Working Conditions Trouble Dispatchers

Status
Not open for further replies.

benjaminfs733

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
225
Location
Nashville, TN
Target 32: Working Conditions Trouble Dispatchers
TheLouisvilleChannel.com
12:51 p.m. EST March 8, 2007

LOUISVILLE, Ky. - The call-takers and dispatchers at Metrosafe, the 18-month old agency charged with taking the Metro area?s emergency calls, racked up thousands of hours of overtime in the past fiscal year. And some Metrosafe workers claimed the stressful workload is risky given the serious nature of the job. One former call-taker, who wished to remain anonymous, said mandated overtime ? which is agreed to in the workers? contracts, but often not by individual workers ? makes it hard to perform correctly.

I think considering the stress level and the anxiety level, I think it's a very difficult job to perform for eight hours, forget 12 or 16,? he said. The man worked for Metrosafe as an emergency call-taker for five months before resigning. One major issue he had with the job was scheduling. Currently, call-takers and dispatchers work six days with two days off in order to rotate their off-days.

But the former call-taker said during the week there was mandatory overtime and workers wouldn?t know if they had to stay over until the ends of their shifts. He said this led to some dispatchers routinely working 12- and 16-hour shifts.

Your senses could be dulled, you could be overly tired,? the source said. ?Yeah, it?s a potentially bad situation to be in. But Metrosafe director Doug Hamilton rejected claims that the working conditions there are unacceptable. I don?t think it?s unreasonable at all,? Hamilton said.

He said the mandatory overtime is included in the dispatchers and call-takers? Teamsters Union contract and so is the 16-hour maximum workday. It?s a job that?s in the best interest of safety and our staffing is for that reason,? Hamilton said. ?It?s for no other reason. He also pointed out that Metrosafe must be staffed 24 hours per day, seven days per week.

According to Metro Louisville records, Metrosafe had 162 employees on average in 2006, with an average of 11 unfilled job positions at any given time. Those call-takers and dispatchers worked more than 51,000 hours of overtime or an average of seven hours of overtime per week per employee.

But the former call-taker who Newschannel 32 interviewed said overtime isn?t distributed evenly. Junior employees or probationary workers are typically forced to work more overtime and some employees choose to take as much overtime as possible.

According to his records, he worked 189 hours of overtime in 17 weeks, averaging more than 11 hours of overtime per week. When you add up mandatory overtime, you really don?t have access to much of a life at all,? he said. Hamilton said there?s nothing unreasonable to the working conditions although the situation isn?t taken lightly.

It's inconvenient, is what the issue is,? Hamilton said. ?I'm sympathetic when you don't know going in that you're not going to be able to get off, but it's not something that's taken lightly.?

Meanwhile, the number of unfilled positions has grown. The average of 11 open positions last year is currently more than double at 23. Hamilton said a new state law requiring drug, alcohol and lie detector testing for new employees has slowed down the hiring process there, but he said a new class of trainees will begin in Spring.

In 2006, its first full year of operation, Metrosafe took 1,357,000 calls in the course of handling 635,000 separate incidents. According to the city?s mid-fiscal-year budget projections, Metrosafe is expected to come in $1.2 million over-budget in 2007 and $300,000 of the overrun is expected to be for employee overtime.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17519836/
 

n4voxgill

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 15, 2000
Messages
2,588
Location
New Braunfels, TX
those working conditions are not unusual. overtime has always been a problem. the ex-employee that was interviewed is probably much better off going into a different career. I don't think he is a match for a dispatcher's job.
 

ofd8001

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 6, 2004
Messages
8,095
Location
Louisville, KY
I'm a fire chief who is a "customer" of MetroSafe. One of my sons was a dispatcher for the old county police department, long before MetroSafe was even thought of. There were numerous times he had to take mandatory overtime due to other dispatchers calling in sick, etc. So the overtime predicament is nothing new.

Having vacancies is a constant too. (You're always going to have someone leave and having a surplus of employees just to cover when someone leaves ain't gonna happen). Because of the intense training program they have, they must wait until they have enough people to set up a class. Training onesies and twosies won't work.

Dispatching is a tough, stressful and full of mental fatigue. I'd rather be on an all day fire, rather than working as a dispatcher for an hour.

Fortunately we are blessed with a lot of good people at MetroSafe who give their greatest effort. Just like anywhere else, however, you will find a malcontent or two who like to gripe about everything, and that's what sells newspapers so you hear about that kind of stuff a lot more often than the good parts.

My hat goes off to the dedicated folks at the other end of the microphone. They are just as important at a fire as the person holding the fire hose.

I know there are a couple of MetroSafe dispatchers who haunt this forum occasionally and I'm sure they may have an opinion to offer about their conditions. That being probably not the greatest, but they are dedicated and they go there most every day because they know they are needed.

The real problem is this, in my opinion. Those of us in government service know there are not nearly enough people to do the job correctly. We need more firefighters, police officers, medical folks and dispatchers in order to provide the very best service possible. Yeah, we are getting by and doing a decent job, but it could be better. But increasing staffing costs money. The only way to do that is raise taxes. So the elected officials get caught in the middle. On one hand, they want the job done right, but on the other, they want to get re-elected. Raising taxes isn't conducive to that. So until the public realizes that they can be served a lot better than they are and they are willing to give up some green, then there will be understaffing, everywhere.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top