log your SW catches here:)

Status
Not open for further replies.

cgearhar

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Location
South Windsor, CT
A typo on that freq or an image? best regards..Mike

No typo...was listed in both NASWA's spreadsheet (downloaded this evening) and MT's listing. It threw me at first too...even though it was listed in MT I didn't see it in NASWA's spreadsheet. But then I downloaded the latest and there it was.
 

woebbers

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
Location
Lewes Delaware
11780 KHZ at 01:17

I Was doing a little listening tonite and came upon Radio Australia out of Kranji S7 signal and fading in and out...I havent had much luck from down under these days. I had to dig it out because of Radio Martion on 11775 banging in here on the east coast.

Sal
 

midnightcowboy

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
5.890 mhz...mentioned as v2a or m8a, cuban spy station in spynumbers.com..Confirmed them so many times in my own shortwave..It is indeed cuban spy station..Luv the soap opera too featuring Fidel, Raul, and Alina (Fidel's illegitimate..) plus the music...LOL
 

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,491
Reaction score
734
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
5.890 mhz...mentioned as v2a or m8a, cuban spy station in spynumbers.com..Confirmed them so many times in my own shortwave..It is indeed cuban spy station..

How certain are you of that 5890 kHz freq? V02, M08, and SK01 all have used both 5883 and 5898 (and 5882 and 5897 for M08 when the TX was in LSB mode) but as far as I know they have never been confirmed to be on 5890.

Yes, they have been reported a few times on 5890, but my suspicion is that those few (about 3) were incorrect frequency reports, just as the occasional 5880, 5885, 5895 and 5900 are.

Generally the errors are caused when a person using a radio that tunes in say 5 kHz steps tunes in a station, and reports it, that does not lie on a 5 kHz step. For example, if V02 is transmitting on 5898 but the radio a person is using can only display a frequency of either 5895 or 5900 that person will most likely pick the one that sounds best and report it as the tuned frequency. Reporting the 5898 transmission of V02/M08/SK01 as 5900 is fairly frequent because of this. This erroneous reporting is especially frequent when you combine the fact that determining the true center frequency of an AM signal by ear can be difficult and many casual numbers listeners are SWLs used to finding broadcast stations on even 5 kHz increments. So that even when a radio can tune in 1 kHz steps (or smaller) it is still common to misreport the frequency.

An example shown here:
Numbers Station, Spanish, V02a, April 05, 2011, 0801 UTC, 5898 kHz AM - YouTube
In that video you might notice that at 1:10 into the run time of the video I intentionally tune to 5900 kHz instead of the correct frequency of 5898. Because tuning “off” like that puts the low side Link 11 interference out of the IF bandwidth the station actually “sounds” better when tuned to 5900 in the AM mode. Without the visual indication of the carrier on the waterfall display a person might be tempted to report the frequency, incorrectly, as 5900 kHz and the mode as AM.

T!
 

midnightcowboy

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
You read database of spynumbers, token. Two posters egistered 5.9, 5.88, 5.83 in spynumbers database this morning 4 am with identical "Atencion...12349 3456 etc. Who else would have done that but Cuba..
 

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,491
Reaction score
734
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
You read database of spynumbers, token. Two posters egistered 5.9, 5.88, 5.83 in spynumbers database this morning 4 am with identical "Atencion...12349 3456 etc. Who else would have done that but Cuba..

I believe you are misunderstanding what I was saying.

I do not doubting that the reported V02 (and M08 and SK01) stations are out of Cuba. I do not doubting that when you hear “Atencion XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX” that you are hearing V02.

What I was asking was how sure you were of the 5900 kHz frequency you reported, instead of the frequency it should actually have been on, 5898 kHz. I then explained how the 5898 kHz (5.898 MHz) frequency is sometime incorrectly reported as 5900 kHz. (5.90 MHz). This incorrect reporting of frequency happens several times a year.

When people are reporting 5900 kHz (5.900 MHz) for V02/M08/SK01 they are most often incorrectly reporting a transmission that is actually on 5898 kHz. And when people report 5880 kHz (5.880 MHz) for V02/M08/SK01 they are most often incorrectly reporting a transmission that is actually on 5883 kHz.

Checking the spynumbers.com database ( Numbers Database Search Form ), as you suggested, I find no V02 entries for this morning (August 12, 2011 UTC, but I also checked August 11 UTC), on any frequency. Most surely there were V02 transmissions in the last 24 hours, I heard several myself, but most do not get reported by anyone.

The most recent entry for V02 that I see in the Spynumbers database is for August 10, 2011. Looking at the entry (DB ID 104190) I assume it is yours since the location is the same as your location. The next most recent was August 3, 2011, by the same person.

