Scanner recommendations

Status
Not open for further replies.

jvradenburg

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
36
Location
Somewhere, USA
After seeing some threads talking about doing your homework before buying a scanner I would like to know people's opinion on what would be a good scanner that picks up your digital frequencies with close call function that also does trunking, our local area has apparently switched to what I'm thinking is 700 or 800 MHz and is digital I believe possibly p25 phase 2. I noticed they updated part of our state interoped frequencies so I'm thinking they moved there.
 

Enjoi19

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 17, 2020
Messages
986
Let us know your region so people will be able to make proper recommendations. Without that, you will end up getting recommended many things that may or may not work well for you.
 

hiegtx

Mentor
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
11,431
Location
Dallas, TX
After seeing some threads talking about doing your homework before buying a scanner I would like to know people's opinion on what would be a good scanner that picks up your digital frequencies with close call function that also does trunking, our local area has apparently switched to what I'm thinking is 700 or 800 MHz and is digital I believe possibly p25 phase 2. I noticed they updated part of our state interoped frequencies so I'm thinking they moved there.
The key to an accurate recommendation would be your location What is your city (or county) & state?

For your area, it will depend on whether or not Simulcast is being used on any of the systems you wish to monitor.. If so, then Uniden's SDS series scanners are best for dealing with simulcast. If no simulcast on any of the systems that interest you, then you have more options. The 436HP & 536HP are not good for Simulcast, but correctly programmed, they do well on most other systems. If you plan, at some future date, to travel & take your scanner with you, the Uniden x36HP & SDS series scanners have the database in them, so you can use a GPS and let the scanner enable those systems in range, dropping them out of the scan sequence once they pass out of range.

The Uniden P2 series scanners (325P2 handheld & 996P2 base/mobile are also good choices (again, though, only if simulcast is not in use). These do not have the database, so they would require more programming if used on a trip.

All of these Uniden scanners can get the paid upgrades if DMR or NXDN capability is desired, All are capable of handling Phase II systems.

In the Whistler lineup, your two major candidates are the TRX-1 (handheld) or TRX-2 (base/mobile). These scanners do not do well with simulast, and sometimes overload if there are too many strong transmitters near them. While they do have the database on their memory card, you cannot use them with a GPS. These two can receive DMR & NXDN, but they do not trunk-track those system types. Instead, they check the programmed frequencies to see if any of the programmed talkgroups are active, and if so, they can receive them. Since they do not actually track DMR & NXDN systems, you can't easily follow a specific talkgroup on a system.

Looking at your past postings, I see several concerning Hancock County, IL. If that is the correct location of interest, that county is near the state line. Are there systems 'across the line" that also interest you?
 

K4EET

Chaplain
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 18, 2015
Messages
2,414
Location
Severn, Maryland, USA
Hi @jvradenburg. As the others have said, we need to know where you are in Somewhere, USA. Also to be considered, is whether or not your agencies are using encryption which no scanner can decode. Some systems may be DMR or other type that would possibly require adding one or more options to a Uniden scanner. Be sure to let us know specifically who you want to hear for that reason. Cheers! Dave
 

Ensnared

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 24, 2004
Messages
4,513
Location
Waco, Texas
If you are near Sioux City, Woodbury County, you can forget listening to most LE. However, if you are elsewhere, I would recommend the SDS 100 if you are going to monitor ISICS. You can set the SDS 100 to "Use Site NAC." This helps matters. You can upgrade the SDS 100 to DMR, NXDN, and PV. The Uniden 436/536HP and SDS 100/200 are superior when compared to Whistler. Whistler does not follow trunked conversations on DMR or NXDN.

I checked all of the listed trunked systems in Iowa and did not see any EDACS PV.
 
Last edited:

mws72

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 30, 2002
Messages
846
Location
Quad-Cities (IA-IL) USA
Seeing Lee County has just joined ISICSI I believe this what you want to monitor since a earlier mention the Hancock Co area.
The 536HP can be used, I use one on ISICS here in Davenport. I do have a friend with SDS-200 that would be very good except for a Unication Pager.
 

jvradenburg

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
36
Location
Somewhere, USA
The key to an accurate recommendation would be your location What is your city (or county) & state?

For your area, it will depend on whether or not Simulcast is being used on any of the systems you wish to monitor.. If so, then Uniden's SDS series scanners are best for dealing with simulcast. If no simulcast on any of the systems that interest you, then you have more options. The 436HP & 536HP are not good for Simulcast, but correctly programmed, they do well on most other systems. If you plan, at some future date, to travel & take your scanner with you, the Uniden x36HP & SDS series scanners have the database in them, so you can use a GPS and let the scanner enable those systems in range, dropping them out of the scan sequence once they pass out of range.

The Uniden P2 series scanners (325P2 handheld & 996P2 base/mobile are also good choices (again, though, only if simulcast is not in use). These do not have the database, so they would require more programming if used on a trip.

All of these Uniden scanners can get the paid upgrades if DMR or NXDN capability is desired, All are capable of handling Phase II systems.

In the Whistler lineup, your two major candidates are the TRX-1 (handheld) or TRX-2 (base/mobile). These scanners do not do well with simulast, and sometimes overload if there are too many strong transmitters near them. While they do have the database on their memory card, you cannot use them with a GPS. These two can receive DMR & NXDN, but they do not trunk-track those system types. Instead, they check the programmed frequencies to see if any of the programmed talkgroups are active, and if so, they can receive them. Since they do not actually track DMR & NXDN systems, you can't easily follow a specific talkgroup on a system.

Looking at your past postings, I see several concerning Hancock County, IL. If that is the correct location of interest, that county is near the state line. Are there systems 'across the line" that also interest you?
Hancock county Illinois would be one I'm interested in I live right across the river in Lee county Iowa and the little town of Keokuk which would be my primary listening
 

jvradenburg

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
36
Location
Somewhere, USA
Seeing Lee County has just joined ISICSI I believe this what you want to monitor since a earlier mention the Hancock Co area.
The 536HP can be used, I use one on ISICS here in Davenport. I do have a friend with SDS-200 that would be very good except for a Unication Pager.
I have a friend who has a 536 and he is unable to get anything in the ISICS even with the close call function on and updating it we found a list of frequencies and they appear to be the upper 800 MHz above 850
 

Whiskey3JMC

Just another lowly hobbyist
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
7,834
Location
Philly burbs 🇺🇸
I have a friend who has a 536 and he is unable to get anything in the ISICS
What site is you friend listening to? Unless they're listening to a site containing simulcast cells, I wouldn't anticipate an issue monitoring using a 536HP if within listening range. One thing I would have your friend check would be to make sure all applicable service types are turned on (reference "Tag" column in the database tables to see what service types pertain to what talkgroups)
 

jvradenburg

Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Messages
36
Location
Somewhere, USA
What site is you friend listening to? Unless they're listening to a site containing simulcast cells, I wouldn't anticipate an issue monitoring using a 536HP if within listening range. One thing I would have your friend check would be to make sure all applicable service types are turned on (reference "Tag" column in the database tables to see what service types pertain to what talkgroups)
I don't know which site he would be listening to he lives only a mile or so from the sheriff's office so he would definitely be within listening range I know he had his 536 and discovery mode and was picking something up but it wasn't playing it all the way like maybe it was interference
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top