Why MARCS Tower Addresses Dropped

Status
Not open for further replies.

Swipesy

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
2,104
Location
Northern Ohio
I just noticed today that the specific MARCS System tower addresses have been eliminated from the RadioReference database. Why and who made that decision? Some of us use specific tower information and despite the towers being simulcast doesn't mean that some of us don't use that information in programming our scanners. More loss of transparency!
 

N2YQT

Ambulance Driver
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
177
Location
South Glens Falls, NY
I just noticed today that the specific MARCS System tower addresses have been eliminated from the RadioReference database. Why and who made that decision? Some of us use specific tower information and despite the towers being simulcast doesn't mean that some of us don't use that information in programming our scanners. More loss of transparency!

Did they erase it off the FCC license to?
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
Probably because with simulcast, it's impossible to only program one transmitter in the cell, because they all transmit the same signal on the same frequency. You're not going to get signal from just one location.
 

Swipesy

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
2,104
Location
Northern Ohio
Jon you are not correct. I happen to live at the fringe of 4 major P25 systems and I can only hear 1 tower for each system at my base station.
 

northernsummit

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 10, 2009
Messages
289
Location
Macedonia, Ohio
Probably because with simulcast, it's impossible to only program one transmitter in the cell, because they all transmit the same signal on the same frequency. You're not going to get signal from just one location.

Jon, I've actually built a yagi that I can swing 180 degrees and choose from three different transmitters. Knowing the physical location of each transmitter has it's benefits. If the OP is referring to the actual address of a transmitter those are public record. I suspect, clicking through to a couple of FCC licenses in the RRDB, that this may be a technical issue and not a conscious decision. I can find licenses under a given site, but if i click on them it's a dead link.
 

Swipesy

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
2,104
Location
Northern Ohio
Northernsummit you are correct that the exact tower location can be found outside the RR. My point is that you used to be able to click on the County for the System in RR and see the exact location of each tower, simulcast or not. You can see the location for non simulcast systems. Someone knocked out the simulcast locations without informing RR users such action was being taken.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,409
Location
VA
Jon you are not correct. I happen to live at the fringe of 4 major P25 systems and I can only hear 1 tower for each system at my base station.
You have no way of verifying that for simulcast, because all of the transmitters are on the same frequency. Even in a fringe area, you're usually getting a mix of signal from at least 2 transmitters.
 

eorange

♦RF Enabled Member♦
Joined
Aug 20, 2003
Messages
3,028
Location
Cleveland, OH
Unless of course you take a LSM-distortion-susceptible radio like a 396XT to an area where you are truly receiving signal from just one tower, and the LSM distortion suddenly goes away. I've done this as @northernsummit correctly points out, in multiple states no less.
 

Swipesy

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
2,104
Location
Northern Ohio
Jon, your response has nothing to do with my original post that simulcast tower sites addresses have been taken off RR. Start your own thread about your vast knowledge about simulcast.
 

northernsummit

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 10, 2009
Messages
289
Location
Macedonia, Ohio
Northernsummit you are correct that the exact tower location can be found outside the RR. My point is that you used to be able to click on the County for the System in RR and see the exact location of each tower, simulcast or not. You can see the location for non simulcast systems. Someone knocked out the simulcast locations without informing RR users such action was being taken.

I wasn't disputing that, I was just saying if they're publicly available I can't think of any reason to remove them. Is this what you're talking about? If I click on the Summit County site, and then click on a license under FCC Licenses, such as WNNE207 (or RadioReference.com) it takes me to a dead end.

Is that what you're looking at, or something else?
 

Swipesy

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2003
Messages
2,104
Location
Northern Ohio
I wasn't disputing that, I was just saying if they're publicly available I can't think of any reason to remove them. Is this what you're talking about? If I click on the Summit County site, and then click on a license under FCC Licenses, such as WNNE207 (or RadioReference.com) it takes me to a dead end.

Is that what you're looking at, or something else?
That is what I am referring to - yes.
 

ecps92

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2002
Messages
15,062
Location
Taxachusetts
Seems the RRDB is having issues, as I just tried it for my area and the links are DEAD as well [Non Ohio]

I wasn't disputing that, I was just saying if they're publicly available I can't think of any reason to remove them. Is this what you're talking about? If I click on the Summit County site, and then click on a license under FCC Licenses, such as WNNE207 (or RadioReference.com) it takes me to a dead end.

Is that what you're looking at, or something else?
 

kf8yk

Member
Joined
May 3, 2003
Messages
795
The RR FCC database has its ups and downs:



 

wa8pyr

Retired and playing radio whenever I want.
Staff member
Lead Database Admin
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
7,306
Location
Ohio
I just noticed today that the specific MARCS System tower addresses have been eliminated from the RadioReference database. Why and who made that decision? Some of us use specific tower information and despite the towers being simulcast doesn't mean that some of us don't use that information in programming our scanners. More loss of transparency!

Just to make it official. . . RadioReference hasn't dropped or deleted anything. As noted above, sometimes the FCC database links have issues, but that's outside our control as RR pulls the data from the FCC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top