KB2GOM
Active Member
Oh really? How do you propose I camouflage this???
Its an old picture and the tower is much busier now.
View attachment 94112
Would I be right in presuming that is not a private installation?
Oh really? How do you propose I camouflage this???
Its an old picture and the tower is much busier now.
View attachment 94112
1. What equipment, if any, would you add to this setup?
Would I be right in presuming that is not a private installation?
Well, if crazy preppers don't get you, you better hope that the price of aluminum doesn't rise. Recyclers will strip you clean.
Although in checking the repeater directory (granted this is NOT an official FCC document) it's been recommended that the calling frequencies be monitored for five minutes on top of the hour especially in areas with little or no repeater activity for possible emergency traffic. Granted it's not the same as an actual, definite emergency frequency although (at least to me) it sounds like a reasonable recommendation.
Yeah, it would stink to have a real problem at 6 minutes after the hour.It's a good idea in theory. So was the Long Interval Tone Zero (LITZ) movement that sort of rattled around for a bit.
But simplex range is short. Especially with mag mount antennas, hand held radios, etc.
Having to wait until the top of the hour to have your emergency might be a bit inconvenient, too.
It would be pretty nice if more people monitored 146.52, but I've found it to not be the case.
Yeah, it would stink to have a real problem at 6 minutes after the hour.
Have shovel will dig do not worry I WILL BURY YOU BEFORE YOU STINK UP THE AREA.Well, if crazy preppers don't get you, you better hope that the price of aluminum doesn't rise. Recyclers will strip you clean.
It would be pretty nice if more people monitored 146.52, but I've found it to not be the case.
Well for his BC125AT if he uses Scan125 Control Program then this has fully automated recording functions built in. Downside is it adds a laptop/pc to the setup but I suspect that will already be there for other purposes.I would add some sort of digital recorder to the system. As many channels as possible.
It's a good idea in theory.
Having to wait until the top of the hour to have your emergency might be a bit inconvenient, too. I'm sure a frequency can be used for emergencies regardless of what time it is. It's just that at the top of the hour (if I understand it correctly) people need to make the effort to pause their jibber-jabber and actively listen (or to quote our fourth grade match teacher, "shut up and pay attention" ); and this whole thing is recommended primarily for areas with few to no repeaters.
It would be pretty nice if more people monitored 146.52, but I've found it to not be the case. Depends on your area, I suppose. Here in the northern 'burbs of Chicago it's not only used but so active that a lot of activity spills over to other simplex frequencies as well (like 146.550).
I'm sure a frequency can be used for emergencies regardless of what time it is.
Depends on your area, I suppose. Here in the northern 'burbs of Chicago it's not only used but so active that a lot of activity spills over to other simplex frequencies as well (like 146.550).
Are you sharing?I have a list of my "go to" frequencies for any emergencies, a lot of these are not ones that you would expect.
Are you sharing?
Interesting.As I am on the other side of the world, not much use to you guys but here are a few:
- Bus companies
- Store staff / security
- UHF CB
- Data signals
Yes you should. We don't get to see antenna farms very often.I need to take an updated picture.