RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners, Receivers and Related Equipment Forums > Radio Shack Scanners


Radio Shack Scanners - A forum for the discussion of all Radio Shack scanning radios and receivers.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2008, 5:46 PM
WayneH's Avatar
Forums Veteran
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sitting in an airport somewhere
Posts: 8,432
Default Programming the PRO-96 and 2096 for rebanded Motorola trunked systems

Everyone, I believe I can successfully say that the digital RadioShack scanners such as the PRO-96 and 2096 (along with most of the GRE's) will support rebanded Motorola trunked systems that utilize a 3600 ("SmartNet") control channel. This is done through the custom table feature that these radio have.

Please note: you will need Starrsoft's WIN96 software to program the custom tables. You can get the software here.

Here is the table to program:

Code:
ChLO ChHI  Step    Offset  Base
440  559  25.000  440     851.025000
000  719  25.000    0     851.012500
720  759  25.000    0     848.000000
815  831  25.000    0     846.625000
958  958  25.000  958     868.975000
961 1022  25.000    0     843.400000
This is meant to support systems whether they are in the process of transitioning from 866MHz freqs or have already switched over and only use 850MHz frequencies. The two systems which have been mentioned in other threads on RadioReference (Alabama and Vacaville, California) have made complete transitions. Vacaville specifically was using 866 and immediately moved off them to the 850MHz freqs.

To simplify programming, if your system has rebanded and does NOT use any frequencies above 862MHz you only need to program the two ranges below.

Code:
ChLO ChHI  Step    Offset  Base
440  559  25.000  440     851.025000
000  719  25.000    0     851.012500
YOU MUST PUT THE 440 ROW FIRST OR IT WILL NOT WORK PROPERLY. A higher row takes priority over a lower row.

This information will only work with specific GRE and RadioShack models. As of now there are no solutions, temporary or permanent, for Uniden scanners. Please be patient as I'm sure Uniden will produce a firmware upgrade eventually.

Also, please do not PM me with questions regarding programming your scanner. If you are unsure about how to do something please ask in the forums as it will benefit others. I WILL NOT ANSWER ANY PM'S ABOUT HOW TO PROGRAM YOUR SCANNER. Thank you.
__________________
If you PM me expect a long delay. Please use direct email for a quicker response.
Got an admin question? -> Forum Rules & Guidelines
Please follow the forum rules and contact a moderator directly, not via a thread.

Last edited by loumaag; 03-20-2008 at 9:44 AM.. Reason: Wrapped the tables in <code> for easier reading
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2008, 9:10 PM
de784's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 673
Default table

Thanks for posting the info I did it for DE can I ask though when done should the results be just the two control channels in the pro 96.
Thanks
__________________
pro 83
(2) Pro 96
pro 97
psr500
pro 2022
pro 164
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-2008, 10:26 PM
WayneH's Avatar
Forums Veteran
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sitting in an airport somewhere
Posts: 8,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by de784
Thanks for posting the info I did it for DE can I ask though when done should the results be just the two control channels in the pro 96.
Thanks
I would guess that the number of control channels shouldn't change. But what they'll be may not be -15MHz like often rumored. They may end up going traditional and use the highest numbered frequencies from the newly licensed rebanded freqs.
__________________
If you PM me expect a long delay. Please use direct email for a quicker response.
Got an admin question? -> Forum Rules & Guidelines
Please follow the forum rules and contact a moderator directly, not via a thread.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 5:01 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,580
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne_h
To simplify programming, if your system has rebanded and does NOT use any frequencies above 862MHz you only need to program the two ranges below.

