New ERS Tier 3 system

[west-pac]

Connersville (Site L10-29); a couple of days ago, was showing NO neighbors with DSD+ (about a mile down the road from the tower site)...

Richmond (Site L10-13 (assumed)) was still showing as a CON+ site (I ran all the freqs under that license (s) while I was in Richmond)...

Dave T.

So L10-13 is no longer indicated as a Neighbor of L10-29?

 

[mtindor]

So L10-13 is no longer indicated as a Neighbor of L10-29?

I'm sure that's not the case. I think he just omitted the neighbor because it was CC=1 and likely not online (especially when he couldn't pick it up when testing freqs).

 

[n8yid]

So L10-13 is no longer indicated as a Neighbor of L10-29?

When I checked this site; via DSD+, it was showing L10-13 as a neighbor... I really fat fingered that early on...
Yes, L10-13 (Richmond) is a neighbor to L10-29 (Connersville)... and it was a CC=1

 

[west-pac]

When I checked this site; via DSD+, it was showing L10-13 as a neighbor... I really fat fingered that early on...
Yes, L10-13 (Richmond) is a neighbor to L10-29 (Connersville)...

Thank you.

 

[venom6733]

@venom6733 Are you able to monitor L10-29 on 451.9625?

@INDaviation Are you able to monitor 451.009375 again, and see if those neighbors are still using CC 1?

I can barely get a signal here and its not enough for DSD to see it

 

[INDaviation]

@venom6733 Are you able to monitor L10-29 on 451.9625?

@INDaviation Are you able to monitor 451.009375 again, and see if those neighbors are still using CC 1?

I can confirm those sites are still CC 1.

Sorry for such a late reply. Today was the first I've been able to sit down and run DSD for a while uninterrupted.

 

[west-pac]

New site freqs to look for in Shelby Co.

ULS Application - Industrial/Business Pool, Trunked - 0010901969 - EMERGENCY RADIO SERVICE, LLC DBA ERS WIRELESS