Whitley COunty in Crisis

Status
Not open for further replies.

ShawnCowden

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
843
Location
London, Kentucky
Whitley co public safety is going into crisis, EMS, SHERIFF SERVICES

maybe corbin-knox ems and laurel co ems can help if whitley co ems goes out Also whitley co jail is closing its doors!!!

Also maybe ksp, williamsburg pd and corbin pd can help the county sheriff out if they need more help. Mountain lifeline was the ems medic service before the county took over. maybe they can get rural-metro or a private ems to come in and help that area. The future is unknown for whitley county. Also knox co has taken hits with fd and sheriff depts
 

ShawnCowden

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
843
Location
London, Kentucky
Whitley County, Kentucky could soon lose nearly half its Sheriff's Department. That would leave only five deputies patrolling a county of 37,000 people.

Deputy Sheriff Glen Bunch has worked in law enforcement for 14 years. He has a wife and three kids, but in a few days, he may not have a job.

"My understanding is the 20th will be myself and three other deputies' last day," said Bunch.

Sheriff Lawrence Hodge says he was told Tuesday he would have to run his department without the $107,000 he was budgeted from the county.

"Some of my deputies have been here over 12 years, and I think this will be the fourth time they've been laid off. It seems to always come down to the emergency services that have to pay the bill for everybody else," said Hodge.

Hodge says he will have to lay off four deputies and the rest of the staff will lose their health insurance. The sheriff says it will cost a deputy more than $600 a month to replace a family policy. Subtract that from their pay and it is less than minimum wage.

"Who's going to go out here and risk their life daily for minimum wage, I mean, it's not going to happen," said Hodge.

But it is not just the deputies who will be affected.

"At 3:00 in the morning if someone is kicking down your door, when you call 911, do you want to have that thought in your mind, is there a law enforcement officer out there to respond to my call?" said Bunch.

Deputy Bunch says he is disappointed with the county he was born and raised in for not fixing the problem before it came to this. He says he will finish off this week, and then he will look for a new job.
 

ShawnCowden

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
843
Location
London, Kentucky
UPDATE: WHITLEY CO SHERIFF AND EMS POSSIBLE CLOSE

Whitley County government faces possible shut-down

Whitley County Magistrates voted down a payroll tax.



Sheriff Lawrence Hodge has already laid off four deputies and may have to lay-off more.



Executive Judge Mike Patrick said county government will shut down without more money.



Magistrate Johnny Lawson voted against the payroll tax.


E-mail This Article
Printable Version
Increase Type Size
Decrease Type Size
Make WBIR your home page
Headlines available in RSS format

A vote in Whitley County on Friday puts its residents one step closer to losing their sheriff's department and ambulance service.

The Whitley County Sheriff's Department serves more than 35,000 people and covers almost 450 square miles. For the past three weeks, they have been operating with only five deputies.

"We've got four laid off, but it looks like soon down the road the whole department will be laid off," said Whitley County Sheriff Lawrence Hodge.

That is because they are running out of money in the county budget.

"I'm very concerned that we will end up in a position where we will not be able to function as a government. We won't be able to continue services, or maintain services to our citizens," said Whitley County Judge Executive Mike Patrick.

The county's fiscal year starts July first, and if they do not get more money essential services could be cut.

"Lives may be in the balance here," said Patrick.

The judge executive proposed a county payroll tax that the sheriff was hoping for to keep his department alive. But the magistrates voted it down.

"We're unsure where it's going to go. We're going to have to have a few more special meetings before June the 30th before we can make that final decision," said Whitley County Magistrate Johnny Lawson.

"What are they waiting on? Let's fix it. We've got people laid off, people in the county's out here suffering," said Hodge.

For now, Patrick says they will have to start planning to cut employees' health insurance and get ready for more lay-offs, if not a complete shut-down.

"We gotta try to work our way and continue to work our way out of this," said Patrick.

Patrick says he will call a special meeting of the magistrates next week. He says he will have to lay off all county employees if something does not change before the first of July.

I wonder who will take over ems ops. and i do think corbin pd and williamsburg pd will have to help ksp in whitley co ???

your take folks ???


source wbir tv in knoxville tennessee
http://www.wbir.com/news/news.aspx?storyid=26372
 

ShawnCowden

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
843
Location
London, Kentucky
VIA CORBIN NEWS JOURNAL:

Imagine calling 911 because your sick grandmother needs an ambulance ride to the hospital, only to have no one answer the phone at the 911 center because all the employees were laid off, and to later find out that there were no ambulance drivers because they had all been told not to come to work either.

It's a scenario potentially facing Whitley County if the fiscal court doesn't pass a balanced budget by July 1, and as of a special meeting last week this hadn't been done.

"If we do not have a balanced budget, the fiscal court cannot write a check. Statutorily the county judge, and the county treasurer would be in the courthouse, but we can't pay for anything, and we can't be paid," Patrick said. "We can't work people that we cannot pay that means that every employee that is paid directly by the fiscal court, will have to be told on June 30, don't report to work on July 1.

"We are getting into a situation in my opinion where lives can come into jeopardy. When you start considering total shutdown, you may affect somebody's life that scares me."

Cordell Lawrence, Deputy Commissioner for the Governor's Office of Local Development, said if the county doesn't have a balanced budget by July 1, then the state will sue Whitley County. The office will go to circuit court to seek an injunction requiring the fiscal court to go back into session until a balanced budget is passed.

"Really the ball is in the hands of the fiscal court to take an action between now and June 30," Lawrence said. "By June 30, we will then file a lawsuit in circuit court to call them into special session to approve the budget. We (the state) don't take over operation. It just shuts down, basically all services."

The circuit judge would have some latitude in ordering that some or all employees could report back to work, such as 911, and ambulance workers, Lawrence added.



Court deadlocked

During a special called meeting Friday morning, the fiscal court deadlocked over whether to implement a 1 percent occupational or payroll tax with Judge-Executive Mike Patrick and Magistrate Burley Foley voting to approve the first reading of the tax, and Magistrates Johnny Lawson and Wayne Wilson voting against it.

Magistrate Nolan Bird didn't show up for Thursday's meeting.

It was the second time in nearly three weeks that fiscal court members had failed to implement a proposed payroll tax, which the county treasurer and members of the Governor's Office for Local Development say is the only way the county can balance its budget, pay off a deficit from this year, which totals over $800,000, and not make drastic cuts to services.

"We've worked every scenario, and the only way to do it is to increase revenue," Lawrence said. "Even in cutting all the insurance that you mentioned, and ambulance service, and 911, and other what I call basic services, there is still not sufficient revenue to offset the expense of the other basic services that you are offering. It is a tough decision to be made."

"We went through 20 different versions of the budget trying to look at it from different angles for a caretaker government," said County Treasurer Jeff Gray. "Even if the court was to shut down all non-essential services or non-mandated services, we still cannot have a balanced budget due to the debt service of the county."

Three weeks ago, Patrick told fiscal court members that even if a payroll tax was passed, the county would have to cut one ambulance service crew, eliminate health insurance for county workers, and cut $107,000 in funding for the sheriff's department in order to balance the budget for the coming fiscal year, which starts July 1.

Patrick told court members Friday that he has spoken with the bank, which agreed to allow the county to pay back the money over a three-year period, and that the state has agreed not to fight the proposal.

By paying the money back over three years time, Patrick said the county will still be able to provide insurance for employees and not have to cut funding for the sheriff's department or ambulance service providing that the county pays a 1 percent payroll tax.

"We can't do any of that without an occupational tax. It is still required to do it," Patrick said.

Because county officials didn't pass the payroll tax Friday, fiscal court members tabled the remainder of items on the agenda for the meeting, including consideration of the budget ordinance, which was written up based upon the payroll tax being approved.



What now

Patrick said there is still time for the county to implement a payroll tax before July 1, but that given the matter has died twice, the county has to consider other options.

Patrick said Friday that he's not sure where the county goes from here, but that he planned to try and put together a bare bones budget for a caretaker government, and that he hoped to call a special meeting for this week so the fiscal court could consider it.

"I'm skeptical we can put together a budget that doesn't have an occupational tax, and somehow balances," Patrick said. "I'm skeptical that we can do that, and have a budget that is accepted by Frankfort. We will have to start looking at cutting back health insurance, employees, whatever it takes to make the budget acceptable to the state. We have to present that then to the court, and say is this the way to go.

"Failing that, then I think we need to take a serious look at what we need to do as of July 1 as far as what I consider is basically shutting the county government down, and be prepared to go into those meetings as ordered by the court."

Patrick said the county has 100 employees, whose jobs are in limbo.