Code:
ChLO ChHI  Step    Offset  Base
440  559  25.000  440     851.025000
000  719  25.000    0     851.012500
YOU MUST PUT THE 440 ROW FIRST OR IT WILL NOT WORK PROPERLY. A higher row takes priority over a lower row.
In the second table row it seems that ChHI numbers above 439 would be 862 MHz or higher and are not valid for rebanded systems. Changing ChHI to 439 instead of 719 in the second row should still work and the table rows can then be in any order. At least it looks that way to me - did I miss something?
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2008, 5:39 PM
WayneH's Avatar
Forums Veteran
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sitting in an airport somewhere
Posts: 8,432
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pro92b
In the second table row it seems that ChHI numbers above 439 would be 862 MHz or higher and are not valid for rebanded systems. Changing ChHI to 439 instead of 719 in the second row should still work and the table rows can then be in any order. At least it looks that way to me - did I miss something?
Yeah, you did. If you broke up the second range you would exceed the number of ranges for the table. You're basically working off the premise that the scanner will use the first line as priority over the second and when a frequency over 854 is found it jumps to the second range and calculates with the old values.

With the GRE's it's less of an issue since they have more than six ranges.
__________________
If you PM me expect a long delay. Please use direct email for a quicker response.
Got an admin question? -> Forum Rules & Guidelines
Please follow the forum rules and contact a moderator directly, not via a thread.
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 1:26 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6
Smile Working...

Thanks, These are working on the Albertville System on my Pro-96 and Pro-2096. Now just waiting on something for my BCD996T. I just hope Uniden doesn't drag there feet on this one.


Code:
ChLO ChHI  Step    Offset  Base
440  559  25.000  440     851.025000
000  719  25.000    0     851.012500
YOU MUST PUT THE 440 ROW FIRST OR IT WILL NOT WORK PROPERLY. A higher row takes
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 1:31 PM
gg750's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne_h
Everyone, I believe I can successfully say that the digital RadioShack scanners such as the PRO-96 and 2096 (along with most of the GRE's) will support rebanded Motorola trunked systems that utilize a 3600 ("SmartNet") control channel. This is done through the custom table feature that these radio have.
What about systems that use a 9600 control channel? Will this work for those systems as well?

G
__________________
Pro-96
Pro-2096
BC785D
BCT15
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 1:35 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Franktown, CO
Posts: 4,104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gg750
What about systems that use a 9600 control channel? Will this work for those systems as well?
Not with the same values (the values above are specifically for 800 MHz 3600bps CC systems).

"Post-rebanding", you should be able to use a program like PRO96COM to get the "table information" for a 9600CC system.
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 3:52 PM
mikey60's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oakland County Michigan
Posts: 3,415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gg750
What about systems that use a 9600 control channel? Will this work for those systems as well?

G
In most cases, the tables for 800mhz for 9600bps control channels should not change at all. All you should need to do for those systems is to reprogram the control channels.

Mike
__________________
http://www.psredit.com
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 3:55 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Franktown, CO
Posts: 4,104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey60
In most cases, the tables for 800mhz for 9600bps control channels should not change at all. All you should need to do for those systems is to reprogram the control channels.
Where, of course, "most cases" means "scanners that determine voice channel frequencies based solely upon data in the CC", a set of scanners that does not include the PRO-96/2096.

EDIT: If a system's "rebanding" merely involves excluding the "no-longer-valid" channels, then the control channel reprogramming mentioned by Mike will work. If, however, whoever is responsible for the system decides to keep the same channel numbers but move them down by several MHz, then additional work will be required of the scanner user.

Last edited by DonS; 03-22-2008 at 4:04 PM..
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 4:18 PM
mikey60's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oakland County Michigan
Posts: 3,415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonS
Where, of course, "most cases" means "scanners that determine voice channel frequencies based solely upon data in the CC", a set of scanners that does not include the PRO-96/2096.

EDIT: If a system's "rebanding" merely involves excluding the "no-longer-valid" channels, then the control channel reprogramming mentioned by Mike will work. If, however, whoever is responsible for the system decides to keep the same channel numbers but move them down by several MHz, then additional work will be required of the scanner user.
Actually "Most Cases" means that the tables used for 800 mhz on 9600 bps control channels don't have to change to continue to work correctly. Since the default tables start at 851.00625 and go in 6.25Khz steps.

