Also today hearing another new TG, 29102 (291xx Monroe Co, xxx02 Travel)
Heard a man say "Heading back to base, ETA is 1 hour"
Pretty exciting hearing new stuff up here!
I doubt it is the Monroe county site. The closest STARCOM/St. Clair County P25 site to you guys is actually 359A in East Carondelet you also might get decode from 359J in East St. Louis. The St. Clair county simulcast sites are also STARCOM sites. There are no STARCOM only sites online in St. Clair County anymore.
Considering this is a thread for MOSWIN, if you need help or have questions regarding STARCOM PM me.
Pro96Com will retain the functions for each channel the site has been seen using during previous sessions, and retrieve the information in subsequent sessions.N0UDG said:I do not know why certain frequencies are being cross-listed by the “control channel DataStream” on both the Poplar Bluff and Doniphan sites.
It could be. A few NAC's have changed recentlyPoplar Bluff Site NAC is 1C8 – The RR database has 1CB which I think is a typo?
The control channel doesn't advertise any information about a voice channel until it is used.Bloomfield Site (307) – Frequencies:
151.2425c (in Green), 151.340iv, 152.780a, 159.285v, 159.465v
The RR Database has the control & alternate channels switched (152.780c & 151.2425a), has all the other frequencies listed but lists two frequencies (152.525 & 173.775) that are no longer being identified by the control channel as being used.
Talkpair, thank you for the feedback this is why I posted this information. I am new to the use of the Pro96Com Software.
I did initially run with all sites active so they were mixed therefore, I thought what you mentioned may have happen, so I locked only one control channel in at time and reloaded Pro96Com. However, I did not know about tower.txt so I will need to delete this and try again.
The Poplar Bluff NAC also does not follow the format of that the other area sites use, for example Doniphan is 1C6, Bloomfield is 1C7 and my readout from the software and Dongle was 1C8. Therefore, 1CB I thought was a mistake but like you said it could have changed too.
About the frequencies, I think you are thinking of the affiliation log or affiliation list tabs in Pro96Com which do change as more frequencies are used. I should have mentioned what tab I was actually using in Pro96Com to get the frequencies. I was using the tab in Pro96Com labeled "Site Information" and it will always give the exact same frequencies after one second or 1 hour later when accessed. At least it has for me.
Pro96Com “Control Channel” DataStream has generated the following for 2 weeks:
Doniphan Site (317) – Neighboring Sites:
199 – Listed as “Failed, current” (this is the Zone 3 Site on Wheels) – It may have moved out of range.
301, 302, 305, 307, 308, 309, 318 and 328 – These are always listed as “connected, current”.
The present RR Database only lists 318.
Doniphan Site (317) – Frequencies:
161.9375c (in green), 155.610a, 172.4625c (also used by Poplar Bluff site), 155.700i (CWID),
155.445v, 161.850v, 154.980v (also used by Poplar Bluff site)
The present listing on the RR Database has the above frequencies but omits the two Poplar Bluff Frequencies and lists 155.445v which is no longer used according to the data stream from the control channel at the Doniphan Site.
Poplar Bluff Site (308) – Neighboring Sites:
301, 302, 305, 306, 307, 309 and 317, – These are always listed as “connected, current”.
The present RR Database has N/A for Neighboring Sites.
Poplar Bluff Site (308) – Frequencies:
172.4625c (in green), 155.430a, 161.9375c (also used by the Doniphan site), 155.610a (also used by the Doniphan site), 155.325v, 154.980v and 169.8875iv.
The present listing on the RR Database has the above frequencies but omits the two Doniphan Frequencies and lists 155.5475 which is no longer used according to the data stream from the control channel at the Poplar Bluff Site.
I do not know why certain frequencies are being cross-listed by the “control channel DataStream” on both the Poplar Bluff and Doniphan sites.
Poplar Bluff Site NAC is 1C8 – The RR database has 1CB which I think is a typo?
Bloomfield Site (307) – Neighboring Sites:
199 – Listed as “Failed, current” (this is the Zone 3 Site on Wheels) – It may have moved out of range.
301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 308, 309, 317 and 332 – These are always listed as “connected, current”.
The present RR Database lists all the above EXCEPT for 199, 304, 305, 317.
Bloomfield Site (307) – Frequencies:
151.2425c (in Green), 151.340iv, 152.780a, 159.285v, 159.465v
The RR Database has the control & alternate channels switched (152.780c & 151.2425a), has all the other frequencies listed but lists two frequencies (152.525 & 173.775) that are no longer being identified by the control channel as being used.
Van Buren Site (302) – Neighboring Sites:
305, 307, 308, 309, 317, 318, 323 and 325 – These are always listed as “connected, current”.
The present RR Database lists only 308, 317, & 321, 321 is not presently supported by the control channel DataStream.
Van Buren Site (302) – Frequencies:
161.8875c, 155.640a, 155.130v, 161.800v
The present RR Database lists the above frequencies but has two additional frequencies, 155.070 & 155.295a. The present “control channel DataStream” does not support these two frequencies.
The Van Buren NAC is still being determined but I think it is either 1C2 or 1C3. When I am for sure I will report what I have found.
Although my results have been consistent over the last couple weeks or so (except for Van Buren Site’s NAC) I would suggest a second conformation from someone else (if not already SOP) of this data before entertaining any changes to the RR database.
Most of this looks correct. The Doniphan affliate of 328 should be 325 instead. It is correct that the database control and alt control channels for Bloomfield has switched.
I agree it should be 325, this was a typo on my part. 328 is in Lebanon between Rolla and Springfield and a bit out of Doniphan's territory.
For Doniphan I get:
155.70000vi
161.85000v
161.93750c
155.44500v
155.61000a
I agree and this is what I get now. TalkPair was correct, I needed to manually delete the history in Pro96Com and this stopped the Poplar Bluff and Doniphan frequencies "cross posting".
This holds true that most sites use five frequencies, the Sikeston site is the exception in Southeast Missouri as it has six frequencies. I also dont seem to get the Poplar frequencies on the Doniphan site.
I cant get the Van Buren site to come in even on a good day anymore.
I also am having trouble getting the Van Buren site this is why I am not sure of its NAC.
A few NAC 's are
1C8 Poplar Bluff
1C6 Doniphan
1C6 Sikeston
1C7 Bloomfield
1C1 Bakersville
Do you know why both Doniphan and Sikeston share the same NAC? I wonder if it has anything to do with both Doniphan and Bloomfield sites having the 199 adjacent site which I believe is a 700 MHz mobile repeater. I think Sikeston is a 700 MHz system.