• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Complicated question about scanning between phase 1 and phase 2 systems

tgalveston

Newbie
Joined
Aug 5, 2022
Messages
3
I work for an agency that operates on a county simulcast system that is part of a statewide P25 trunked system. This particular county was the most recent to join the stateside system (within the past 2 years) and is the first to be PHASE 2 with the rest of the state currently PHASE 1 and planned to be PHASE 2 within the next several years.

Neighboring agencies (neighboring county) that operate PHASE 1 are programmed into our radios and we can communicate with them without issue. In doing so, the radio switches to that county’s simulcast cell when the radio is turned to that talkgroup. In my research, I have found that PHASE 2 interoperates with PHASE 1 by downgrading to PHASE 1. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

The issue arises here: We are unable to scan PHASE 1 talkgroups in our scan list. We can add them but they do not scan. The radios are programmed in a way where even if a PHASE 1 talkgroup is programmed in a zone full of PHASE 2 talkgroups, the radio switches to that TG’s home simulcast cell when you switch to that talkgroup.

We were told by some very uneducated people during initial training that if we were given the ability to scan that other counties TG’s that we would degrade the capacity of that system. On a side note, these are the same people who allowed the entire fleet of mobile radios in the largest cell of this decades old statewide system to go online with a programing error that kept every single mobile radio from having the ability to scan all together unless the microphone holder was grounded. Yes, they failed to allow for off hook scanning in CPS and now we await a promised WiFi OTA reprograming which I’m told is causing it’s own set of issues.

But I digress. I’m not an expert but this reasoning confuses me. The end used would only take up a slot on the phase 1 system if they keyed the radio, right? I referred to these individuals as uneducated, but they might very well be correct. And that’s my question. On a Motorola based P25 trunking system, can a Phase 2 radio scan Phase 1 TG’s without degrading that Phase 1 system? Thank you for your answers.
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,788
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
Without knowing particulars of your system, in Motorola networks, DDM (dual dynamic mode) is configurable by system managers to allow legacy radios (FDMA) to downgrade a talk group by affiliating on that talkgroup forcing all radios on that TG to operate in FDMA vs TDMA. With that being said, you may not be able to scan FDMA talkgroups if there aren't any FDMA subscriber affiliated on said groups. Again, depends on how the system is setup but DDM is a common option to allow older radios to access a network. This sounds like what you are experiencing.

The system I manage has most dispatch talkgroups set for DDM to allow mutual aid and the "stragglers" of legacy equipment to operate. Once they de-register, those talk groups revert to TDMA. We have set a date of 1/1/2026 for all legacy radios to be off the system at which time, we will change the TG type to TDMA only.
 

jeepsandradios

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
2,299
Location
East of the Mississippi
As said above without specifics on your system alot of what we can do is guess. In trunking some folks use site preference on talkgroups in radios, as well as in the system. A talkgroup can be "roamable" to use any cell in the system, but the codeplug could have a preference to alwasy use abc site and not roam to def site. This is all decided by the powers to be in a fleetmapping session. Depending on resources on your simulcast cell hey may not want FDMA talkgroups on it. If you have a 4-5 channel system that could tie up multiple voice paths and limit your resources. Scan jsut adds another level of confusion and programming. I have worked on systems similar to what you describe and when you are affiliated to your site unless a FDMA talkgroup is affiliated approved and on the air your radio wont hear it.
 

Motoballa

911 Dispatcher
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
439
Location
North Texas
Based on the users prior posts it appears they may be referring to Oakland County on MPSCS and while I know little about the system, just by scrolling through it looks like Oakland County is TDMA while most of the other system talkgroups if not all are still FDMA. MTS is correct when is comes to DDM but the OP mentioned it the other way around which doesn't entirely make sense unless we use jeeps response about the resources and site list assignment.
 
Top