• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

IWCE 2019

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
2,032
Reaction score
1,020
Location
Pittsboro IN
Yes, we need to make a plan before hand. I looked at the BK radio, stopped in to get a central Indiana contact.

Our county has a Motorola only policy which I'm in the process of getting changed. We use the state's P25 system, they allow M, K, BK and H now. Our FD was offered 12 Kenwoods for free from a local business but had to turn them down and spend $52k for batwings on the belt.

The 11' tall BK tech chief was rolling his eyes when another dealer was describing the county next to him using UHF DMR.
The nerve! He'd crap his drawers if he knew public safety agencies in Texas are using DMR.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
28,623
Reaction score
36,897
Location
United States
Thanks for the review, any idea on price?
It'll be a few months until I can buy one anyway.

I don't recall, so much info over the last few days it all sort of gets lost. I think you'd be looking at something in the $3,500 and up range, but don't hold me to that. Maybe Speedway remembers.
 

DanRollman

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
1,272
Reaction score
603
Location
Atlanta, GA
I'm mainly wondering if it's backwards compatible with the DPH, KNG, and KNG2, how easy is it to clone both to and from, and of course, price. I've been holding out for this radio and wondering how much my bank account is going to hurt.

I confirmed with the BK engineer that the 9000 will use RES for programming and is compatible with KNG and KNG2 files (just as compatible as KNG-P and KNG-M - switch radio model, set the different button/switch selections, and write).

Not surprising, but he also confirmed the 9000 retains the RX Only feature that is one of the things the KNG and KNG2 offer that APX doesn't, for easy 'true trunking' monitoring (not 'no affiliate scan') of neighboring systems by select radios without needing a key. That, obviously, was how that demo 9000 was scanning SNACC P25 to demonstrate audio quality.
 

Onelick

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2018
Messages
71
Reaction score
35
Location
100 yards west of the east branch of the Antietam
I don't recall, so much info over the last few days it all sort of gets lost. I think you'd be looking at something in the $3,500 and up range, but don't hold me to that. Maybe Speedway remembers.
I confirmed with the BK engineer that the 9000 will use RES for programming and is compatible with KNG and KNG2 files (just as compatible as KNG-P and KNG-M - switch radio model, set the different button/switch selections, and write).

Not surprising, but he also confirmed the 9000 retains the RX Only feature that is one of the things the KNG and KNG2 offer that APX doesn't, for easy 'true trunking' monitoring (not 'no affiliate scan') of neighboring systems by select radios without needing a key. That, obviously, was how that demo 9000 was scanning SNACC P25 to demonstrate audio quality.

Thanks for the info. Ballpark $3500 is still a whole lot cheaper than $6000 for an apx.
But, now that I think about it, I'll still have to carry two radios to test the NIFC repeaters when I set them up on an incident.

Thanks,
Onelick
 

mancow

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Feb 19, 2003
Messages
6,943
Reaction score
1,136
Location
N.E. Kansas
I confirmed with the BK engineer that the 9000 will use RES for programming and is compatible with KNG and KNG2 files (just as compatible as KNG-P and KNG-M - switch radio model, set the different button/switch selections, and write).

Not surprising, but he also confirmed the 9000 retains the RX Only feature that is one of the things the KNG and KNG2 offer that APX doesn't, for easy 'true trunking' monitoring (not 'no affiliate scan') of neighboring systems by select radios without needing a key. That, obviously, was how that demo 9000 was scanning SNACC P25 to demonstrate audio quality.
I want one!
 

Project25_MASTR

TX-COMU
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
4,806
Reaction score
1,377
Location
Texas
Yes, we need to make a plan before hand. I looked at the BK radio, stopped in to get a central Indiana contact.

Our county has a Motorola only policy which I'm in the process of getting changed. We use the state's P25 system, they allow M, K, BK and H now. Our FD was offered 12 Kenwoods for free from a local business but had to turn them down and spend $52k for batwings on the belt.

The 11' tall BK tech chief was rolling his eyes when another dealer was describing the county next to him using UHF DMR.
The nerve! He'd crap his drawers if he knew public safety agencies in Texas are using DMR.

Dallas fire training ground comes to mind.

I’m not against public safety using DMR but they have to have competent operating procedures in place for interoperability with neighboring agencies (dispatchers have to know how to create patches, incident command declares a tactical channel accessible to everyone on scene, etc). Of course, a lot of that is the job of the emergency management coordinator and the ball gets dropped often in many areas.

That being said, P25 is getting cheaper and more affordable if you are willing to venture out of the traditional Motorola/JKUSA/Harris-Tait vendor list. Example, I can now build a Phase 2 ready multi-site system using RF Technology Eclipse 3 and their trunking controller (which is a true DVSI base) for the same price as what my Connect Plus system cost to build. GME ROM’d me $1200 (at cost) for trunking mobiles with AES256 (Phase 1 only) and Icom’s new line was in a similar price range (and can be upgraded to Phase 2). There are options out there, you just need to price shop and look (hire a vender neutral consultant).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
2,032
Reaction score
1,020
Location
Pittsboro IN
I did not ask about prices since the state has a QPA (IPSC: Approved Vendor/Equipment List).
I'm the small town rep on the county communications advisory board, I want to make sure the chiefs have all the info they need to make the best purchase decision for their department.

I missed the RF Technology booth. 2 years ago I talked to them about voice paging xmtrs, they were 'coming out soon' with one but the project fell through so I didn't follow up. If their definition of 'coming soon' is like Hytera's it might still be on the drawing board.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top