CIS Tampa

Status
Not open for further replies.

TampaTyron

Beep Boop, Beep Boop
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
558
Location
Phoenix, AZ
They used to be on Telecom Network's LTR system and are now on Telecom Network's Linked Capacity Plus system across the I-4 corridor.
 

crash1

Member
Joined
May 2, 2003
Messages
38
Reaction score
2
Location
Tampa Area
Yeah that was a long time ago they're on that frequency I'm monitoring them right now
 

CanesFan95

Was Homeboys-Scanna
Banned
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
593
Location
FL
When CIS used to be on 462.3000, they stayed put on that 1 frequency but trunked around both slots. Now I've been noticing there's 2 Capacity Plus frequencies, but I can't find the other one for the life of me.
 

TampaTyron

Beep Boop, Beep Boop
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
558
Location
Phoenix, AZ
452.100 is what I have in my notes from a few months ago. Unsure if it changed since then. TT
 

CanesFan95

Was Homeboys-Scanna
Banned
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
593
Location
FL
452.1000 is the old AMR frequency that they abandoned. But if you lookup 452.1000 in the FCC database, it's also licensed to Allcom. Which is confusing, because how 2 different agencies get a license on the same frequency without interfering with each other?
 

CanesFan95

Was Homeboys-Scanna
Banned
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
593
Location
FL
And actually, there's a 3rd license for MOBILE-ONE Communications and Electronics, Inc. So they would triple-up and interfere with each other. Never understood why the FCC allows licenses for the same frequency in the same area like that. They're only gonna interfere. And why do radio companies do that in the first place? That seems completely dumb. It is always a mystery trying to understand how/why these radio companies get all their frequency licenses.
 

bravo14

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,458
Reaction score
672
Location
Polk County FL
And actually, there's a 3rd license for MOBILE-ONE Communications and Electronics, Inc. So they would triple-up and interfere with each other. Never understood why the FCC allows licenses for the same frequency in the same area like that. They're only gonna interfere. And why do radio companies do that in the first place? That seems completely dumb. It is always a mystery trying to understand how/why these radio companies get all their frequency licenses.

I never understood that either. In my area the school district has 2 same freqs 1 can be for a high school the other for middle. It's all DMR.
 

CanesFan95

Was Homeboys-Scanna
Banned
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
593
Location
FL
So I did some monitoring with DSD+ tonight and think I mighta figured this out. Critical Intervention Services (CIS) used to have several Capacity Plus sites that were only 1 RF frequency per site. Still trunking, but they would just trunk between slots 1 & 2. Now it appears each site is using 2 RF frequencies with 4 slots total for greater capacity. 452.1000 is dead, not a peep. 462.3000 *is* still active, but it's only 1 of 2 frequencies on its site. So a lot of the time, it'll seem like 462.3000 is inactive. You used to be able to listen to just 462.3000 and hear everything because this whole system used to only use 1 RF frequency per site. But now it's 2, so you gotta program in both frequencies like a Capacity Plus trunking system to make sure you hear everything.
 

CanesFan95

Was Homeboys-Scanna
Banned
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
593
Location
FL
Here's the LSNs that I've figured out with DSD+. I'll submit an update to the RR database shortly. There could be other sites, but these are the 3 that I can hear. All of these use Restricted Access to System (RAS), but fortunately no encryption. I haven't been able to find any site 1 frequencies.

SITE 2:
1/2 461.9250 CC1 Neighboring sites 1 5 6
3/4 453.0125 CC1 Neighboring sites 1 5 6

SITE 5:
1/2 462.3000 CC1 Neighboring sites 2 6
3/4 452.3375 CC1 Neighboring sites 2 6

SITE 6:
1/2 452.6125 CC1 Neighboring sites 2 5
3/4 464.4625 CC1 Neighboring sites 2 5

There used to be a frequency of 463.3125 which I can no longer hear anything on. The rest channel on site 5 doesn't seem to change much, so 452.3375 seems to have most of the activity.
 

CanesFan95

Was Homeboys-Scanna
Banned
Joined
Feb 14, 2008
Messages
3,377
Reaction score
593
Location
FL
For updating the database, it's gonna be confusing, cos right now there's 2 different systems. One in Pinellas County, which is just site 5: https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=8606 and the other in Hillsborough which has the wrong frequency info that needs updating: https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=8588 . And the FCC licensing is all screwy, so there's no way to nail down which repeater is where. Some frequencies are licensed multiple times in different locations. What a mess. Why are these radio companies always so confusing with how they do their FCC licenses? I can't seem to wrap my head around who "STULL, CHARLES C" is and why he has frequencies licensed on the same frequencies that Allcom, BCI, & BRODIE COMMUNICATIONS have licenses on.
 

TampaTyron

Beep Boop, Beep Boop
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
558
Location
Phoenix, AZ
The below is my perspective from when I worked in local radio shops around Tampa.......

Frequencies are a finite resource. There are only so many. In commercial radio systems, there are very few exclusive use frequencies (FB8 vs. FB2). Since there is a high likely hood that there will be other users on the frequency for my radio system, I license MANY frequencies in the hope that there will be enough clean channels at any one time to serve my customers. I often have to make "deals" with other shops for me to stay off one frequency if they stay off another (since we are often licensed on the same sets of frequencies). The frequency coordinators do not seem to care about minimizing interference. Often, there are many unlicensed users (Baofang/Wouxoun/etc), expired licenses, and people operating outside of their licenses on the same frequencies that my system is on. It is a constant battle to keep a system running for declining dollar revenue year-to-year. Now, with digital, it is much easier to design and deploy a multisite system that will automatically heal around interference, bad repeaters, network loss, etc.

I hope this helps, TT.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top