Viper43 said:
Seems odd that you being a member since 2002 you have a total of 12 posts and your claiming to suddenly have all this "valuable information".
Are you challenging my expertise based on the number of posts I've made to this board? Unfortunately I don't have a lot of time to actively participate (with kids and all...), but I do lurk quite a bit on the IN, MI, and OH forums because that is where I do a lot of my work professionally. (BTW, I am located in Ohio but I am a native Hoosier.) I pick up a lot of good tips on what's happening in the "real world" by reading these forums.
To give you an idea where I am coming from, I am a licensed professional engineer who has been employed in the telecom industry for 17 years, spending nearly the last 10 doing land mobile radio work. I have built LMR systems using Kenwood, Motorola and M/A-COM infrastructure. I have bought mobiles and portables from those vendors well as a couple others like Tait. I like to think I have a little experience in this area, but I can always learn more.
Viper43 said:
What I have seen in your posts is that read what you want to and then make your own conclusions, ignoring the rest of the information. Nothing you have written in this thread or the Hamilton Co thread has any proof of your points.
Huh? I have posted URLs backing up many of my statements in these two threads. I wouldn't have jumped in at all on the Hamilton County thread except for the fact the post I responded to was specifically wrong and I set the record straight with a URL to prove it! And if you need me to back up my points about ISSI and P25 interoperablity, I can dig up some links, but nothing I said in that post was particularly difficult to verify. Here are a couple links though:
M/A-COM / Motorola P25 Interop ->
http://www.hendonpub.com/resources/articlearchive/details.aspx?ID=758
Nice paper on ISSI and mobility between P25 networks ->
http://www.eads-ps.com/pdfs/ISSI WHITE PAPER - FINAL.pdf
My post in this thread that you responded to was a subjective observation I made that folks on this board (and the scanning community in general) tend to hold a significant pro-Motorola bias. It came after I had just read about the snake oil M/A-COM sells... Why doesn't anyone ever talk about the snake oil Motorola sells? (like maybe Harmony...) The point of my post was to get people to realize that Motorola does screw up once in a while and that perhaps they should look past their biases. I specifically took the opportunity of the Duke Harmony system to show on this board that both vendors have issues. In my experience, success is mainly determined by not the vendor, but by customer participation, either by having the proper internal resources or unbiased third-party consultants manage the project.
Viper43 said:
And if you really did read these threads completly you'd know that your incorrect. You also wouldn't have used the SAFET issue in Hancock Co or taxpayer comment either because if you really knew what you were talking about you'd know the Motorola has to fix issues like Hancock Co. has at THIER expense, not the taxpayers expense as part of their contract with the state.
Again, my comment was not about the reality of the situation but how it's perceived by this community. In that thread you pointed out that Motorola is on the hook at least to some degree to fix the situation. That may very well be true. However, the thread as a whole does not cast Motorola in a particularly unfavorable light. The second post infers that problem was simply that not enough taxpayer money was thrown at the problem or, worse yet, it cynically recognizes that Motorola messed up but we should accept it and have the taxpayers cough up more money. Where's the outrage with Motorola? Maybe I missed it. Seems to me that if this were a M/A-COM system that had the very same results, the board would be filled with a lot louder disdain for SAFE-T. Yes, that's my opinion and your welcome to not share it. But rather than disagree with me, you went for an ad hominem attack. Nice...
--z
P.S. Sorry for being OT folks, but I just couldn't let this go....