It was a safe assumption because there were two possibilities. One, you are like my Ham friends who are petrified of the latest ham tech (digital, internet repeaters) mainly because it's way over their head. Two, you haven't actually heard a typical digital transmission on an average properly working network.
12dbinad, that makes no sense. Analog radio modes are still modulated and demodulated. Can your brain hear and demodulate 220 mhz FM?
what the hell is 220 millihertz and why pick on 220 anyway but maybe u meant to type MHz so I'll let it slide?
I guess p25 is so good and works much better than analog and that's why many public safety agencies in the Pacific Northwest are sticking with or going back to analog FM.
Talk to any Washington State patrol officer and tell them how much better P25 is compared to analog FM and I guarantee you'll get punched in the mouth.
Same goes for every other digital format such as DMR OR NXDN, another public safety agency ready to shoot their consultants is Woodburn Oregon Police for going with a crappy NXDN SYSTEM and now even with new Kenwood, NXDN/P25 equipment the frustration level of the officers has not improved one bit.
It's not just poor audio with P25 it's also coverage issues especially with simulcast systems.
The IWIN system in the Pacific Northwest for example worked so poorly For the Customs Air units that techs had to EITHER #1. change simulcast antenna patterns which resulted in numerous dead spots between coverage areas or #2, place simulcast towers within 10 miles of each other to reduce TDI which is not feasible or #3 reprogram radios to use towers that were at lower elevations which is impossible in the PNW since most infrastructure is on tall mountains.
Guess which option Customs used, neither of the above, they went back to manual selection of towers in a simulcast network, now this was done due to TDI issues in phase 1 and phase 2 TDI issues are even worse than those of phase 1.