ElroyJetson
Getting tired of all the stupidity.
Obviously some people have a rather cavalier attitude toward the subject at hand, thinking, and saying, essentially, "Oh, it's not such a big deal. Either he does it or he doesn't do it, what business it is of yours?" And then there are those like myself who tend to take this matter far more seriously, as I believe it fully JUSTIFIES.
Mess with a public safety trunked system and you run the risk of accidentally (or even intentionally) interfering with communications under situations which can involve safety of life for first responders and others. It'd be just great (sarcasm) if you were to accidentally disrupt communications in an active fire scene with firemen in a burning building undergoing collapse. Imagine if it was YOUR transmission that kept them from reaching safety and dying because of it.
Yes that's an extreme example but most definitely not out of the realm of possibility.
I'll never apologize for saying what, if taken as good advice, might help to avoid a problem for first responders.
YOU don't need to be listening. Neither do I. If I am to do so, I insist on doing so in a purely passive, listen only method, and being SURE that I'm not wrong about it. It's not unfair that I should ask that others who wish to also listen in should take great care to also ensure that their equipment only listens passively as well.
It won't take too many more instances of someone making the news for interfering with a radio system from just this sort of shenanigans with a radio and programming software obtained off ebay, for me to start fully supporting all measures to encrypt public safety systems and also migrate to full usage of radio authentication.
Mess with a public safety trunked system and you run the risk of accidentally (or even intentionally) interfering with communications under situations which can involve safety of life for first responders and others. It'd be just great (sarcasm) if you were to accidentally disrupt communications in an active fire scene with firemen in a burning building undergoing collapse. Imagine if it was YOUR transmission that kept them from reaching safety and dying because of it.
Yes that's an extreme example but most definitely not out of the realm of possibility.
I'll never apologize for saying what, if taken as good advice, might help to avoid a problem for first responders.
YOU don't need to be listening. Neither do I. If I am to do so, I insist on doing so in a purely passive, listen only method, and being SURE that I'm not wrong about it. It's not unfair that I should ask that others who wish to also listen in should take great care to also ensure that their equipment only listens passively as well.
It won't take too many more instances of someone making the news for interfering with a radio system from just this sort of shenanigans with a radio and programming software obtained off ebay, for me to start fully supporting all measures to encrypt public safety systems and also migrate to full usage of radio authentication.