• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

CB repeaters?

Status
Not open for further replies.

d119

Patch & Channels Clear...
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,030
Reaction score
3,201
Location
EM1's guest house.
That is the repeater I was referring to, including some of the players involved.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,648
Reaction score
14,826
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Officially they don’t exist. Let’s hope it stays that way.
Awww, it was fun seeing all the commotion and pissed off CBers when the So Cal Pirate CB system was on air. My friend Larry (WA6SWG) who built and operated it was a hoot with his Hungarian accent and he was a talented CB design engineer with several Fanon Courier and Pace CBs that were his design. The Courier mobile tube type CB amplifier below from the 1970s was also his creation.

s-l1200.jpg


Here is a very old picture of Larry WA6SWG who built the Pirate Radio CB repeater system. I can still hear him punctuating a sentence with his typical vampire sounding Blaaa! He was quite a character.

1744859468763.jpeg
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
4,495
Location
Fort Worth
Awww, it was fun seeing all the commotion and pissed off CBers when the So Cal Pirate CB system was on air. My friend Larry (WA6SWG) who built and operated it was a hoot with his Hungarian accent and he was a talented CB design engineer with several Fanon Courier and Pace CBs that were his design. The Courier mobile tube type CB amplifier below from the 1970s was also his creation.

s-l1200.jpg


Here is a very old picture of Larry WA6SWG who built the Pirate Radio CB repeater system. I can still hear him punctuating a sentence with his typical vampire sounding Blaaa! He was quite a character.

View attachment 181906

My gripe (dead serious) is with interference on AM-19, The Travelers Channel, and I don’t care too much about the others.

AM-6, The Super Bowl, confines it antics to itself. That’s commendable.

118-possibilities to screw around and have fun (AM & SSB) if we leave out AM-9 & AM-19.

In time — (weird world oncoming re tech and the complete abandonment of our failed physics) — maybe other AM & SSB channels will gain use-adherents with a desired general topic.

I can’t say whether a repeater would be a good idea. But today I think it goes against WHY we most of us may prefer HF Radio over other types.

Seven League Boots.



.
 

RichardKramer

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Messages
2,139
Reaction score
4,994
Location
Reading, PA
I have two simplex repeaters, one is a radio shack; I have to check in the radio room what the other model is. They're for use with an ht as they have a two pin jack. I have to check on the timeout time; the RS has a set time, the other model has an adjustable timeout. If you exceed the timeout, the unit will start repeating at the end of the timeout. I'll have to try it on the cb channels, did use them on gmrs with a 20 watt amp into a 4 element beam.
 

kc2asb

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2015
Messages
2,247
Reaction score
3,620
Location
NYC Area
My gripe (dead serious) is with interference on AM-19, The Travelers Channel, and I don’t care too much about the others.

AM-6, The Super Bowl, confines it antics to itself. That’s commendable.

118-possibilities to screw around and have fun (AM & SSB) if we leave out AM-9 & AM-19.
(snip)

I recall that Channel 19 was generally respected in my area during the time I was very active (late 80's to late 90's). Lots of truckers were on it locally and someone always answered if you needed a quick radio check.

Curious if any public safety departments still monitor channel 9. Never heard much activity on 9, but they heyday of local departments monitoring it was mostly over by the time I was on the air.

Edit: @RichardKramer - a Radio Shack repeater is a new one to me. Sounds interesting!
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
4,495
Location
Fort Worth
I recall that Channel 19 was generally respected in my area during the time I was very active (late 80's to late 90's). Lots of truckers were on it locally and someone always answered if you needed a quick radio check.

Curious if any public safety departments still monitor channel 9. Never heard much activity on 9, but they heyday of local departments monitoring it was mostly over by the time I was on the air.

Edit: @RichardKramer - a Radio Shack repeater is a new one to me. Sounds interesting!

Almost doesn’t exist. I wouldn’t ever expect it.

.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
4,475
Reaction score
4,495
Location
Fort Worth
No surprise. *Maybe* it's still monitored in some rural areas by small departments. If anyone calls for assistance on the road now, it will likely be on Channel 19, but the majority will simply use their phones.

Until cell service isn’t available or phone fails.
Seen both and have helped both.

.
 

