RadioReference on Facebook   RadioReference on Twitter   RadioReference Blog
 

Go Back   The RadioReference.com Forums > Scanners, Receivers and Related Equipment Forums > Radio Shack Scanners


Radio Shack Scanners - A forum for the discussion of all Radio Shack scanning radios and receivers.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 2:20 PM
WhistlerWendy's Avatar
Whistler Representative
   
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Northwest Arkansas
Posts: 295
Default If you are sending in your unit for the Legacy Upgrade - PLEASE READ

Hi all -
If you are sending in your unit for the Legacy Upgrade, PLEASE do not send your unit in if it is in a locked state as we are unable to unlock it.

If you have an "unauthorized" version of the firmware running on your unit, I suggest you revert it back to the original firmware now, especially before sending it to us.

Thank you,
WW
Sponsored links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 2:26 PM
JustLou's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 488
Default

Whistler has made it impossible for most people that installed the unauthorized firmware to revert it back to the original firmware when it implemented the July 1st time bomb hidden in the 4.6 CPU and 3.1 DSP updates.

Last edited by JustLou; 07-21-2017 at 2:30 PM..
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 2:47 PM
muskrat39's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: north central Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustLou View Post
Whistler has made it impossible for most people that installed the unauthorized firmware to revert it back to the original firmware when it implemented the July 1st time bomb hidden in the 4.6 CPU and 3.1 DSP updates.
which has precedent and has been judged illegal. I see lawsuits coming. It was ruled that though a company owns firmware and software, they do not own hardware. Jail breaking has been ruled also to be legal. I saw this years ago in the FTA community. Eric's tool was just a tool tool allow a legacy scanner to emulate a 1080. This in my opinion is no different than emulating a Windows PC with Mac software or Linux, or emulating a game console on a PC. I see a lot of problems of permanently damaging hardware, that could result in substantial monetary damages, including being forced to repair or replace the locked radios. Also not good for the company's public relations.
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 2:50 PM
Spitfire8520's Avatar
Member
  Audio Feed Provider
Audio Feed Provider
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,690
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhistlerWendy View Post
If you are sending in your unit for the Legacy Upgrade, PLEASE do not send your unit in if it is in a locked state as we are unable to unlock it.
I guess this means that Whistler's attempt to force users off of the "unauthorized" version of firmware to their official paid version has somewhat backfired since they do not have the ability to unlock your scanner once they disable it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JustLou View Post
Whistler has made it impossible for most people that installed the unauthorized firmware to revert it back to the original firmware when it implemented the July 1st time bomb hidden in the 4.6 CPU and 3.1 DSP updates.
This is my impression given the comments floating around. This would mean a good number of users are now SOL both officially and unofficially once the kill switch kicks in.
__________________
Mile-High Spitfire
RadioShack Pro-106 RadioShack Pro-652 RTL-SDR
MNN-250
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 3:06 PM
JustLou's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 488
Default

You can make this stuff up. Whistler purposely and without warning makes it impossible to revert back to the original firmware, and then tells people to revert back to the original firmware. What a fiasco.
Sponsored links
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 3:20 PM
Member
   
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Marcos, Texas
Posts: 9
Default

What would make unauthorized firmware unauthorized?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 3:24 PM
KevinC's Avatar
Moderator
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere other than home :(
Posts: 3,757
Default

Hmmm...

First this...

https://forums.radioreference.com/ra...-movement.html

And now this thread.

Related?
__________________
Someone told me signatures are silly, so I got rid of mine.
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 3:43 PM
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 2,162
Default

Hello,

Renesas provides a firmware flash loader that gets executed if you set a pin (CNVss) high during reset. It uses Serial Port 1.
https://webpages.uncc.edu/~jmconrad/...rogramming.pdf

Since USB is using a PIC18 processor, I figured there was a magic incantation, like connecting a resistor value or voltage level to the ID pin of the USB connector, to make the PIC18 set the M16C into Standard Serial I/O Mode 2 so the USB port can talk to the Renesas Flash Loader.

Maybe this is lost knowledge that only the original GRE embedded software engineers knew. It seems reasonable to design it into the device as a second level of fail-safe. There has to be a method to get the firmware into the chip when the scanner was manufactured.

Wendy should talk to the embedded software engineers for a solution. I can not believe Whistler approved disabling scanners without any way of fixing them. It is just asking for trouble.

