All my RX path questions

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,319
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
The path loss calculators are going to give you what you asked for which is loss in dB. Some calculators let you put in antenna gain or loss but you need one that also includes starting power at the transmitter and resulting power at the receiver in dBm, which is dB referenced to one milliwatt which is also 0dBm.

If you can't find a path loss calculator that lets you enter transmit power in watts or dBm then you can use this converter for watts to dBm, but you have to start with a power level at the transmitter to get power into the receiver in dBm. RF Power Conversion Calculator

So pick a power level to start with that you think the transmitting station would be using. Lets say its 50 watts just to get started and that calculates to 46.99dBm. Now we have something in dBm to start with and subtract that from your path loss example of 109.4dB but since that is a loss call it -109.4dB, so -109.4 of loss plus 46.99dBm of transmit power leaves you with -62.41dBm of signal present at the receive antenna and its the first time we have it in dBm because we started with something in dBm.

Now add the antenna gain minus feedline loss at the transmitter site. Lets use 6dBi of antenna gain minus 1.5dB of feedline loss which would reduce the transmit antenna gain to 4.5dBi. Add that 4.5dB to the calculated receive signal available at the antenna which would be -62.41dBm plus 4.5dB of antenna gain/feedline loss which is now -57.9dBm or a higher level at the receive antenna due to added transmit antenna gain with feedline loss.

Now add your receive antenna gain minus feedline loss at the receive end. You have a Remtronix antenna right on a handheld and I estimate that antenna to have about 2dBi of gain with no feedline loss in this case so add that to the receive level present at the antenna which now makes it the original -57.9dBm present at the antenna plus 2dBi Remtronix gain equal -55.91dBm into your scanner receiver.

Now replace that Remtronix with say an 11dBi gain Yagi with 2dB of feedline loss giving a net result of 9dBi receive gain. So going back to the original level present at the antenna which was -57.9dBm plus 9dBi antenna gain including feedline loss you would have -48.9dBm into your scanner receiver with the 11dBi Yagi, or 7dB more signal than what the Remtronix antenna provides, not counting the Yagi possible being higher on the roof and in the clear compared to the Remtronix inside your house with some loss through the walls.

The Pasternack path loss calculator appears to be free space as in space with no earth or buildings or trees involved, which is not realistic except for calculating signals from space. The other calculator that lets you choose a rural area might give a more realistic idea of levels between two points on earth but I don't know the difference between the Egli or Hata results or which one to use with my examples above.

Also, my examples are how my brain looks at things and there are other ways to add or subtract the info but the end result should be the same.
 

Bonkk083

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2023
Messages
804
Location
Union, SC
The path loss calculators are going to give you what you asked for which is loss in dB. Some calculators let you put in antenna gain or loss but you need one that also includes starting power at the transmitter and resulting power at the receiver in dBm, which is dB referenced to one milliwatt which is also 0dBm.

If you can't find a path loss calculator that lets you enter transmit power in watts or dBm then you can use this converter for watts to dBm, but you have to start with a power level at the transmitter to get power into the receiver in dBm. RF Power Conversion Calculator

So pick a power level to start with that you think the transmitting station would be using. Lets say its 50 watts just to get started and that calculates to 46.99dBm. Now we have something in dBm to start with and subtract that from your path loss example of 109.4dB but since that is a loss call it -109.4dB, so -109.4 of loss plus 46.99dBm of transmit power leaves you with -62.41dBm of signal present at the receive antenna and its the first time we have it in dBm because we started with something in dBm.

Now add the antenna gain minus feedline loss at the transmitter site. Lets use 6dBi of antenna gain minus 1.5dB of feedline loss which would reduce the transmit antenna gain to 4.5dBi. Add that 4.5dB to the calculated receive signal available at the antenna which would be -62.41dBm plus 4.5dB of antenna gain/feedline loss which is now -57.9dBm or a higher level at the receive antenna due to added transmit antenna gain with feedline loss.

Now add your receive antenna gain minus feedline loss at the receive end. You have a Remtronix antenna right on a handheld and I estimate that antenna to have about 2dBi of gain with no feedline loss in this case so add that to the receive level present at the antenna which now makes it the original -57.9dBm present at the antenna plus 2dBi Remtronix gain equal -55.91dBm into your scanner receiver.

Now replace that Remtronix with say an 11dBi gain Yagi with 2dB of feedline loss giving a net result of 9dBi receive gain. So going back to the original level present at the antenna which was -57.9dBm plus 9dBi antenna gain including feedline loss you would have -48.9dBm into your scanner receiver with the 11dBi Yagi, or 7dB more signal than what the Remtronix antenna provides, not counting the Yagi possible being higher on the roof and in the clear compared to the Remtronix inside your house with some loss through the walls.

The Pasternack path loss calculator appears to be free space as in space with no earth or buildings or trees involved, which is not realistic except for calculating signals from space. The other calculator that lets you choose a rural area might give a more realistic idea of levels between two points on earth but I don't know the difference between the Egli or Hata results or which one to use with my examples above.

Also, my examples are how my brain looks at things and there are other ways to add or subtract the info but the end result should be the same.
I put in 100 watts = 50 dbm
If I did the math right it's 60.1dbm, tx gain 10 dbi and rx gain 11 dbi
 
Last edited:

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,319
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I put in 100 watts = 50 dbm
If I did the math right it's 60.1dbm, tx gain 10 dbi and rx gain 11 dbi
Doesn't sound right since I had a larger number of -48.9dBm with a 6dB transmit antenna and 11dB of receive antenna with a little feedline loss. The receive level at the antenna is a negative number so when you add antenna gain it gets less negative. Like -50dBm plus 10dB of antenna gain would leave you with -40dBm, which is a larger number than -50dBm.

I don't trust the Pasternack path loss calculator for terrestrial use and it would be good if you can find what the difference is between Egli and Hata numbers in the other calculator. I suspect one of those may be better suited for what you need.
 

Bonkk083

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2023
Messages
804
Location
Union, SC
Doesn't sound right since I had a larger number of -48.9dBm with a 6dB transmit antenna and 11dB of receive antenna with a little feedline loss. The receive level at the antenna is a negative number so when you add antenna gain it gets less negative. Like -50dBm plus 10dB of antenna gain would leave you with -40dBm, which is a larger number than -50dBm.

I don't trust the Pasternack path loss calculator for terrestrial use and it would be good if you can find what the difference is between Egli and Hata numbers in the other calculator. I suspect one of those may be better suited for what you need.
Should it be less or more than what I come up with
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,319
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Should it be less or more than what I come up with
If you calculate using antennas with more gain then the number will be less negative than my example. Think about what I said in my last post.

"The receive level at the antenna is a negative number so when you add antenna gain it gets less negative. Like -50dBm plus 10dB of antenna gain would leave you with -40dBm, which is a larger number than -50dBm".
 

merlin

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,557
Location
DN32su
Path loss calculations are only accurate in free space like a light beam path. Real world terrestrial, you have to consider absorbtion, line of sight, and terrain.
 

Ubbe

Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2006
Messages
10,148
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
Also consider a receivers sensitivity when calculating how much one would hear. All scanners loose sensitivity when connected to a big gain antenna. How much depends of the scanners quality. If I measure a small portable scanner like Icom R2 it has an impressive sensitivty, something like 0,15uV, that equals -125dBm. When I connect it to a moderate 6dBd gain antenna on a high rise building a measure a 15uV sensitivity, that equals to -85dBm, a 40dB loss. If I do the same measurement with a Pro2006 scanner it initially has a 0,5uV sensitivity, -113dBm, which is pretty bad. But with that roof antenna connected it only loose sensitivity to 0,6uV, -111dBm, a 2dB loss.

SDS scanners use a RF AGC circuit that reduce its gain when it detects strong RF signals in the frequency band to not let it go too much into overload and create intermodulation issues. When using a directional antenna instead of omni you can reduce those other interfering signals and make the scanner have a better sensitivity. And even more so if a bandpass filter can be used or a notch filter to suppress the biggest interfering source.

With that poor Icom R2 receiver I could probably have used a variable attenuator and reduced the antenna signal until I got the best reception, or used its own built in fixed attenuator, and that could have resulted in something like 5uV instead of 15uV.

If you have interference from local electrical and electronic devices they could produce a noise level at -100dBm and if you try and receive a signal that has gone down to -105dBm it would drown from that interference level and cannot be heard with whatever antenna gain being used. If it was a single source of interference, perhaps an arcing insulator at a power line, then a second antenna that receives that interference can be used connected to a noise canceller, that can be adjusted to let the level of interference be the same as from the original antenna but in the opposite phase and then the two signals are added, would almost totally remove that interference and would make it possible to receive that -105dBm signal with good quality.

So it is not as easy as getting the biggest gain antenna possible, even if that usually are the best solution, but could also include other things to consider when trying to improve reception.

/Ubbe
 

Bonkk083

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2023
Messages
804
Location
Union, SC
Since the tower is 36 miles should I just put my money with a yagi instead of a omni
 

kb1ejw

Local Idiot
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 19, 2005
Messages
51
Location
Western Hemisphere
I have a yagi like the one you specified, and it works pretty good. I tried an omni with low satisfaction for my purpose. 35 miles is a stretch unless you have flat land between you, or you are up on a mountain. What system are you looking to receive? I have a SDS200 in Newberry SC, and I have a homemade antenna in the window tuned to 850mhz with "OK" results trying to listen to Palmetto 800, and the closest site is a couple miles or so. .. Here in MA, the yagi performs well picking up the State Police site about 14 miles away, where the omni didn't work nearly as well.
 

Bonkk083

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2023
Messages
804
Location
Union, SC
I have a yagi like the one you specified, and it works pretty good. I tried an omni with low satisfaction for my purpose. 35 miles is a stretch unless you have flat land between you, or you are up on a mountain. What system are you looking to receive? I have a SDS200 in Newberry SC, and I have a homemade antenna in the window tuned to 850mhz with "OK" results trying to listen to Palmetto 800, and the closest site is a couple miles or so. .. Here in MA, the yagi performs well picking up the State Police site about 14 miles away, where the omni didn't work nearly as well.
The Greenville Palmetto 800 site in Simpsonville the tower is 299' plus 853' elevation together that's about 500' higher than my location
 

G7RUX

Active Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2021
Messages
676
The best performance you can afford for the installation.
What length? What antenna are you feeding it with?
What are you hoping to receive with it? Can you use a filtered preamp for just 800 MHz or do you intend to use it over a wider frequency range?
 

Bonkk083

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2023
Messages
804
Location
Union, SC
The best performance you can afford for the installation.
What length? What antenna are you feeding it with?
What are you hoping to receive with it? Can you use a filtered preamp for just 800 MHz or do you intend to use it over a wider frequency range?
I'm planning on is 50' and for as a antenna I'm not sure what to get it's between a 11 dbi omni or a 13-15 dbi yagi the tower is 36 miles just 851-860 MHz
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
26,536
Location
United States
50 feet of LMR-400 at 850MHz is going to result in about a 1/3rd of your signal lost in the cable before it gets to your radio.
50 feet of LMR-600 at 850MHz is going to result in about a 1/4 of your signal lost in the cable.

LMR-400 is about the lowest grade cable I'd run for that length at 800MHz. It is flexible and not hard to run in a residential installation.
LMR-600 will get more signal from the antenna to the radio. It's stiffer and a bit harder to work with and will cost you a bit more.

You should consider the installation, how you are going to route the cable and what your budget is. There isn't one solution that works for everyone.
 

Bonkk083

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 3, 2023
Messages
804
Location
Union, SC
50 feet of LMR-400 at 850MHz is going to result in about a 1/3rd of your signal lost in the cable before it gets to your radio.
50 feet of LMR-600 at 850MHz is going to result in about a 1/4 of your signal lost in the cable.

LMR-400 is about the lowest grade cable I'd run for that length at 800MHz. It is flexible and not hard to run in a residential installation.
LMR-600 will get more signal from the antenna to the radio. It's stiffer and a bit harder to work with and will cost you a bit more.

You should consider the installation, how you are going to route the cable and what your budget is. There isn't one solution that works for everyone.
What is the diameter difference
 
Top