Best scanner to look into, not SDS Series?

a727469

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2003
Messages
451
Location
Maine
Thinking about getting another scanner which would you suggest between the 996p2 the TRX-2 or the 536hp?
Simple. 996. No whistler as previously mentioned. Many like the 536 for many good reasons, but for a simple, dependable all around scanner the 996 is it and I have owned the 536 and sold. I assume no simulcast.
 

rf_patriot200

Active Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2024
Messages
562
Location
Freeport, Illinois
I was actually waiting for one of the many responses that have been hammered out in numerous other threads, from you. Hence as to why I stated, "I can't wait to hear this...I'm all ears." Maybe that came off wrong, but wasn't the intention.

I was merely, awaiting one of the numerous responses I've read in hundreds of threads.

I can say, what I am getting at,overall, is the fact that the front is is horrible in the SDS series. It's noted, very heavily, in many threads. This allowing obviously for interferences to plague the SDS scanners. It also doesn't decode weak signal well at all. You can't "Tweak" anything to change those things...

Filters had been a major problem. Seems my issues with having to change the filter had to do with my interference/s, from whatever they were coming from. Changed my outdoor antenna back to Remtronix 843b back-of-set antenna, and set the filters (by ear) and have been running very well, with very minimal issues, as opposed to the overwhelming amount of issue I was experiencing.

I can say, I am running well. If I could get my outdoor antenna issue corrected, (things seem to tend to lean towards interferences. And maybe needing to be raised higher) I will keep the SDS, but still very interested in the 536hp or 996p2, leaning towards 536hp.

Anyways. That's simply where I was at with my post. Can't change or tweak the front end issue. But, maybe my area is just working against me differently than most...
Exactly. I think it has a lot to with the interference sources you might have in your area, compared to other SDS users in their area. I have no real issues like that here, no simulcast or otherwise and the SDS works great for me.
 

AngWay

Curious
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
866
Location
GRUNDY
Yes, the technology sometimes limits sdr receivers. I do understand that everyone’s experience and location affect reception and that is why I say this is my experience only. I will go with you on the interference argument depending on location, but not the decode since I have some somewhat difficult sites to receive and the 200 and my 996 are equal.
However, like most things in life, we all must judge based on our own usage of a product and based upon a majority of users who are happy with it. All products have + and -. That is not to say that those who are not happy are wrong, but taking the good with the bad, the majority rules.👍👎
In the end, it is what makes you happy and opinions are just opinions! I am glad things are running ok for you. One way or the other, I suggest not to fret too much and just enjoy!😺
One last “opinion”. Get the 996!❗️
I think i am gonna get the 996 looking back after i bought the sds100 already i think i should have gone with a 536hp or the 996. i didn't even know about the 996 until like 3 days ago lol. but everyone seems to like it over the sds. idk
 

AngWay

Curious
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
866
Location
GRUNDY
"Everyone" not plagued with simulcast problems...maybe
I have been looking around and reading about the 996p2 i see conflicting answers so maybe u or someone else here knows. But does the 996p2 decode dmr and nxdn?
What about the 996xt does it decode dmr and nxdn?

The 996p2 interface like the programming and the way it scans is it more like the older scanners like the pro 652 or is it the newer once like the sds series?
 

StoliRaz

🇺🇲
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
940
996p2 yes to DMR yes to NXDN with the paid License for each
996xt NO to DMR NO to NXDN
Don't overlook the 996T either. It has less bells and whistles than the XT variant but picks up P25 P1 well. Can be had cheaper in most cases
 

AngWay

Curious
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
866
Location
GRUNDY
Don't overlook the 996T either. It has less bells and whistles than the XT variant but picks up P25 P1 well. Can be had cheaper in most cases
Yea well i was just looking at that chart that @Whiskey3JMC sent and i had no idea that the BCD325P2 was capable of all of that it does dmr nxdn p25 i had no clue. anyone know if it does trunked dmr and nxdn? and the interface looks like the older scanners unlike what the sds100 looks like. has anybody here had the BCD325P2? if so what do u think about it?
 

StoliRaz

🇺🇲
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
940
Yea well i was just looking at that chart that @Whiskey3JMC sent and i had no idea that the BCD325P2 was capable of all of that it does dmr nxdn p25 i had no clue. anyone know if it does trunked dmr and nxdn? and the interface looks like the older scanners unlike what the sds100 looks like. has anybody here had the BCD325P2? if so what do u think about it?
325P2 is excellent, but only uses 2 batteries so it dies rather quickly. My one knock on it. Otherwise it works excellent
 

Whiskey3JMC

Just another lowly hobbyist
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 16, 2006
Messages
7,770
Location
Philly burbs 🇺🇸
i had no idea that the BCD325P2 was capable of all of that it does dmr nxdn p25 i had no clue. anyone know if it does trunked dmr and nxdn?
Yes, it trunk tracks DMR, NXDN & ProVoice if the applicable paid upgrades are activated

Clicking on the Magnifying Glass in the top right of the screen and searching the forums will provide all your answers.
So will the wiki below
 

AngWay

Curious
Joined
Sep 19, 2020
Messages
866
Location
GRUNDY
325P2 is excellent, but only uses 2 batteries so it dies rather quickly. My one knock on it. Otherwise it works excellent
I'm thinking maybe i should have went with the 325P2 over the sds100. i'll bet it even scans faster that the sds, i know my pro 652 does and it looks like it has the same interface .
 

dmfalk

Member
Joined
May 16, 2024
Messages
135
wow that is very interesting i read the link ... which do you think is better ?
I'd say the SDS units. For speed, they don't look fast, but that's because the screen refresh rate is something like 10 Hz (cycles per second), while they scan at 80 channels per second. Also, for sheer memory, the limitations are bigger than what you'd expect, or likely to ever use.
 

rf_patriot200

Active Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2024
Messages
562
Location
Freeport, Illinois
I'd say the SDS units. For speed, they don't look fast, but that's because the screen refresh rate is something like 10 Hz (cycles per second), while they scan at 80 channels per second. Also, for sheer memory, the limitations are bigger than what you'd expect, or likely to ever use.
Exactly ! Just for gigggles, I checked my memory capacity on my 200, and I've still got 6.54 Gb left after 3 years ! :)
 
Top