Alameda Contra Costa joint radio system

Status
Not open for further replies.

cquirk

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2004
Messages
23
Location
San Ramon
Emergency radio close to reality
Alameda, Contra Costa to integrate communication between public safety agencies
By Chris Metinko, MEDIANEWS STAFF
Article Last Updated: 05/02/2007 02:37:50 AM PDT

Alameda and Contra Costa counties officials moved a step closer Tuesday to eliminating potential communication breakdowns during the next Bay Area disaster.
The boards of supervisors of both counties approved the formation of a joint powers authority between the counties that would manage the implementation and operation of the digital regional radio system. This system would allow public safety agencies in both counties to communicate directly with each other via radio.
While such communication may seem fundamental, it's rarely the case in either county. There are a handful of different radio systems emergency services use in the East Bay, none of which are easily compatible with one another.

For instance, Alameda County Fire and Sheriff's departments cannot communicate directly with their Oakland or Berkeley counterparts. Instead, the departments have to rely on "black boxes" that capture signals from disparate radio systems. However, that equipment has limitations, such as a finite range of where the boxes will work.
That is just one example of the emergency radio problems caused by incompatible systems and overcrowded frequencies across the East Bay. Nobody uses the same band of radio frequencies as the California Highway Patrol, except the East Bay Regional Park District. Walnut Creek, Pleasant Hill, Pinole, Concord, Clayton, Pittsburg, Hercules and Martinez police cannot contact their own cities' fire departments via radio. In Richmond, police can't radio Contra Costa County sheriff's deputies.

The communication breakdown was evident during the 1991 Oakland and Berkeley hills fire. Firefighters from surrounding communities converged on the scene, but couldn't communicate with each other.

Commander Rocky Medeiros of the Alameda County Sheriff's Office said formation of the new authority is a huge step in connecting the two counties and eliminating a dangerous communication gap that could prove costly during the next emergency.

"If you look at any man-made or natural disaster that has occurred, the number-one issue in responding has been communication," Medeiros said.

The regional radio system between counties is expected to cost $60 million, and federal and state grant money will pay for some of it. However, local jurisdictions that participate in the radio system will be responsible for a proportionate share of the remaining costs, and an ongoing subscriber fee will be charged for the system.

The new East Bay Regional Communications System joint powers authority will consist of a 23-member board of directors made up of representatives from a variety of public safety agencies and cities in both counties, as well as officials from the counties themselves.
In Contra Costa, Sheriff Warren Rupf and Supervisor John Gioia of Richmond questioned what they consider a large and potentially unwieldy number of board members, and whether decision-making could become impractical.

"I wonder how 23 of us are going to get to the important business of this project," Rupf said. "I'm not an advocate of more government and complicating things."
Supervisor Susan Bonilla, who served as Concord's mayor last year, said shrinking the JPA board's membership could send the wrong message to cities.
"Working together is imperative to the success of the project," she said. "You can't ask the cities to put up money and not have a voice at the table
 

Eng74

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,059
Location
Kern County, CA
Looks like a step in the right direction. I have to agree 23 board members is a few too many. I can understand that while you are developing the system everyone who is in at the start, should have a say in what the system should do. Once that is done I do not think it should be more than 7. It almost sounds like if you are in the system you are on the board. Also looks like the 96/2096 and 396 are going to be working more and more.
 

trooperdude

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Nov 25, 2003
Messages
1,506
Location
SFO Bay Area and Las Vegas NV
Too many cooks

DHS is strongly encouraging REGIONAL solutions for grant $$$ these days, thus
the push for regional systems.

Looks like everybody is getting ready for their slice of the 700mhz pie
once it's available.

23 is un-manageable for a working group.

They need to look south to ICIS in LA County for a workable model and a
Joint Powers Authority.
 

linuxwrangler

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2006
Messages
233
Location
Contra Costa County, CA
Probably system cost

rlp925 said:
$ 3,300 PER RADIO??? These must be nice radios!!!

I'm pretty sure that the cost "per radio" is not the actual cost of the radio but the radio plus an apportioned cost of the 31 transmitter sites along with the hardwire and microwave links between the sites and out to all the supported dispatch centers.

Sort of the way the cost "per PC" in a company has to take into account an apportioned cost of the cabling, network gear, servers along with the associated power, space and cooling required to support the PC.
 

selgaran

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
Messages
398
Location
CM98dn
linuxwrangler said:
I'm pretty sure that the cost "per radio" is not the actual cost of the radio but the radio plus an apportioned cost of the 31 transmitter sites along with the hardwire and microwave links between the sites and out to all the supported dispatch centers.

Um, no. That's a mid-range price for a Motorola P-25 trunking mobile radio. That may not even be the "installed" price.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top