Info on the delays/issues with the Metrocrest Quad Cities Public Safety Radio System

Status
Not open for further replies.

n5ims

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
3,993
The Unity radios were issued to PD and FD to allow them to directly communicate with nearby agencies that they work with regularly on many fronts. UHF for Dallas (for various incidents), and VHF for Texas Highway Patrol (generally for incidents on or near the various toll roads that intersect the 4 cities). This communication isn't just during major incidents (where only supervisors could handle the interop traffic), but during even small incidents like car wrecks and small fires or EMS calls where the various cities are dispatched routinely to assist or even handle the incident for those sister agencies.
 

mostinterestingman

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 7, 2010
Messages
111
Are there ANY Harris TDMA simulcast out there that have been a success? Seems like they all are full of fail. Every system has its growing pains and hiccups, but it seems like one after another Harris systems wind up in the courts.
 

JFDoering

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2003
Messages
49
Location
Dunlap, IL
Harris P25 TDMA and Open Sky

Two Chicago suburbs are successfully using Harris OpenSky, which is is basically four-slot TDMA. There are areas where OpenSky two-slot TDMA (a cousin to P25 Phase II) provides better in-building coverage. The more significant difference between that system and this Texas system is simulcast. Digital simulcast systems are far more difficult to debug. They are also a bane of scanner users, since most scanners cannot handle the reception of simulcast signals even slightly different in time of arrival.

Peoria County, Illinois put in a Harris P25 simulcast system with eleven sites. It works great for the users. Scanner reception varies from phenomenal to unmonitorable, depending on your location relative to the sites.

Patches, or interoperability links, coming from analog systems into digital systems tend to be terrible. Digital to analog works great. Digital to another digital system usually works well also.
 

TexScan780D

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 20, 2003
Messages
1,162
Are there ANY Harris TDMA simulcast out there that have been a success? Seems like they all are full of fail. Every system has its growing pains and hiccups, but it seems like one after another Harris systems wind up in the courts.


Yes. P25 Phase II Simulcast. Radio problems, having to ship them back. Majority of the time can not make sense what is being said on the radio.
 

Motoballa

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
403
My thoughts..

I think better research could have gone into this project. My city tested out our new radio system before we spent millions on it. We did the research, asked other cities and departments what they think about theirs. I wouldn't blame Harris(completely), it all goes into the research, I saw a News 8 report where they said it went down for about 30 minutes and Officers were left without communication. They should always have a backup plan. We currently use a Motorola System and have good structured failsoft systems in place so if the system does fail our emergency services can still communicate safely. I can't really blame Harris completely. :)
 

n5ims

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
3,993
I think better research could have gone into this project. My city tested out our new radio system before we spent millions on it. We did the research, asked other cities and departments what they think about theirs. I wouldn't blame Harris(completely), it all goes into the research, I saw a News 8 report where they said it went down for about 30 minutes and Officers were left without communication. They should always have a backup plan. We currently use a Motorola System and have good structured failsoft systems in place so if the system does fail our emergency services can still communicate safely. I can't really blame Harris completely. :)

Well, they weren't TOTALLY out of communications. Their MDTs still worked as well as their cell phones. They were also able to revert to their fallback and interop channels once the outage was confirmed and they were requested to move to those channels. Most dispatching was done using MDTs and this worked pretty well (a bit slower but worked as designed). The most serious issue was that once an officer was out of their car, their communication options were very limited. Had someone needed help quickly, it would take several minutes for them to notify dispatch and even longer for that help to arrive. It would also severely hamper officer-to-officer communication on what the issue was, suspect description, etc.

While I agree that additional research should've been done, there's more to the decision to go with Harris than that. For one thing, Harris opened an office in Carrollton not too long ago. Perhaps an agreement to purchase the replacement system from them was a factor in them opening this office in the city.
 
