- Joined
- Feb 22, 2007
- Messages
- 6,377
Very interesting but unnecessarily cryptic twist here. Just to add a little bit of clarity. You are obviously referring to Frank Powers being shot down in his U-2 spy plane over the USSR in May 1960. Although he had been an Air Force captain he was a CIA pilot at that point. He should not have been captured. He should have taken out his "coin" and used it. That is a poison injection, prior to doing that he should have pressed the "red" button which would have detonated and destroyed the spy camera and its contents.Which is the funny part?
Speculation, or government propaganda press release?
Some actions are signals only.
Did the Russians shoot down one of our super-secret high-altitude reconnaissance plane inside their borders?
Our President himself denied it.
Then the Russians produced the pilot who very inconveniently survived.
The “rebuttal” itself isn’t honest AS a rebuttal. It’s of but ONE line of speculation, and presented overblown, at that. (The form of a lie).
How tax moneys are spent is a Constitutional requirement. Secrecy is limited to ongoing foreign relations only. And is then subject to review by the Senate.
“Doesn’t have the budget”, is contempt. Signal.
You’re being played from both ends (is the game).
A E6 Mercury is a signal and much more
On 9-11 the President literally disappeared, and the Vice President was in charge of national security from an undisclosed location.
Think an E6 was scrambled that day? Other nuclear powers are alerted in advance it takes off.
“Signal sent” has little or nothing to do with powerless American voters. What’s said to be “routine” is after-the-fact.
.
The first surface-to-air missile exploded near the plane dislodging the tail and right wing, he had time to to do the necessary tasks. He did not use the ejection seat but instead bailed out at 70 plus thousand feet.
He was captured and disarmed by a group of farmers, convicted of espionage but in 1962 was exchanged for the notorious Russian spy Rudolf Abel.
It's ironic that he died in a 1977 crash as a news Chopper pilot in California. Encino I think.
After the initial statements of no such flyovers are authorized President Eisenhower was cornered and eventually did not deny that the flights were happening and had been happening. Eisenhower refused to apologize to Nikita Khrushchev for the flyovers, that was a very costly action but very understandable. "Ike" was one tough bird having been a five-star general and supreme commander of the Allied Forces in World War II.
It caused Nikita Khrushchev to walk out of the Paris Summit negotiations where a nuclear test ban treaty was to be signed. It increased cold war tensions that led to the building of the Berlin Wall.
I guess what I'm saying is there's not a whole lot to be read into this or a few of the other things you mentioned, it just turned out to be one big charlie foxtrot.