K9KLC

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
2,808
Reaction score
3,004
Location
Southwest, IL
Leaving the profession in 1988 I can't really comment as to what's happening today on CH 9, but I can tell you from 79-88. I worked for three different departments that all had CB's in the cars (truck in my case at one Dept) and at the dispatch centers. From 79-81, the sheriff's office I was at, probably got almost as many calls for assistance on the CB on CH 9 or 14, than we did on the phone. Believe it or not, at that time some people still didn't have phones in that area but almost everyone had a CB. We had the Motorola's that would monitor CH 9 and any other channel at the same time. Seemed we used those almost as much as the Low band VHF we had at the time, or at least close to it.

In the mid 80''s the small town I worked for seemed everyone had a scanner. We decided on occasion to dedicate a CB channel for back door coms and we'd say go to tac 2 which was ch 21 on the CB band. Everyone started calling the station to try and get that "tac 2" frequency. Was actually funny. Ah the good old days! :)
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,648
Reaction score
14,826
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
I have simplex repeater boxes from two other mfrs and one is US made. After using them for a few minutes you get really frustrated transmitting to them then waiting then everyone hears what you said in addition to the first live transmission, then somebody else transmits and waits and eventually hears what they said with most people hearing both the live and recorded version. I may have used both of mine twice then toss them in a drawer as they are a waste of time for me.

I suppose when the end of the world comes and all other repeaters are gone you could set one on a hilltop with a handheld and actually repeat comms further than simplex, but when the end of the world comes there are more important things to worry about than a simplex repeater.
 

WSAC829

Wisconsin Radio 225
Joined
Jan 13, 2024
Messages
567
Reaction score
1,206
Location
EN64ak
After using them for a few minutes you get really frustrated transmitting to them then waiting then everyone hears what you said in addition to the first live transmission, then somebody else transmits and waits and eventually hears what they said with most people hearing both the live and recorded version.
There is a simple fix for this. My portable ammo can GMRS repeater uses a Surecom SR-112 simplex repeater controller. What you do is set up your simplex repeater radio to use the actual offset for TX + RX frequencies. In my case GMRS (RX on 467.xxx + TX on 462.xxx). Then set up your portables/mobiles for repeater use using 467.xxx for TX and 462.xxx for RX like normal. This way nobody hears the transmissions twice. There is only the delay between transmissions before it rebroadcasts. This way it acts more like a normal repeater.

It also makes for a great way to range test your repeater. Drive around and see how far away you can still hear yourself.
 

gary123

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2002
Messages
3,106
Reaction score
1,553
Talking technically and legalities aside . You could make a CB repeater. Due to the narrow frequency range you would have a hard time making duplexers to allow operation with a100Khz to 300khz tx/rx split. There are duplexers used for 10m ham repeaters but modifying them to go 2Mhz below their designed tune range would be a challenge. Modifying such hardware to go up in frequency is 100 times easier than going down in frequency. Basically your fighting the fact that the lower frequency is a longer wavelength so everything need to physically bigger. If you were looking to do it. I would go with a split site configuration. One site for TX and one for RX. You could link the RX site to the TX site with a separate frequency or hardline or even VOIP.

Such a repeater can be AM or SSB although I do not recommend it as there is no easy way to select triggering the repeater such as a PL tone. FM would work fine as PL tone configured rep[eaters are old hat.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,648
Reaction score
14,826
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Talking technically and legalities aside . You could make a CB repeater. Due to the narrow frequency range you would have a hard time making duplexers to allow operation with a100Khz to 300khz tx/rx split. There are duplexers used for 10m ham repeaters but modifying them to go 2Mhz below their designed tune range would be a challenge. Modifying such hardware to go up in frequency is 100 times easier than going down in frequency. Basically your fighting the fact that the lower frequency is a longer wavelength so everything need to physically bigger. If you were looking to do it. I would go with a split site configuration. One site for TX and one for RX. You could link the RX site to the TX site with a separate frequency or hardline or even VOIP.

Such a repeater can be AM or SSB although I do not recommend it as there is no easy way to select triggering the repeater such as a PL tone. FM would work fine as PL tone configured rep[eaters are old hat.
I have a split site VOIP repeater right now that works perfect on CB if I wanted to do that, which I really don't. BTW it works perfect in SSB or any mode and can cross mode.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top