Can someone who is able to track the system update the database? I have a good list of tg's started but only a couple identified.
You would need it to follow the ProVoice talkgroups on both.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Is RR working on a fix so folks can actually submit findings to these EDACS Extended Addressing systems. The TG's which apparently don't translate to AFS Format? The radios will only display the DEC #'s... Regardless of your display preference.
EXAMPLE TG :
DEC# 20 AFS# 00-024 - Unknown
DEC# 4225 AFS# N/A - FD/EMS Dispatch
Anyone?
There is (was) a plan for the Somerset TGS on the FiRST patch to be encrypted on the FiRST side at the request of Somerset. If they will continue with that plan in light of the Uniden PV option remains to be seen as the development took system owners by surprise.I know Somerset law enforcement are using ProVoice but most of that can be heard on the patch to FiRST. What other users are using ProVoice in Worcester and Somerset and roughly how many talkgroups are ProVoice?
There is (was) a plan for the Somerset TGS on the FiRST patch to be encrypted on the FiRST side at the request of Somerset. If they will continue with that plan in light of the Uniden PV option remains to be seen as the development took system owners by surprise.
There are a number of PV talkgroups on the Worcester system. These are mostly LE TAC talkgroups. Each municipal PD has a "channel 2" that is PV and the Sheriff's Office has a number of PV talkgroups however most of those are encrypted.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Yes. No Encryption for Dispatch TGs.Has anyone successfully monitored Cecil County EDACS? Is it encrypted?
Has anyone successfully monitored Cecil County EDACS?
Is it encrypted?
Remember that verified talkgroups should go to the database; unknowns, as well as Radio IDs should be in the wiki. Questions about whether the DB can handle the extended addressing TGs should go to the Database forum.
I can set up the pages in the wiki for this if needed...Mike