Do they still do house sirens in Baltimore County? Many of those had tone-based controls - particularly those not mounted on station houses.My understanding is that all FSA equipment is now running on MachAlert or whichever SCADA-based medium BCoFD has gone to. The only thing paging controls is pagers now. So to create an entire new paging plan wouldn't be terribly burdensome.
Do they still do house sirens in Baltimore County? Many of those had tone-based controls - particularly those not mounted on station houses.
Which tones are you monitoring on? Just curious.
I have loaned my G4 to a friend who is testing it for his company, and will be reprogramming a few other G4s privately owned by members there (used as scanners) to function as pagers.Well, in the off chance anyone in Baltimore County OIT or FD sysadmins read this, the P25 paging on a Unication is working flawlessly for us. Please do not turn it off! If there is an official secret beta group currently testing this out, please send me a DM. I’ve got 3 other members in our station now using P25 paging as we conduct our own beta test. And now everyone wants a Unication. Keep up the great work this is the way to do it. A unified radio for paging and monitoring communications while enroute on calls will save lives.
I have loaned my G4 to a friend who is testing it for his company, and will be reprogramming a few other G4s privately owned by members there (used as scanners) to function as pagers.
I monitored all three battalion chief tone groups yesterday for about 16 hours and had flawless activation as well. One concern, looking at the BCoFD pager tone table, as compared to Unication's "ideal" tones for two-tone over P25 throughput, is that some are close to border of the tone range. Maybe I'll cycle through each station's tone pair and see how it goes.
I was really surprised that the fast duo-tone format timing was making the grade, since such a small snippet of the tone is audible on P25, but it's definitely working.
If you really get into the pre- and post- behavior, you could even tell the pager to switch scan lists based on which tone decoded. For example, west battalion tone decodes, scan Tac22. The possibilities are endless. This is def good stuff. And I was impressed at how loud and robust the alert tones are.Same here. I think I’m using 200ms durations for short and long. Funny you mention chief tones. Now that I have this working, I can get creative. I was thinking of setting up a knob for box alarms that would alert with a custom TTS such as “<beep beep> <WEST / CENTRAL / EAST> <BOX>. I would do that without voice record and pick a specific color scheme, in addition to our station fire and medic tones (which do use voice record and display red for fire alerts and blue for medic alerts).
I think I’m using 200ms durations for short and long. I actually think this is by design - the short tones. If you think about it, P25 is digital. It is crystal clear transmission. In the days of analog with all the static and all, you needed a longer tone to make sure you vibrate the reed (so to speak - I am going way back). With digital, you just need enough tone length for the microprocessor to recognize the frequency. I don't think they simply ran a patch cable from the 46.46 transmitter to the P25 "aux in" . I think this is a planned upgrade and clever RadioReference users found the TG and here we are as early adopters. And I think it is great that its actually happening.
Funny you mention chief tones. Now that I have this working, I can get creative. I was thinking of setting up a knob for box alarms that would alert with a custom TTS such as “<beep beep> <WEST / CENTRAL / EAST> <BOX>. I would do that without voice record and pick a specific color scheme, in addition to our station fire and medic tones (which do use voice record and display red for fire alerts and blue for medic alerts). You answered my first question which was "do the chief tones work"!
This is slightly ot, but I'm working on a project in the Baltimore area and I'm trying to find an efficient way to program the G5 for fire ops. I can devote one zone (8 knob positions) to the system. Currently I use one knob position to monitor the dispatch and ops tgs (the radio scans between them, prioritizing the dispatch tg.) I don't have any incident tgs programmed atm. I'm a bit confused why there are 4 ops tgs, but only 3 battalions with two incident tg sets each - can anyone add some context?
Does the county still use the North Ops tg (9452)?Central-East-West for standard runs. Tac 1-2, 2-2, 3-2 (South) for tactical incidents (fires, rescues, hazmat.) Additionally, Tac 4-2, 5-2, & 6-2 for additional incidents within the battalion. Example, a central firebox would be on 1-2 but if an additional central box would to drop, it would operate on 4-2.
Does the county still use the North Ops tg (9452)?
The "North" talk group was put into place when P25 went live and the northern part of the county was operating on a separate RFSS. The idea was, that if site trunking occurred, and the main RFSS and north RFSS became disconnected, the "NORTH" talk group would be the divisional response talk group for units in that area. Evidentially, in a Moto 7.x system, wide area talk groups must have a revert RFSS for site trunking. When the northern RFSS was absorbed into the main one, they recycled this talk group for their two-tone beta. This is also why many of the TAC talk groups were labeled N or S as they would only work on those RFSSs during site trunking.Does the county still use the North Ops tg (9452)?
I've always liked Baltimore County's paging format, as far a timing goes. The only thing I didn't like (and I didn't know I didn't like it until I ended up in another county with longer B-tones) is the short burst of alerting that you get out of a Minitor.
Example, a central firebox would be on 1-2 but if an additional central box would to drop, it would operate on 4-2
Baltimore County also used to have more then 3 battalions. Talk about maybe adding more has happened ever since the number was reduced.This is slightly ot, but I'm working on a project in the Baltimore area and I'm trying to find an efficient way to program the G5 for fire ops. I can devote one zone (8 knob positions) to the system. Currently I use one knob position to monitor the dispatch and ops tgs (the radio scans between them, prioritizing the dispatch tg.) I don't have any incident tgs programmed atm. I'm a bit confused why there are 4 ops tgs, but only 3 battalions with two incident tg sets each - can anyone add some context?