"How long are they going to be in limbo? I don't know. It takes people to perform the services. If I don't have any ambulance drivers, how can I run the ambulances. If I only have one driver and I only have three ambulances, how do I do it," Patrick asked. "What happens if we have a storm, and a tornado comes through. If I can't work the road crew, how can people get out."

If the government shuts down July 1, Patrick said he will be still be at work, even if he can't pay himself.

Patrick said Friday that there are still a lot of questions that he doesn't have answers to, such as what to do with 200 prisoners at the jail if the county has to shutdown.

Even if the county were to pass the first reading of payroll tax ordinance, the ordinance will have to be advertised for seven days prior to having a second meeting where it can be approved.

Patrick said even if the county has a special meeting to approve the first reading of the ordinance this week, it will still be difficult, but not impossible to get the second reading passed before July 1.



Why the 'No' votes

Wilson said he voted against the payroll tax ordinance because the first time he saw it was 10 minutes prior to the last meeting where he voted against it.

"How do you expect me to make an intelligent decision about anything without knowing what is going on," Wilson said. "I've had time to look it over since then. I realize myself that we owe it to the taxpayers to look at everything before we go for something like this."

Wilson said when he ran for office, he didn't promise people anything other than he wouldn't vote for any new taxes.

"I felt like I sort of obligated myself. I can't vote for it," he said.

Wilson admits that he doesn't have any better ideas for balancing the county's budget short of a payroll tax right now.

"I can't honestly say I do," Wilson said. "I think we ought to explore every option. I think we owe that to the tax payers."

When asked the same question, Lawson replied, "We talked about two other things, but I don't know if they can be done or not. These people from the governor's office were asked to come by the judge to overlook, and see what we can do. They were not sent."

Lawson said he wants to see where the money from a payroll tax would go, and what portions of the tax that Corbin and Williamsburg would get.

Patrick said the answer to those questions were in the budget.

Because Whitley County has a population of at least 30,000 people, it is limited by law to passing only a 1 percent payroll tax. Because of those population figures, under state law, Corbin and Williamsburg could then pass their own payroll tax, which would come out of the county's share. This assumes that the county doesn't work out an agreement with the cities to give them a certain percentage of the occupation tax.

"The cities haven't even been talked to about what kind of percentage they would get of this money," Lawson said. "We're not sure where it is going to go. We are going to have to have a few more special meetings before June 30 before we can make that final decision."

Lawson said at this point he doesn't plan to vote for the payroll tax.

Wilson and Lawson said they still want to look into selling some surplus property.

Patrick told magistrates Friday morning that the county had found about 80 to 100 acres of land it owns in the Ky. 92 area, which is divided up into three tracts of land, but that two of the tracts have deed restrictions, and he isn't sure whether the county could sell the land.

Fiscal court members unanimously agreed Friday to table discussion on the matter until this month's regularly scheduled meeting, which is set for next Tuesday, in order to give the county attorney more time to research the matter.



What can't be done

Patrick said the county doesn't have the option of implementing a local sales tax, or a tax on utilities as some in the community have suggested.

The county only has three options available to increase revenue, which includes a property tax, which is already in place, an insurance tax, which couldn't be implemented this year because the deadline for doing so has already passed, and implementation of a payroll tax, Lawrence said.

"A sales tax is currently not an option. I know there have been proposals through the General Assembly to make that a local option, but it is still at this stage still a proposal to implement a sales tax at a local level," Lawrence added.



Last time it happened

Lawrence said the last time that the state had to sue a county in circuit court to make them pass a budget was about seven years ago in Breathitt County.

It took fiscal court members about 15 days to pass a budget, and implement a payroll tax.

State officials said Lawrence County is doing very well financially since passing the tax.

Lonnie Campbell, an assistant director in the Governor's Office for Local Development, said the circuit judge in Lawrence County ruled that the courthouse could stay open, and that the county clerk could collect taxes, but it would be up to a local circuit judge to make that determination.

Because Circuit Judge Jerry Winchester is the father of County Attorney Paul Winchester, all cases concerning the county are handled by Circuit Judge Paul Braden.



How it happened

Campbell said the fiscal court is currently facing a deficit of over $1 million due to a variety of reasons.

"The real reason it has happened is because there have been a tremendous amount of jail costs," Campbell said. "Other areas have gone up to0. As you heard today, insurance is going up. Employee retirement is going up. The jail is a big issue, and it is an issue all over the state. Jails are just expensive.

