mmckenna
I ♥ Ø
Had my spectrum analyzer with tracking generator home from work to check the antenna on my wife's truck.
Decided to shoot a Larsen NMOQ and a Larsen NMOWBQ for comparison.
The Larsen NMOQC is a 'field tunable' NMO mount quarter wave antenna. It's an NMO base with a thin whip. https://www.theantennafarm.com/cata...roduct_info&cPath=191_192_206&products_id=767
The Larsen NMOWBQC is an NMO mount wide band quarter wave antenna. It has a thicker whip, compared to the NMOQ, and has a spring at the whip base. Whip diameter and the diameter of the spring helps give it the 'wide band' nature. https://www.theantennafarm.com/cata...nfo&cPath=191_192_195_457_212&products_id=724
They are not tuned to exactly the same spot on the spectrum, so the valley of low SWR is going to fall at a different point. This not anything to do with the antenna design, but reflects on the whip length, where it was cut, and what section of the VHF band it was intended to be used on. Since I use commercial radios in my personal vehicles for both amateur and commercial stuff, I stick with Part 90 radios and usually tune the antennas somewhere in the middle between the 2 meter band and the section of the VHF LMR band I'm using at work.
Like my other posts on quarter wave antennas and discones, this isn't intended to sell you anything or reflect anything to do with radiation angles. I'm just sharing the screen shots to show the differences between the two antenna models.
Larsen NMOQC. Note, the #3 marker is off, so don't go by the SWR reading, but compare the trace to the wide band antenna below:
Larsen NMOWBQC:
Decided to shoot a Larsen NMOQ and a Larsen NMOWBQ for comparison.
The Larsen NMOQC is a 'field tunable' NMO mount quarter wave antenna. It's an NMO base with a thin whip. https://www.theantennafarm.com/cata...roduct_info&cPath=191_192_206&products_id=767
The Larsen NMOWBQC is an NMO mount wide band quarter wave antenna. It has a thicker whip, compared to the NMOQ, and has a spring at the whip base. Whip diameter and the diameter of the spring helps give it the 'wide band' nature. https://www.theantennafarm.com/cata...nfo&cPath=191_192_195_457_212&products_id=724
They are not tuned to exactly the same spot on the spectrum, so the valley of low SWR is going to fall at a different point. This not anything to do with the antenna design, but reflects on the whip length, where it was cut, and what section of the VHF band it was intended to be used on. Since I use commercial radios in my personal vehicles for both amateur and commercial stuff, I stick with Part 90 radios and usually tune the antennas somewhere in the middle between the 2 meter band and the section of the VHF LMR band I'm using at work.
Like my other posts on quarter wave antennas and discones, this isn't intended to sell you anything or reflect anything to do with radiation angles. I'm just sharing the screen shots to show the differences between the two antenna models.
Larsen NMOQC. Note, the #3 marker is off, so don't go by the SWR reading, but compare the trace to the wide band antenna below:
Larsen NMOWBQC: