I know we're getting off-topic here, but Duke Power reportedly is going to undergo a system-wide radio overhaul (atleast according to this thread).
Any rate increases to cover radio communications costs would involve atleast 5 state governements (N.C., S.C., OH, IN and Ky) ... and multiple hearings, since Duke Power is both an electric and a natural gas provider in several states.
Based on some Duke Energy printed communications, as well as utility-industry information I've read over the past couple of days, I don't think Duke Energy has any plans to switch to Open Sky for its fleet communications. They may be implementing VOiP dispatching, with the end-result of scalling back the number of communications centers throughout the five states, but that's not an earth-shattering change.
Here's a couple of links that will give you an idea of the vision Duke Energy leaders have of the company's future. Read the Motorola ezine quote at the bottom of these links, and consider the potential capabilities for both Duke and its customers. The quote all addresses funding this vision.
http://www.gridwiseac.org/pdfs/forum_papers/155_paper_final.pdf
Duke Energy Joins HomePlug® Powerline Alliance Board of Directors
Motorola eZine
"Leveraging the Intelligent Grid" (quote taken from the above material ... Duke Energy is also specifically touted for its initiative in the article)
" For most utilities, AMI networks are one of the most strategic initiatives they can undertake. Not only will they reap the significant rewards of automating the meter reading and data transmission system, they’ll be enabling a whole new set of benefits made possible by their wireless broadband networks.
" Says Energy Insights’ Nicholson, “For most utilities, building a high-speed wireless network on the back of their AMI systems is an investment that will provide value well beyond AMI. Once deployed, the organization will have real-time two-way communications with the bandwidth to support virtually everything they want to do.”
" In addition, regulators are typically favorably disposed to allowing utilities to recover the cost of capital investment in a wireless broadband network when it provides the utility with the ability to deliver additional connected utility solutions to their customers, and to improve the reliability and security of energy delivery throughout the electric grid. "