"There are no jails out there making money. You've had to borrow money to operate it. Basically, you all have been borrowing money just to run operating expenses, that will catch up to you."

Campbell said this is basically the equivalent of a person using their credit card to pay for monthly expenses, and then maxing out that credit card.

Unlike individuals or businesses, the county can't declare bankruptcy.

Patrick declined to elaborate on how the county got in such a financial predicament.

"Our problem is how do we get from here that is the real problem we are facing right now," Patrick said.



Tax would bring deputies back

Sheriff Lawrence Hodge has already laid off four of his deputies and one secretary because the fiscal court announced plans to cut $107,000 out of his budget, which he said goes to pay those deputies salaries.

Had the fiscal court approved the payroll tax Friday, Hodge said he would have been able to bring his deputies back to work very quickly. Hodge said all he needs is the guarantee that the money will be coming.

"I don't think they have a choice but to pass the tax. What are they waiting on?" Hodge said. "Why make everybody suffer. I know one of them is kind of helping himself to run for jailer. This isn't the place for politics. I think he thinks this will help him, but this won't help him I promise."

In the event of a government shutdown, Hodge said that even though his office generates enough money to pay employees, he would still have to lay off all workers because the county pays social security and retirement benefits for employees, and he can't require them to work without their social security being paid.

"I guess the elected officials will be here, but what can one man do?" Hodge said. "I would think we would have to have the tax office open, but I don't know."



Clerk's office stays open

Even if most of county government shuts down, Whitley County Clerk Tom Rains said he would be able to keep his office open since it brings in enough fees to cover its own budget, but that it would be difficult.

Rains said he would have to pay for some supplies, which the fiscal court currently pays for his office, but that he's not sure how he would pay for the elections if the county wasn't back in business next year.

"That would be pretty tough for me to swallow that lick. Annually, it would be $80,000. I don't know if I could, but I would try. I might have to cut services to do that," Rains said.
 

ShawnCowden

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
843
Location
London, Kentucky
Magistrates could face criminal charges, removal for.......

VIA CORBIN NEWS JOURNAL

If Whitley County Fiscal Court members don't pass a budget by July 1 and the government has to shut down, then fiscal court members could be charged with malfeasance, and possibly could be removed from office. However, the department of corrections requiring the county to hire a jail administrator because they don't feel the jailer has run the jail very well, probably wouldn't meet the requirements for removing an elected official from office for malfeasance, according to Allen Trimble, who has served as Commonwealth's Attorney for the last 18 years.

"It has to be an intentional act in violation of a statute, then we have malfeasance," Trimble said.

If an elected county official willfully fails to carry out a duty, which is required by statute, then the offending party is subject to being charged with malfeasance or misfeasance of office.

Failing to implement a balanced budget by July 1, which is required by state law, could rise to the level of malfeasance of office, however, Trimble said he doesn't think this will happen.

"I don't suspect that would ever become an issue. I think that all the officials involved would take some action. I don't think any of them would intend to intentionally violate the statute. I think before it comes to that they would take what action is required," he added.

When asked whether someone should consider filing malfeasance charges against the fiscal court if the government shuts down, Whitley County Judge-Executive Mike Patrick said, "It will probably be something that could be considered. I'm not going to say that they wouldn't have a little justification. I don't think it is out of the realm of consideration."

Trimble said he thinks fiscal court members will get a balanced budget passed before the July 1 deadline, and that if they don't then the state would come in, and take over operation of the county.

Trimble said he thinks during that period of time, if the officials could be identified who didn't implement a balanced budget, then they could be subject to being charged with malfeasance.

In order to charge someone with malfeasance of office, the matter would have to be brought to the grand jury. The grand jury would then have to issue an indictment, and the matter would be tried in district court, Trimble said.

If convicted, an elected official would be fined between $100 and $1,000, and the office would be declared vacant.

"I think anybody would have the right to come to the grand jury, and the grand jury would consider it," Trimble said. "If they wanted to come to the grand jury, we would consider it. It doesn't have to be a law enforcement officer. It could be a citizen, but it would have to be a specific provable violation of a county official not doing something he was required by statute to do.

"Most of the time, if you find one of those failures, it is one of these things that they neglected to do. It is an oversight, and is corrected shortly after it is found. It is not a common thing to have happen. Most things that are not done can immediately be corrected by the official, who is doing it. In my opinion, once they do that, then I think they are purged of the crime.