The only major rebanding that has occured on 9600bps systems that I'm aware of at this point is Colorado DTRS. In that case, they did not change the tables at all, only the channel numbers used for the frequencies. I think most if not all rebanding systems will probably follow the same method.

Mike
__________________
http://www.psredit.com
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 4:22 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Franktown, CO
Posts: 4,104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey60
Actually "Most Cases" means that the tables used for 800 mhz on 9600 bps control channels don't have to change to continue to work correctly. Since the default tables start at 851.00625 and go in 6.25Khz steps.

The only major rebanding that has occured on 9600bps systems that I'm aware of at this point is Colorado DTRS. In that case, they did not change the tables at all, only the channel numbers used for the frequencies. I think most if not all rebanding systems will probably follow the same method.
But, I'm sure you'll agree that someone responsible for the channel <-> frequency relationship for a system could leave the channel numbers alone, instead opting to change the "base frequency" for one or more of the system's "Identifiers" (which would likely require an update of all the radios on the system). In such a case, a PRO-96/2096 would have to be tweaked by the user, since the channel <-> frequency relationship no longer matches the "default" values used by the scanner.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 6:54 PM
mikey60's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Oakland County Michigan
Posts: 3,415
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonS
But, I'm sure you'll agree that someone responsible for the channel <-> frequency relationship for a system could leave the channel numbers alone, instead opting to change the "base frequency" for one or more of the system's "Identifiers" (which would likely require an update of all the radios on the system). In such a case, a PRO-96/2096 would have to be tweaked by the user, since the channel <-> frequency relationship no longer matches the "default" values used by the scanner.
Of course that's always a possibility. I think this will likely be the exception, and not the norm. There's only one 800Mhz system that I know of at the moment that doesn't use the "standard" 800 Mhz tables (Parma OH).

Mike
__________________
http://www.psredit.com
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008, 8:40 PM
K4OC's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clayton, NC
Posts: 128
Smile viewing the table all ready installed

Thank you for posting what you did. I have a friend who loaded his database onto my scanner so I did not have to manually enter anything via WIN96. I have the programming cable, WIN96 and the latest firmware along with a current frequency configuration entered into my scanner.
I was fidling around in WIN96 looking at my downloaded file from my PRO-96 and I see where you are talking about creating a custom table. This made me think that I first need to see what table is currently being used to figure if I need to update this or if my friend all ready updated this setting table you are talking about. That is when I could not figure out how to check the currently used table. I see some numbers that are greyed out there and it is only when I choose "custom" for MOT 3600 CC that I am able to see and / or address any numbers there.

So if you would can you please shed some more light on this subject.

Sam Cederas
K4OC
Raleigh, N.C.


Quote:
Originally Posted by wayne_h
Everyone, I believe I can successfully say that the digital RadioShack scanners such as the PRO-96 and 2096 (along with most of the GRE's) will support rebanded Motorola trunked systems that utilize a 3600 ("SmartNet") control channel. This is done through the custom table feature that these radio have.

Here is the table to program:

Code:
ChLO ChHI  Step    Offset  Base
440  559  25.000  440     851.025000
000  719  25.000    0     851.012500
720  759  25.000    0     848.000000
815  831  25.000    0     846.625000
958  958  25.000  958     868.975000
961 1022  25.000    0     843.400000
This is meant to support systems whether they are in the process of transitioning from 866MHz freqs or have already switched over and only use 850MHz frequencies. The two systems which have been mentioned in other threads on RadioReference (Alabama and Vacaville, California) have made complete transitions. Vacaville specifically was using 866 and immediately moved off them to the 850MHz freqs.

To simplify programming, if your system has rebanded and does NOT use any frequencies above 862MHz you only need to program the two ranges below.

Code:
ChLO ChHI  Step    Offset  Base
440  559  25.000  440     851.025000
000  719  25.000    0     851.012500
YOU MUST PUT THE 440 ROW FIRST OR IT WILL NOT WORK PROPERLY. A higher row takes priority over a lower row.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-26-2008, 10:28 PM
loumaag's Avatar
Silent Key - Aug 2014
   
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 13,132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by K4OC
So if you would can you please shed some more light on this subject.
Sam,

Open up a new template in Win96 and then click on the "Channels" tab. Go to the box that says "MOT 3600 CC" and click on the "Multi table" radio button. Once you do that, you can click the "Extended Tables" button. That will open up a pop-up window that allows you to customize the table. Normally it show the current (old?) 800 band plan by default, but you can click any of the radio buttons and it will change to the standard (or default) plan for what ever you clicked on. (Be careful, remember to do this on a blank bank or else you might screw up what you have properly programmed.)

Hope that helps.
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 6:36 AM
K4OC's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clayton, NC
Posts: 128
Default

Oh yes this does help and I really appreciate the feedback.
One more question....when I am looking at my current database that is loaded in my scanner via WIN96....I click on the "Channels" tab and see over in the upper right hand corner a greyed out area "MOT Custom Trunking Table"...and in there I can make out the entries for "Base Frequency" (406.000000), "Offset" (380), "Step Size Khz"(25.00)..... is this the current table that is loaded?? That is what I can not figure out how to view.
I understand how to create a new custom table...it is just that I do not understand how to view what is currently being used. It caught me off guard to see a base frequency listed as 406.00000 since I am listening to RPD, etc.
Thanks so much.

Sam Cederas
K4OC
Raleigh, N.C.

Quote:
Originally Posted by loumaag
Sam,

Open up a new template in Win96 and then click on the "Channels" tab. Go to the box that says "MOT 3600 CC" and click on the "Multi table" radio button. Once you do that, you can click the "Extended Tables" button. That will open up a pop-up window that allows you to customize the table. Normally it show the current (old?) 800 band plan by default, but you can click any of the radio buttons and it will change to the standard (or default) plan for what ever you clicked on. (Be careful, remember to do this on a blank bank or else you might screw up what you have properly programmed.)

Hope that helps.
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 8:02 AM
loumaag's Avatar
Silent Key - Aug 2014
   
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 13,132
Default

The Pro-96/2096 has the capability to use the preloaded (you don't see them) standard band plan for the 800 or 900 MHz bands or a splinter band plan for 800 MHz (used near the borders.) It also has the ability to use a custom band plan (that is the one in the upper right hand side of the software window), this is used for either VHF or UHF and can be set via the keyboard on the radio or in the software. The default numbers you see in that (either in the radio or in the Win96 software) are the UHF defaults because most non-800/900 MHz TRS are UHF with those defaults. They can be changed, more on that in a moment. The radio is also capable of using a multi-table band plan; however, that multi-table can only be accessed via software. You cannot set it on the radio directly. In the Win96 software, the instructions I gave you earlier will give the ability to see any of the plans (including the standard or splinter plans) by viewing them in the multi-table. In the software (Win96) the custom table is accessed the same way you access the multi-table, just click on the "Custom table" radio button.
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2008, 8:11 AM
K4OC's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clayton, NC
Posts: 128
Default

Thank you Lou Maag !!

I appreciate your help. Now on with the tinkering !!!


Sam Cederas
K4OC
Raleigh, N.C.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-28-2008, 2:35 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ILL
Posts: 2,573
Default

Thanks Lou for your info on the "Extended Tables", i was wondering where one would put that Hi-Lo freqy stuf until i followed your directions on my Win96...So far here in ILL our Moto Type11 trunking has not reached that far but at least guys on here are thinking about what has to happen in the future....Looks like there is hope for my PRO96/2096, not sure about Uniden yet....
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2008, 5:47 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5
Question question

does any one know if u can directly down load frequiecies off this site to the pro96
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions