Okay, does that mean it's constantly recording and simply "marks" a portion when you hit the "Record" button?Unless you disable replay - it will be constantly writing.
That is how I understand it .Okay, does that mean it's constantly recording and simply "marks" a portion when you hit the "Record" button?
No, it creates a separate audio file for any recordings. The files saved for the Replay feature are saved in a folder labeled as 'inner_rec' under the audio folder. Recordings made if you set the scanner to record everything are in a folder marked as 'user_rec, also under the 'audio' folder.Okay, does that mean it's constantly recording and simply "marks" a portion when you hit the "Record" button?
You might want to check into that Phask....I found out it isn't just for recording, so you might need to ask someone that has a SDS100/200 and get the right answers. These new machines are a different beast from what I was told. And for having a high speed sd card, from what UPMan once said it is advisable, more than reading and writing. It is more a "a few millaseconds" as someone mentioned. But then again YMMV
Not even minimal, there's no chance of corruption when you haven't any audio recordings enabled and if you just move the scanner and the power cable detach and without you accidently touching any buttons in the process. The SDS scanner works exactly as the older 436/536 and only difference are the receiver technology, and the firmware for all other functions are identical between 436/536 and SDS100/200. So no different beast compared to older scanners when it comes to scanning functions or read/write to SD card, management of RAM memory and so on.I said all that to say this, there was never any problem with the SD card because I was able to turn the radio back on each time. It continues to work just fine. If it was only reading the card, the chances of corrupting that card would be minimal. Am I correct?
Thanx, Ubbe,Not even minimal, there's no chance of corruption when you haven't any audio recordings enabled and if you just move the scanner and the power cable detach and without you accidently touching any buttons in the process. The SDS scanner works exactly as the older 436/536 and only difference are the receiver technology, and the firmware for all other functions are identical between 436/536 and SDS100/200. So no different beast compared to older scanners when it comes to scanning functions or read/write to SD card, management of RAM memory and so on.
If you have done any changes like lockouts or other settings, then you probably loose those settings at a sudden power loss and have to enter them again as they are saved when you power off the scanner or change favorite lists.
/Ubbe
MisterLongwire, I believe you miss quoted UPMans post.You might want to check into that Phask....I found out it isn't just for recording, so you might need to ask someone that has a SDS100/200 and get the right answers. These new machines are a different beast from what I was told. And for having a high speed sd card, from what UPMan once said it is advisable, more than reading and writing. It is more a "a few millaseconds" as someone mentioned. But then again YMMV
And as for cards, UpMan only mentioned that they were going from a 8 to a 4 gB card, and as for higher cap cards would only slow you down in startup, not even scanning. Makes sense.... but to you "knowledgeable" ones....LOL Whatever floats your boats ladies
For your next spare card, I highly recommend you switch to a High Endurance type.
So, when you go to replace your card, we are now highly recommending you get an MLC type card. They are typically advertised as "industrial" or "high endurance.".