• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Heat sink compound

Status
Not open for further replies.

CyberWarrior

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Location
Ft Lauderdale FL
I would like to know,if I can use Artic Silver heatsink grease for the transistors that now are using white grease from the factory.



Freddy
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
18,256
Reaction score
14,239
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Are you changing transistors or just thinking about changing the compound on an existing transistor? If its the second reason don't bother, you are more likely to screw something up for no benefit.

You might want to watch a Youtube video on using heatsink compound, you use as little as possible because the compound will never be as good as a bare metal to metal contact for heat transfer. Its only there to fill in any voids from poorly made heatsink surfaces, bent parts, etc.
prcguy
prcguy
 

HelixArray

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Location
TN
There's "better" TIM out there nowadays.. but that's for extreme users IMO. Chances are your IS5 is better than the factories white...used to polish my CPUs with wet sand paper to get a mirror finish. Nowadays you can clock some CPUs to 5Ghz on air! I would stay away from the permanent stuff. I glued some heatsinks to some MOSFETs with an AS5 brand before and it was worse than the factory
 

cmdrwill

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
3,979
Reaction score
376
Location
So Cali
I have been use Artic Silver heatsink compound for many years, it works....
 

HelixArray

Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2007
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Location
TN
As far as I can remember(I've been out that OC game for a while), the difference between the two should be minute. Some do better at sub zero temps, some at idle etc.; it's all tailored to those type of extremes IMHO. While the conductivity differs between the two, ceramique being the safer for bleed-over on leads. I never really was able to get a decent spread of AS5 under my sinks. I used the recommended size for the surface area(half a grain of rice and tinting). But like prcguy said, a dabb will do you..and you already know how large a CPU is.

That said, more airflow has always been the route I've taken
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top