FCC proposes deleting cellular frequency block rule

letarotor

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,058
Reaction score
237
Location
Arlington, TX
I've wondered why they haven't done this many years ago Tom. I've got a number of old radios that can receive this band or the frequencies used in the 1990s through early 2000s. Once in a great while I'll scan through just to see if there's anything there and I'm not getting any kind of signals. I understand there are some kinds of data signals occasionally there but I don't seem to ever hear those. It's just a bunch of unused space between 869 MHz and 894 MHz as well as the 45 MHz lower input frequencies for that old cellular band. I'm surprised they haven't turned it over to public safety users in past years. Thanks for the link.

COMMSCAN
 

nd5y

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
12,336
Reaction score
4,581
Location
Wichita Falls, TX
I've wondered why they haven't done this many years ago Tom. I've got a number of old radios that can receive this band or the frequencies used in the 1990s through early 2000s. Once in a great while I'll scan through just to see if there's anything there and I'm not getting any kind of signals. I understand there are some kinds of data signals occasionally there but I don't seem to ever hear those. It's just a bunch of unused space between 869 MHz and 894 MHz as well as the 45 MHz lower input frequencies for that old cellular band. I'm surprised they haven't turned it over to public safety users in past years. Thanks for the link.

COMMSCAN
You won't hear anything on a scanner. An SDR or something with a spectrum display will show 869-894 is full of wideband (5-20 MHz wide) signals.
 

nd5y

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
12,336
Reaction score
4,581
Location
Wichita Falls, TX
Even if the FCC approves the 15.121 rule deletion there likely won't be any scanners that cover the cellular bands any time soon. Depending on the hardware and firmware changes involved it could require the products to be re-certified. The manufacturers would probably not do that for existing models.

Be careful what you wish for. It could even be a curse. Future models could be made with crappier wideband receivers without the cellular ranges blocked and make intereference from nearby cell sites worse.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,530
Reaction score
33,500
Location
United States
It's just a bunch of unused space between 869 MHz and 894 MHz as well as the 45 MHz lower input frequencies for that old cellular band. I'm surprised they haven't turned it over to public safety users in past years. Thanks for the link.

No, that's all still used by the cellular carriers. They are not going to give that up. Way too valuable for the cell carriers.

Your scanner just can't demodulate anything there, other than noise.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,530
Reaction score
33,500
Location
United States
Even if the FCC approves the 15.121 rule deletion there likely won't be any scanners that cover the cellular bands any time soon. Depending on the hardware and firmware changes involved it could require the products to be re-certified. The manufacturers would probably not do that for existing models.

Right. Spectrum analyzers, SDR's, unblocked receivers will receive there and are perfectly legal.
There's just nothing to listen to in that range, other than very wide band data streams.

There's no analog, P25, DMR, NXDN, LTR, etc. in those bands, and no one is missing anything, other than if you just want to hear wideband data blasting out of the speaker.
 

GlobalNorth

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 2, 2020
Messages
2,616
Reaction score
2,789
Location
Fort Misery
You won't hear anything on a scanner. An SDR or something with a spectrum display will show 869-894 is full of wideband (5-20 MHz wide) signals.

Back in the day, my Yaesu FRG-9600 pulled in the analog signals and I listened in. Now, no more.
 

PACNWDude

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
1,525
Reaction score
758
I miss the days of listening to analog cell phones......it was why I bought a Pro-2006 scanner and immediately cut the diode. Great entertainment/intel gathering. Then, at work it was service monitors that were put to task. Back then, it was IFR Marconi test sets.......which was great listening as well. Just a lot more expensive for that hardware.

The FCC is way too slow at many things, including this. (Coming from someone who paid $70 for my GMRS license, even when they agreed to lower it to $35, then took over a year to actually do so).
 
Top