run RG8x from the antenna direct to the scanner. And it is and always has been a Hail Mary/YMMV thing. I don't listen to the radio anymore, nothing on there that my old ears would class as music...I use it as an amp for the scanner's audio.;)
 

N3JI

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
98
Location
Dallas-Ft. Worth
I know this isn't a solution to what you're trying to do, but are you scanning VHF/UHF along with 850? I actually don't because all the agencies around me moved to 850. My solution was an on-glass 850 only antenna which has been working VERY well for me. And a truck with a small on-glass antenna on the top passenger-side of the windshield is pretty low-profile, IMHO. I would think that the odd radio antenna with extra coils in it might actually DRAW atention... I also have a very similar 850 MHz mag-mount that I put on work vehicles as needed. These are (I think) 1/2 over 1/4 wave antennas that actually have a little gain as well. BTW, I know the mag-mount won't work on the new 150s... ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top