73 Eric
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 4:14 PM
cpunut's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricCottrell View Post
Hello,

Renesas provides a firmware flash loader that gets executed if you set a pin (CNVss) high during reset. It uses Serial Port 1.
https://webpages.uncc.edu/~jmconrad/...rogramming.pdf

Since USB is using a PIC18 processor, I figured there was a magic incantation, like connecting a resistor value or voltage level to the ID pin of the USB connector, to make the PIC18 set the M16C into Standard Serial I/O Mode 2 so the USB port can talk to the Renesas Flash Loader.

Maybe this is lost knowledge that only the original GRE embedded software engineers knew. It seems reasonable to design it into the device as a second level of fail-safe. There has to be a method to get the firmware into the chip when the scanner was manufactured.

Wendy should talk to the embedded software engineers for a solution. I can not believe Whistler approved disabling scanners without any way of fixing them. It is just asking for trouble.

73 Eric
My thought on this, if it is true, is that the "disabled" scanners are not disabled at all. Indeed they still have much more capability and bug fixes than the original firmware and accomplish more than originally intended. The hyperbole from this group is amazing!
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 4:25 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 63
Default

Glad I did not send my pro-668 in yet if they can not do anything to fix it what the purpose .The least they could do is let us revert back to original firmware.
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 4:43 PM
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston, Ma
Posts: 2,162
Default

Hello,

So being locked out of the DMR upgrade is not disabling the scanner? This does not make sense from a marketing standpoint as the group locked out of the DMR upgrade are people that expressed an interest in receiving DMR. It appears Whistler is punishing them for ignoring their warnings on the website and daring to use unauthorized software.

73 Eric
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 4:53 PM
Member
   
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 63
Default

I agree why I am I punished for doing something that worked until the last firmware upgrade.That was just sneaky of them on their part.
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 4:56 PM
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Diego County, California
Posts: 2,332
Default

Sounds like lots of people will be flooding back to Uniden side after this 'Trojan code/Malicious code' from Whistler.
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 5:00 PM
Hamradiostuffing's Avatar
Member
   
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnBiker2005 View Post
Sounds like lots of people will be flooding back to Uniden side after this 'Trojan code/Malicious code' from Whistler.
I will if they send mine back broken I will buy a bearcat.
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 5:15 PM
muskrat39's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: north central Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Default

Same here, I was planning to buy a TRX2, but now, I don't think so
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 5:19 PM
tumegpc's Avatar
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 882
Default

Whistler should have just exchanged them out for a true WS1080 and avoided all this mess. I'm not sending in my second 668 anytime soon.
__________________
ICOM IC-R30 - 436HP -TRX-1
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 5:30 PM
NC1 NC1 is offline
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Surry County, North Carolina
Posts: 440
Default

I think the backlash is going to be severe on this one.

Hopefully Uniden can handle all the extra business soon to come their way. Not a single 668 owner is ever going to buy a Whistler product now, and will be sure to influence anyone they know not to buy one either.

Had they supported the 668 owners with the DMR, they could have had a bright future. Funny thing here, they would not write software to upgrade the 668, but they wrote software to disable the unit should it have the ability.
That was just going out of their way to screw people. Hmmmmm, I would not do business at all with a company like that.
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 5:32 PM
muskrat39's Avatar
Member
  Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: north central Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by muskrat39 View Post
Same here, I was planning to buy a TRX2, but now, I don't think so
Just for the record, I don't have a hacked radio, just a genuine 1080. I just am appalled at this, makes me less supporting of the company altogether.
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 5:41 PM
mancow's Avatar
Member
  RadioReference Database Admininstrator
Database Admin
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: N.E. Kansas
Posts: 6,269
Default

Nevermind. I finally found the thread that describes it.

Last edited by mancow; 07-21-2017 at 5:58 PM..
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2017, 5:44 PM
Member
  Premium Subscriber
Premium Subscriber
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,007
Default

There is a "brick" joke in here somewhere...

IF, on the other hand, you just lose the ability to upgrade (or downgrade) and warranty, it's not like you were going to have either in the future anyway.

The most you may lose is the ability for Whistler non-warranty service.
Closed Thread

Tags
trojan malicious code, whistler scanner

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
All information here is Copyright 2012 by RadioReference.com LLC and Lindsay C. Blanton III.Ad Management by RedTyger
Copyright 2015 by RadioReference.com LLC Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions