• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Glass mount vhf antenna?

Status
Not open for further replies.

dixie729

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
429
Location
Daviess Co., KY
My brother has a new ford explorer. Im putting a Motorola CDM 750 vhf in it. He doesn't want to drill a hole in the roof, nor does he want to use a magnetic mount. I've found a glass mount vhf antenna with a mini uhf male connection that I need. My question is... has anybody used these glass mounts for vhf radios? Are they even worth the money? How good does it RX and TX?
 

kayn1n32008

ØÆSØ Say it, say 'ENCRYPTION'
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
7,257
Location
Sector 001
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (BlackBerry; U; BlackBerry 9780; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.8+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0.0.600 Mobile Safari/534.8+)

If no hole in roof, or a mag mount go with an 'L' bracket between the fender and the hood.
 

stagnuts

Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2010
Messages
64
Location
Rome, NY
I have the glass mount on my car and have also put them on 3 of my 5 fire trucks. They work great. Great reception by Rx and Tx. Never had any complaints by either our member's or Fire control. So yes I would highly recommend them.
 

Skypilot007

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
2,584
Location
Medford, NJ
Glass mounts are a slight compromise in performance but they do work. Every radio system is different and results will vary. You won't really know how good or bad it is until you try it out. Good luck.
 

radionerd13669

Useless Contributor
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Messages
373
Location
Northern,New York
I have good success with glass mounts. I have found it also depends a lot on the brand. I have personally never used one but I have had no complaints from the ones that do
 

n8zcc

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
204
Location
Oakland, Michigan
Glass mounts are a slight compromise in performance but they do work. Every radio system is different and results will vary. You won't really know how good or bad it is until you try it out. Good luck.

I don't think I can agree that glass mounted antennas offer a compromise in performance. The biggest problem is the glass followed by the location on the glass the antenna is mounted. This is what introduces compromise, not the antenna.

Through glass antennas are designed to take advantage of the capacitance of the glass during the design thus offering a matched coupling.

If the glass has metallic particles in it like some of the solar tint glass does this isn't going to work well. Also, mounting the antenna too low affects the radiation.

OP, search for how to identify metallic solar glass and check with the vehicle's manufacture.

Larson, in my opinion, makes the best.
Public Safety Antennas - Larsen Pulse
 

jim202

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2002
Messages
2,736
Location
New Orleans region
No matter how you look at it, glass mounts are a compromise. A VHF glass mount is not a very good choice. the largest reason is the coupling ability. Having a good relation with a number of the engineers at several of the antenna companies, they all say the same thing. It is very hard to get a good coupling through the glass at the VHF frequencies. This also causes an issue with the SWR.

Do as you think best.
 

RodStrong

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
1,180
Location
West
Do as you wish, but I would go with an L bracket hood mount. I have had one on my personal rig for years, and it works great. Much better than an on-glass antenna IMO. Good luck either way.
 

K9DAK

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
697
Location
Wauconda, IL
I had a Larson KG-2/70 mounted low on the rear window (straddling the lowest defroster wire) on my old VW Golf and it worked great . . . worked a lot of VHF simplex with it. Then I moved it to my new VW Beetle in the same location and it may as well have been a wet noodle. Turns out the Beetle has a high metallic content in the glass.

So as the others have said, it may or may not work for you depending on location, type of glass, etc.
 

popnokick

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 21, 2004
Messages
2,916
Location
Northeast PA
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9B176 Safari/7534.48.3)

Metallic content of the window glass explains why there are such widely varied good/bad reports for on-glass antennas... even within this thread. So are there any standard markings on the glass or other method to determine metal content of auto glass? And I guess that question is for someone in the auto glass field.
 

wa2chj

Member
Joined
May 4, 2006
Messages
196
Location
Charlotte, NC Metro
I also have had mixed results with glass mount. The biggest problem I've had is the usually very narrow bandwidth of the glass mount antennas.
 

W2NJS

Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
1,938
Location
Washington DC
Radio frequency energy is an AC signal.
The glass acts as a capacitor.
Capacitors block DC and pass AC.
The on-glass antenna is designed to handle the capacitance introduced by the glass.
The antenna is furnished with a tuning network which must be set using a good wattmeter for VSWR.
Beyond that point you must have non-metallic glass, ideally, for the antenna to work properly.
Once you know what you're working with you can usually get an on-glass antenna to work fine.
The L-bracket also works fine, but it places the antenna relatively low and the RF may get into the vehicle's electronics when transmitting with the engine running.
 

dixie729

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
429
Location
Daviess Co., KY
Sounds like Im gunna have to put my engineering skills to work and fabricate a bracket to maybe mount under the lugage rack or off the back hach of the explorer.
 

cmdrwill

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
3,984
Location
So Cali
Just make sure that the antenna mount is grounded to the vehicle's body, the ground IS one half of the antenna... Ground plane...
 

K9DAK

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
697
Location
Wauconda, IL

Attachments

  • DSC_0673_01.JPG
    DSC_0673_01.JPG
    84.8 KB · Views: 5,584

dixie729

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 12, 2008
Messages
429
Location
Daviess Co., KY
Thanks K9DAK. I looked into one of those. The problem I ran into was the piece above the tail light on the rear hatch is plastic on the outside, Im not sure if the inside part is also plastic I'd have to look. the plastic piece runs from the tail light all the way to the roof. It's going to be mounted on a 2008 Ford Explorer.
 
Last edited:

n8zcc

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
204
Location
Oakland, Michigan
No matter how you look at it, glass mounts are a compromise. A VHF glass mount is not a very good choice. the largest reason is the coupling ability. Having a good relation with a number of the engineers at several of the antenna companies, they all say the same thing. It is very hard to get a good coupling through the glass at the VHF frequencies. This also causes an issue with the SWR.

Do as you think best.

The engineers you have a good relationship with at several antenna companies must be the sanitation engineers. A competent RF engineer never would have said that.

You should not propagate false information, it only servers to confuse those who are learning and researching.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top