"I think the statute is designed for the county official who is recalcitrant. He knows what he is supposed to do, but he doesn't do it, and refuses to do it, but the statutes clearly require him to do it."

In the case of the state ordering Whitley County to hire a jail administrator to oversee the facility, Trimble said he doesn't think this would rise to the level of malfeasance based on his understanding of the state's allegations against the jailer.

"The reason why is, as I understand it, they have charged him with various failings in the way he has maintained the jail, or conducts the jail activity that is more of a critique in job performance which is always subject to argument. The jailer has his side, and corrections has their side. Civil courts are meant to make those decisions, not criminal courts," Trimble said.

"From a criminal standpoint, it is very difficult to charge somebody with malfeasance because you claim they are not doing as good a job as they could be."

Trimble said if you had an instance where a police officer took a prisoner to the jail, and the jailer refused to accept the prisoner, or intentionally violated a judge's order, then that would be another matter.

"Then he would not be doing something that he was required to do, and that might be the subject of malfeasance, but because of the way he runs the jail and someone takes issue as to that, that is not really a malfeasance issue. It is when they intentionally fail to do something that the statutes require them to do that is where malfeasance comes into play," Trimble said.

"Not all county officials are the same. Some are better than others. Some do their jobs better than others, and it is not designed to remove an official that someone thinks is not doing the best job, or doing as good a job as they could. It is not meant for that. This statute is meant to remove that recalcitrant official that refuses to carry out statutory prescribed duties," Trimble said.

Trimble said state law is intentionally set up so that it is difficult to remove an elected official from office.

"It takes a lot to overcome the will of the people, so it takes a lot to remove a duly elected official from office," Trimble said. "Otherwise, you would have something going all the time. This is not to say any of this is politics, but the statutes are meant to keep politics out of malfeasance of office.

"The constitution of this state wants every public official to do what the law requires them to do. Sometimes they make a mistake and neglect it, but they correct it. This statute is meant for those officials, who will just adamantly not comply with the statute when they know what they are supposed to do, and they refuse to do it."




© 2005 by Corbin News Journal
Published 2005-06-15
Vol. 97, No. 24

 

ShawnCowden

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
843
Location
London, Kentucky
via corbin times tribune

Four deputies who were laid off from the Whitley County Sheriff's Department in mid-May returned to work on Thursday.




Deputies Brandon Prewitt, Glenn Bunch, Dennis Foley and Scott Lake all returned to the department following the Whitley County Fiscal Court's approval of the first reading of the county's budget.

Because the first reading of a 1 percent occupational tax also passed, the budget was able to included funding for the sheriff's department to pay the deputies' salaries.

"The (fiscal court) meeting was at 10 a.m.," Whitley County Sheriff Lawrence Hodge said. "They were at work at 3 p.m.


"Now we're back to where we were. Thank God."

The deputies were also pleased to be back to work.

"I'm relieved and happy to be back," Lake said. "Financially, I hope they get everything balanced and worked out."

Lake said he thought each of the deputies had been contacted by other agencies, but each was waiting to see what happened.

"It's just home for everyone," Lake said. "We were just waiting and hoping it all worked out."

Lake said the magistrates and the county judge-executive kept saying they were trying to work things out and trying to do what was best for the county.

"I kind of had a feeling it would work out," Lake said.

Within a week of the deputies being laid off, burglaries in Whitley County had skyrocketed. Hodge said before the layoffs the county was averaging about one burglary every eight days. In the first week after the lay offs, the department responded to 17 burglaries.

Hodge said that it would not have been hard to figure out where deputies were during the time of the lay offs because there was only one man per shift.

"You could put on a fake call or just find out which end of town the deputy is on and go rob the other end," Hodge said.

"With two (on duty), it's harder to figure out," he said.

In the days since the deputies have been back, Hodge said that the department has not worked a burglary.

Lake said that having more deputies per shift has allowed the county to be covered more efficiently.

"With only one man out, you feel like you have to stay close to the center of town in case you get a call," Lake said. "With two or more out, you can patrol the outskirts of the county."

Lake said when the cruisers are able to patrol a larger area, it acts as a deterrent because people are less likely to commit crimes when they see the deputies out.

Lake also said many people have commented to him about seeing the deputies back out.

"We've had lots of comments," he said. "People are happy to see us back in the area."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top