Encryption

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Messages
6,415
Reaction score
3,866
Location
CT
monitored by any scanner devices?
No radio can monitor encrypted Encrypted transmissions, unless they are affiliated with the system AND have the key.

No scanner can do this.

On Uniden scanners, you will either hear garbage audio and/or see "ENC" on the display.
 

donc13

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,105
Location
Grand Junction, CO
It's illegal to decrypt encrypted transmissions unless you are an authorized user using an authorized radio.

Period
 

freqseeker

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2003
Messages
480
Reaction score
478
Location
Puget Sound WA.
The purpose of encryption is to keep anyone except those authorized from listening. It is like a lock on your door, meant to keep people out.
 

natedawg1604

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 29, 2013
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
583
Location
Colorado
It's illegal to decrypt encrypted transmissions unless you are an authorized user using an authorized radio.

Period
Isn't this a meaningless point? I keep seeing people mentioning this, which implies it is somehow possible to accomplish. I guess I do recall some vague posts quite a while ago about people claiming someone, somewhere allegedly figured out a way to "hack around" AES (exploiting something about how AES is implemented, obviously not cracking AES itself).

But IMO the legality of this is irrelevant, so far no one has provided evidence it's actually been done. From what I've heard, cartels have been known to monitor Federal agency radios by literally bribing someone in the agency.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,472
Reaction score
36,359
Location
United States
Isn't this a meaningless point? I keep seeing people mentioning this, which implies it is somehow possible to accomplish.

Technology moves faster than the government. It's just a way of making it against the rules separate from the technological aspect.

There are also rules regarding 'eavesdropping'.
 

Giddyuptd

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
477
Location
Here and there
Isn't this a meaningless point? I keep seeing people mentioning this, which implies it is somehow possible to accomplish. I guess I do recall some vague posts quite a while ago about people claiming someone, somewhere allegedly figured out a way to "hack around" AES (exploiting something about how AES is implemented, obviously not cracking AES itself).

But IMO the legality of this is irrelevant, so far no one has provided evidence it's actually been done. From what I've heard, cartels have been known to monitor Federal agency radios by literally bribing someone in the agency.

If it does exist, 3 letter ends, foreign such as Russian or Chinese intelligence maybe if it did. But being a current standard for AES end highly unlikely on a modern scale for majority.

As for lower end adp or 16 bit etc types that is why they are not a authorized standard for grant monies. Weak have been broken in test labs.

DES still.sstill.in most factors minus higher end that could do it possibly.

all in all unication does make a exception capable rx but you must have the authorized key, and so on.

Last I checked they wanted it verified who you're with to even get the enc option enabled. Could have changed.

In end AES hasn't been proven to be broke and why its a standard.

In end unless you're a spy for China, Russia or cia type intelligence the costs and ability aside from legal aspect would be beyond anyone's means or capacity.
 

donc13

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,105
Location
Grand Junction, CO
Isn't this a meaningless point? I keep seeing people mentioning this, which implies it is somehow possible to accomplish. I guess I do recall some vague posts quite a while ago about people claiming someone, somewhere allegedly figured out a way to "hack around" AES (exploiting something about how AES is implemented, obviously not cracking AES itself).

But IMO the legality of this is irrelevant, so far no one has provided evidence it's actually been done. From what I've heard, cartels have been known to monitor Federal agency radios by literally bribing someone in the agency.
The FCC rule applies to any encrypted signal. New encrypted systems since 2014 must use AES but older systems don't and in many cases could be easily broken.
 

donc13

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,547
Reaction score
1,105
Location
Grand Junction, CO
You would be quite wrong.
Obviously, if you are just receiving only, no affiliation to the system is required (or possible) but you must have the key.

Or maybe a bank of quantum computers or supercomputers trying to find the key.
 

GTR8000

NY/NJ Database Guy
Database Admin
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
17,019
Reaction score
16,463
Location
BEE00
Perhaps you missed the bold font I used to emphasis the "unless they are affiliated" part. No affiliation necessary, otherwise Multi-System Scan and Intelligent Priority scan lists would not function correctly.
 

K7MFC

WRAA720
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Messages
882
Reaction score
895
Location
Phx, AZ
Isn't this a meaningless point? I keep seeing people mentioning this, which implies it is somehow possible to accomplish.

Does decrypting encrypted communications necessarily mean breaking the encryption algorithm? If one uses a stolen or otherwise unauthorized radio, you're still decrypting comms that aren't intended for you.
 

WX4JCW

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,502
Reaction score
1,028
Location
Stow, Ohio
Regardless of wether in theory it could be broken, it is a Federal Felony, look at the morons in stark county oh, would you really want to be the one they go after to set an example and prove a point, that is IF you could get a key.
 

ur20v

The Feds say my name hot like when the oven on
Joined
May 8, 2015
Messages
751
Reaction score
324
Location
NOVA
One would need NSA computer power to decrypt AES 256, you definitely will not decrypy anythong on the fly while listening.
AES Encryption | Everything you need to know about AES

Despite what some shortwave radio talk show hosts and Hollywood would have you believe, even the NSA doesn't possess the kind of computer power necessary to break AES 256 encryption or similar. The feds break encryption the same way everyone else does - by stealing or otherwise obtaining the key one way or another.

Regardless of wether in theory it could be broken, it is a Federal Felony, look at the morons in stark county oh, would you really want to be the one they go after to set an example and prove a point, that is IF you could get a key.

Who exactly are these morons you speak of? Ohio is chock full of 'em; you need to be more specific.
 

majoco

Stirrer
Joined
Dec 25, 2008
Messages
4,315
Reaction score
998
Location
New Zealand
Going right back to the WW2 "Enigma" system with rolling codes and sometimes ten phases of coding that was eventually broken but still needed a good deal of 'sleuthing' - and by mistakes made by the sender sometimes by having the encrypted message followed a bit later by the plain language text or the same message coded twice - the concept is that even though the message may eventually be read, the information contained is so far out of date as to be useless.

Oops - that's all one sentence - take a deep breath....

I believe the WW2 "Enigma" was eventually broken by the German habit of opening every message with "Heil Hitler".
 

WX4JCW

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,502
Reaction score
1,028
Location
Stow, Ohio
Despite what some shortwave radio talk show hosts and Hollywood would have you believe, even the NSA doesn't possess the kind of computer power necessary to break AES 256 encryption or similar. The feds break encryption the same way everyone else does - by stealing or otherwise obtaining the key one way or another.



Who exactly are these morons you speak of? Ohio is chock full of 'em; you need to be more specific.
alas, I can not do your research for you, 99% of the subscribers here most likely got my reference, the case was well known
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top