I wish you luck. Based on what early adopters are saying, the radio has some rough edges that Yaesu is still smoothing out. New firmware dropped last Friday. https://www.yaesu.com/Files/BB2B47A...FTX-1 Firmware Update Information 6-27-25.pdfI just picked one up.
The FTX-1 Field is the same price as the 705 and a much better radio.Pricing is at $1,899?
Too pricey for many in the hobby.
This was never supposed to be a satellite radio. TP already have a separation kit. Yaesu has produced a game changer radio and continues to be the best in Ham radio. You should not listen to the trolls.Not full duplex which satellite enthusiasts want.
Amp can't be operated separate from the main unit. IOW, in a mobile installation, you can't mount the main unit near the driver with the amp in the trunk or under the seat.
Both are "swing and a miss" on the part of Yaesu.
Hi Bob, and thanks for the intelligent reply.Good job quoting something I said 3 months ago soon after the radio was released. A lot has been learned since then.
As someone who once said "I have a Xiegu X6100, it rocks!" and is now "so happy with my FTX-1 Field", I guess things change with you, too.
And, you may have missed my post later that day where I said that I didn't think the radio would fail. There's definitely a market for a portable HF radio and the docking feature with the amp is unique. But, I have no interest in a low-powered portable HF radio, so I will gladly hesitate to buy one.
Are you using the radio for anything but portable ops on HF? Did you use it on Field Day? Do you use it as a mobile radio with the amp? Do you use it as a base radio with the amp? Do you use it with fldigi or WSJT-X? Do you use it with any rig control software? Do you use APRS? Do you use WIRES-X?
By what measure?It is very close to my FT-710 in performance.
Ranking | Sensitivity (μV) | Dynamic Range Narrow Spaced (dB) | |
---|---|---|---|
Yaesu FTdx-101D/MP | 1st | 0.60 (no preamp) 0.20 (preamp 1) 0.12 (preamp 2) | 110 |
Yaesu FTdx-10 | 2nd | 0.63 (no preamp) 0.21 (preamp 1) 0.15 (preamp 2) | 107 |
Yaesu FT-710 | 3rd | 0.66 (no preamp) 0.23 (preamp 1) 0.13 (preamp 2) | 107 |
Icom IC-R8600 | 4th | 0.40 (no preamp) 0.12 (preamp 1) | 107 |
Elecraft K3S | 5th | 0.27 (no preamp) 0.20 (preamp 1) | 106 |
Yaesu FTX-1 Optima | 34th | 0.90 (no preamp) 0.25 (preamp 1) | 91 |
Icom IC-705 | 38th | 0.67 (no preamp) 0.20 (preamp 1) | 88 |
When I did my comparison I was on an A/B switch with the FTX on one side and the FT-710 on the other with the same antenna. I picked a crowded signal and listened to both. This is not Rob's Lab but an honest test. The 710 was better, but the FTX was holding it's own. I do think that it is still important in a portable situation as you are always fighting the kilowatt stations that pretend they don't hear you. The FTX brings true desktop performance, because it is the desktop without the 100 watt amp and auto tuner.By what measure?
Let me preface the rest of my post by saying that there are many ways to measure performance. Receive sensitivity is one such measurement. As is, dynamic range (the ability to detect small signals in close proximity with large signals).
This is from Rob Sherwood NC0B receiver test data:
Ranking Sensitivity (μV) Dynamic Range Narrow Spaced (dB) Yaesu FTdx-101D/MP 1st 0.60 (no preamp)
0.20 (preamp 1)
0.12 (preamp 2)110 Yaesu FTdx-10 2nd 0.63 (no preamp)
0.21 (preamp 1)
0.15 (preamp 2)107 Yaesu FT-710 3rd 0.66 (no preamp)
0.23 (preamp 1)
0.13 (preamp 2)107 Icom IC-R8600 4th 0.40 (no preamp)
0.12 (preamp 1)107 Elecraft K3S 5th 0.27 (no preamp)
0.20 (preamp 1)106 Yaesu FTX-1 Optima 34th 0.90 (no preamp)
0.25 (preamp 1)91 Icom IC-705 38th 0.67 (no preamp)
0.20 (preamp 1)88
I will say it again, there are many ways to measure performance. And, in some situations, how a radio suits your operating style is much, much more important than raw performance based on just one or two parameters. I can appreciate that portable ops put more emphasis on light weight and low power consumption. But, if the two offerings from the Japanese "Big 3" are any indication, receive sensitivity doesn't seem to be a design priority for HF portable radios. And, maybe that's the correct approach. The market will tell us if it is.