• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

GROL License

AM909

Radio/computer geek
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
1,755
Reaction score
764
Location
SoCal
There was one where an answer was a bad Evinrude circuit.

I hear people say 'a minus 3 dB loss', I don't know how they can lose negative 3 dB.
The same folks that justify "irregardless" as a more emphatic term than "regardless". ;)
 

bot

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2024
Messages
6
Reaction score
12
Considering putting together a list of videos for the exams. I found some more videos just haven't had a chance to review them all yet. May list them in their own thread. Should make it easier to find and so others can add links to resources on it.
 

bot

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2024
Messages
6
Reaction score
12
Or how bout someone stating antenna gain in dBm? That drives me nuts.
This is the first time I've heard this. And just saw it in one of the videos I am reviewing. The narrator states that it is "decibels relative to one milliwatt. "
 

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,553
Reaction score
837
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
This is the first time I've heard this. And just saw it in one of the videos I am reviewing. The narrator states that it is "decibels relative to one milliwatt. "

For the folks who do not know the difference and are wondering what the big deal in this splintered section of the thread is:

That is, indeed, the definition of dBm (dBm = decibels refenced to one milliwatt). But, antenna gains, or gains in general, are not expressed in dBm, rather more typically dBi (referenced to isotropic radiator) or dBd (referenced to dipole). A number in dBm is a specific power level, while dBi or dBd are gain ratios based on specific references. dB alone is a ratio with no specific reference.

You can reference anything in dB. For example, 0 dBhuman would be one person, while 6 dBhuman would be 4 people. Would you rather have $20, or 20 dB$?

Related note, I get a tad perturbed when I see someone insist that their antenna is something like "4.5 DB's" and so it must be better than the other guys antenna that is 4.3 dBd, but having no idea if his antenna gain is rated in dBi or dBd, or the fact those different standards exist. Never mind that in the real world that 0.2 dB may not be present at all (depending on so many variables), or that without knowing the stated refence (i or d) you cannot know the relationships of the two antenna gains.

Oh, and and the other part of my peeve above, plural dB is dB, not dB's ;-) And the d is always lower case (SI prefix deci = small d) and the B is always capital (a persons name, Bell).

So many things wrapped up in such a such a little letter count.

T!
 

dickie757

Wired
Joined
Apr 25, 2017
Messages
662
Reaction score
317
Location
Out of range
This is the first time I've heard this. And just saw it in one of the videos I am reviewing. The narrator states that it is "decibels relative to one milliwatt. "
Good, now let's see if you learned anything....how much power is 0 dBm?
 

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,553
Reaction score
837
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
Good, now let's see if you learned anything....how much power is 0 dBm?

The part that often messes with new people to the concept is negatives in this application. How much power is -6 dBm?

The fact that -6 dBm is still a positive number can mess with folks that did not get the basics of, anything in dB is always a ratio.

T!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bot
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,943
Reaction score
961
Location
Pittsboro IN
I don't see dBc, decibels below carrier, in 2 way much, more used in the cell world.
These are from Tom Dover's GCT books.
 

Attachments

  • new dbi copyright.jpg
    new dbi copyright.jpg
    43.3 KB · Views: 7
  • dBm v dBc.jpg
    dBm v dBc.jpg
    56.3 KB · Views: 7
  • Like
Reactions: bot

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,584
Reaction score
14,708
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Antenna manufacturers love to rate things in dBi since it gives them an extra 2.15 dB to add to their numbers compared to ones who use dBd.
dBc is very common in the satellite/satcom industry and dBi is a legitimate reference and used throughout the satellite industry and even some FCC test specs are referenced to dBi. The problem is when antenna mfrs toss out a dB gain with no reference to anything.
 
Top