Especially on AM where the property values of the land exceed the station worth.OTA radio will be a memory this decade. It's on borrowed time. Advertising revenue alone cannot support the business model. AM, FM and OTA TV days are numbered.
As I mentioned, if the antennas are on "protected" land (Nature preserve, open spaces etc.) that can't be developed (and taxed as such), it might make financial sense.Especially on AM where the property values of the land exceed the station worth.
In houston, they are doing a lot of diplexing of AM stations into single site master antennas and selling off the old station land.
I don't mean to be too conspiratorial-ist. But generally radio is listened to by people driving and working (although I listen for the fun of it). This is the last group of people that some would want to have access to news.Well this bites the supreme big one. WCBS 880 gave you the news with no hint of political bias. I certainly preferred it over WINS which was too ‘sterile’ for me. WCBS was solid. Not too much, not too little. I deleted it from any presets that had it. I have no use for yet ANOTHER station in the New York City area with guys who don’t play sports *****ing about those who do.
It‘s really sad what Audacy has done to radio in this country. It’s as if they are TRYING to kill terrestrial radio. Especially AM which I believe is still valid and has better reach than FM and not subject to the moody whims of the internet infrastructure.
Whatever. Not much one can do about it except mourn.
Not sure about bias..they all have it to some degree, but I too grew up with wcbs and listened all over the northeast. I agree about the radio industry, but today is today and terrestrial radio has a place but much reduced from the past and as much as many of us liked and used AM radio, it is generally becoming not profitable in many markets and those are the sad facts. AM radio‘s reach really does not factor into plans very much anymore.Well this bites the supreme big one. WCBS 880 gave you the news with no hint of political bias. I certainly preferred it over WINS which was too ‘sterile’ for me. WCBS was solid. Not too much, not too little. I deleted it from any presets that had it. I have no use for yet ANOTHER station in the New York City area with guys who don’t play sports *****ing about those who do.
It‘s really sad what Audacy has done to radio in this country. It’s as if they are TRYING to kill terrestrial radio. Especially AM which I believe is still valid and has better reach than FM and not subject to the moody whims of the internet infrastructure.
Whatever. Not much one can do about it except mourn.
Well if I were to chose which one to dump it would have been WINS. Fewer folks would have missed that station.Not sure about bias..they all have it to some degree, but I too grew up with wcbs and listened all over the northeast. I agree about the radio industry, but today is today and terrestrial radio has a place but much reduced from the past and as much as many of us liked and used AM radio, it is generally becoming not profitable in many markets and those are the sad facts. AM radio‘s reach really does not factor into plans very much anymore.
Broadcasting is still a business and must survive on profit. I do not like Audacity either, but they are motivated by the same market conditions and profitability requirements as other businesses which are radically different from even 10 years ago.
OTA radio will still be here in the 2030's, AM radio included. The number of AM stations will decline, and FM will turn more religious and ethnic as the dominance of younger demographics -- who get their audio entertainment and news from their smartphone -- will increase.OTA radio will be a memory this decade. It's on borrowed time. Advertising revenue alone cannot support the business model. AM, FM and OTA TV days are numbered.
I've been thinking of this, and it's always dangerous to try and predict the future....OTA radio will still be here in the 2030's, AM radio included. The number of AM stations will decline, and FM will turn more religious and ethnic as the dominance of younger demographics -- who get their audio entertainment and news from their smartphone -- will increase.
Their days are numbered -- yes, definitely. All traditional media -- radio, TV, movies, newspapers, magazines -- are all being replaced. That's not going to stop.
But versions of them will still be around in the 2030's. 2040's? Your guess is probably as good as mine.
There is merit to the KISS principle. It wasn't too long ago that some of the auto manufacturers were looking to rid their vehicles of AM radio but fortunately, there was push back. On many of my drives around the USA, I've seen signs directing drivers to local conditions via a local AM station. It's a simple and efficient way to distribute information when needed.I've been thinking of this, and it's always dangerous to try and predict the future....
How many times have "Tanks" been written off by military thinkers.
Thanks
Joel
Are you sure they were reruns? Maybe it was the "REAL" Art Bell, broadcasting from deep within a hidden, undisclosed bunker. (They do make for entertaining listening sometimes)I was recently doing a very late night long drive through the very northern edge of California, and while there were many AM stations on the air, 50% of them were all airing the same reruns of Art Bell.
Are you sure they were reruns? Maybe it was the "REAL" Art Bell, broadcasting from deep within a hidden, undisclosed bunker. (They do make for entertaining listening sometimes)