Last edited:

motorola_otaku

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
690
Are there ANY Harris TDMA simulcast out there that have been a success? Seems like they all are full of fail. Every system has its growing pains and hiccups, but it seems like one after another Harris systems wind up in the courts.
To their credit the Montgomery County system has worked as designed from go-live, from what I've heard from system users.
 

n5ims

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2004
Messages
3,993
The database is showing it's Phase 1

Where is that? On the listing I see (Metrocrest Quad Cities Public Safety Radio System Trunking System, Carrollton, Texas - Scanner Frequencies) it clearly shows a System Type: of "Project 25 Phase II".

I also see that their license doesn't accurately reflect their current operation either. The emission codes do not appear to be correct for the P-25 Harris system. Also, although they're clearly still using the frequency of 860.26250, it was deleted from their license back on 11/03/2015 from modification # 0007011615.

ULS Application - PubSafty/SpecEmer/PubSaftyNtlPlan,806-817/851-862MHz,Trunked - 0007011615 - CITY OF CARROLLTON, TEXAS - Administration
11/03/2015 Location 1, Antenna 1, Frequency 00860.26250:Assigned or lower frequency deleted 860.26250000
11/03/2015 Location 1, Antenna 1, Frequency 00860.26250, EMISSION 17:Emission Designator deleted 16K0F3E
11/03/2015 Location 1, Antenna 1, Frequency 00860.26250, EMISSION 18:Emission Designator deleted 16K0F9W
11/03/2015 Location 1, Antenna 1, Frequency 00860.76250:Assigned or lower frequency deleted 860.76250000
11/03/2015 Location 1, Antenna 1, Frequency 00860.76250, EMISSION 19:Emission Designator deleted 20K0F1D
11/03/2015 Location 2, Antenna 1, Frequency 00815.26250:Assigned or lower frequency deleted 815.26250000
11/03/2015 Location 2, Antenna 1, Frequency 00815.26250, EMISSION 55:Emission Designator deleted 16K0F3E
11/03/2015 Location 2, Antenna 1, Frequency 00815.26250, EMISSION 56:Emission Designator deleted 16K0F9W
11/03/2015 Location 3, Antenna 1, Frequency 00815.26250:Assigned or lower frequency deleted 815.26250000

Delete 000860.26250000 1 1 9 FB2 1 75.000 200.000
Delete 000860.76250000 1 1 10 FB 1 100.000 200.000
Delete 000815.26250000 3 1 9 MO 1050 15.000 8.000
Delete 000815.76250000 3 1 10 MO 1050 15.000 8.000

Their current license --> ULS License - PubSafty/SpecEmer/PubSaftyNtlPlan,806-817/851-862MHz,Trunked License - KNJU868 - CITY OF CARROLLTON, TEXAS

I suspect that the licensing issue is that Xerox (the Motorola contractor) controls the license while Harris is doing the work on the new system. Hopefully these licensing issues won't be another costly issue for the cities.
 

otter9309

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
154
Location
On the move
Correct, I was asking about Montgomery County so we could compare apples to apples.

Correct, the discussion was asking if there is a successful type 2 from Harris, and it was mentioned that Montgomery county was working well, but it is not TDMA, it is operating in FDMA.
 

KevinC

Other
Super Moderator
Joined
Jan 7, 2001
Messages
11,535
Location
Home
Correct, the discussion was asking if there is a successful type 2 from Harris, and it was mentioned that Montgomery county was working well, but it is not TDMA, it is operating in FDMA.

Thanks.
 

mostinterestingman

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 7, 2010
Messages
111
is it harris corporate or the local dealer having all the issues

Well when you consider NY State, Vegas, Oakland, Metro Crest, and others i'm sure this just comes down to the product & parent company itself (Harris, Tyco, Macom, CommNet, Ericsson, GE) . How many Motorola systems are being bought back (honest question)? The Houston issues were mostly the fault of the city system administrators that restricted talkgroups geographically, using mismatched encryption keys, and providing no training to end users that have never operated on a trunked system before.

Honestly I do not think Harris realized what a turd the product line was when they bought it, because the green radio company makes a pretty damn good product.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top