Pele
Member
I maintain a radio system that includes multiple above ground simulcast transmitting sites, as well as an extensive underground distributed antenna system. It is a trunked system that runs in the 490 MHz UHF commercial band. We have several channels Above and below 495 MHz.
Our above ground system uses Motorola Quantar base stations. I notice that there is a different part number for the Power Amplifiers, Exciters, and Receivers dependent of if they are a Range 3 or a Range 4 unit. The cutoff for Range 3 and range 4 is around 495 MHz. This complicates things since we have to stock multiple types of parts.
Additionally, in the underground distributed antenna system, we have Bi-Directional Amplifiers. They are manufactured by several different manufacturers including Allen Telecomm (Defunct), Decibel (Defunct), Kaval (Defunct), PowerWave, Sinclair, and Andrew... (Hodgepodge of parts, dependent on age and/or replacement date.)
I've noticed that these too have a separate amplifier for high and low range. They use diplexers and filters to route the correct frequencies to the correct amplifier.
Is there a significance to 495 MHz? Why is all the active RF equipment divided at this point?
Is it possible to get an amplifier that will do between 488-502 MHz in one package?
Trying to reduce points of failure here.
Our above ground system uses Motorola Quantar base stations. I notice that there is a different part number for the Power Amplifiers, Exciters, and Receivers dependent of if they are a Range 3 or a Range 4 unit. The cutoff for Range 3 and range 4 is around 495 MHz. This complicates things since we have to stock multiple types of parts.
Additionally, in the underground distributed antenna system, we have Bi-Directional Amplifiers. They are manufactured by several different manufacturers including Allen Telecomm (Defunct), Decibel (Defunct), Kaval (Defunct), PowerWave, Sinclair, and Andrew... (Hodgepodge of parts, dependent on age and/or replacement date.)
I've noticed that these too have a separate amplifier for high and low range. They use diplexers and filters to route the correct frequencies to the correct amplifier.
Is there a significance to 495 MHz? Why is all the active RF equipment divided at this point?
Is it possible to get an amplifier that will do between 488-502 MHz in one package?
Trying to reduce points of failure here.