There are some guidelines when reporting numbers stations to spynumbers.com (noted at the top of the data entry page), and these guidelines are a good idea for reporting in most forums including here:

- Report frequency in kHz, not in MHz. It is nearly universal to report HF (shortwave) frequencies in kHz, and the spynumbers database says specifically to enter the frequency in kHz. Since it sorts on these frequencies if you enter 5.9 and everyone else enters it as 5900 it will not sort your data correctly. HF frequencies often need to be tuned to the 1 kHz step (or smaller), so even if you report it in MHz you need to include 3 decimal places, ie 5.900 or 5.989, not just one or two like 5.9 or 5.90. 5.900 MHz is the same as 5900 kHz, but 5.9 MHz is assumed to be 5900 kHz, since the last two digits are not defined.

- Confirm the frequency of a station, don’t just go with what “sounds” best to your ear. This can mean using a technique called “zero beat” to confirm an AM stations freq. If your radio only tunes in 5 kHz steps always question if the station is truly on a 5 kHz step or not. Broadcast stations often are, numbers stations and utility stations often are not.

- Report dates and times in UTC. When no time is given the database assume 0000 UTC, and when you give a local time on a forum how is a person reading that time supposed to know what local time is for you, and how that applies to local time for him? Radio reception reports are done, by convention, in UTC for both date and time. It is also a good idea to include the date in any comments you make about days, for example, saying “this morning” can be misleading as not everyone’s mornings are the same around the World. Saying “morning of August 12” or “on August 12” is much more clear and will lead to fewer misunderstandings.

- If you report a station in a specific mode, such as LSB or USB, make sure you check other modes so that you can exclude them. If you can hear and understand a station in both LSB and USB it is not in either, but must be in DSB or in AM mode. A station that is in AM can be easily understood in both LSB and USB, but reporting it as LSB or USB would be incorrect and misleading to others. V02, for example, is almost always in AM. It has had “error” transmissions in both USB and LSB, but those are the exception, not the rule.

T!
 

Token

Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2010
Messages
2,491
Reaction score
734
Location
Mojave Desert, California, USA
midnightcowboy, if you are the person in Toronto who posted three V02a reports to the spynumbers DB, two early in the month and one on the 10th, I have fixed your entries, changing the "5.9" you put in the frequency field to "5900", so they will now show up in a search.

I left them 5900, but if you think they may have been 5898 instead I can fix that for you also.

T!
 

k9rzz

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
3,162
Reaction score
3
Location
Milwaukee, WI
I've been tuning around the past few days, but haven't been hearing anything interesting until this afternoon. Way below WWV on 15Mhz, I could hear Russia's RWM on 14,996khz (RST 559) which only comes in here about 10 - 20% of the time. Always a good indicator of above average conditions on whichever freq. you hear them here in North America.

Going up the band, I came across 15,345khz with a horrendous heterodyne made from two off frequency stations mixing together. Flipping to SSB and nailing down each frequency, they turned out being Argentina vs Morocco! Very cool. Argentina played their interval signal which identified them, and then the NASWA spreadsheet identified SNRT Idha'a Al-WaTaniya, Nador, Morocco in ARabic (*NEW!)
So, including WWV and WWVH on 15Mhz, I heard 5 continents spanning the whole sunlit side of Earth in the span of 20 minutes. Very cool again.

Rig Icom IC-756 and inverted V wire peaking @ 70 ft.


2145z 14,496.0khz RWM Moscow Time RST 559 Always a good indicator of condx into EU. when heard.
2150z 15344.2khz RAE Argentina in SPanish 43543 hvy qrm (het + slop) from Morocco. Nice interval sig at 2155z though. Best in USB.
2150z 15345.15khz SNRT Idha'a Al-WaTaniya, Nador Morocco in ARabic (*NEW!) In AM mode, it's just a heavy het on 15,345 and hard to pick either station out. Best on USB.
2200z 15540.0khz Radio Nederland World Wide via ?? with new interval signal and prog. in Dutch. SINPO 55545
2202z 15560.0khz Radio Australia English. Good sigs SINPO 34543
 
Last edited:

k9rzz

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
3,162
Reaction score
3
Location
Milwaukee, WI
What's the diff RTV Marocaine (AOKI) vs SNRT Idha'a Al-WaTaniya (EIBI) ?- same freqs and times from Morocco.
 

woebbers

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
Location
Lewes Delaware
15580Khz at 1840utc VOA

During a recent thunder storm I decided to turn on the radio <foolish I Know but i was bored>....The Holy Father was loud and clear on 15610khz so as i scanned off as I did I heard a tweet at 15580Khz...after some database searches I came up with VOA from Botswana Africa. I never logged this one before so I was excited. I cant brag about the signal because it was barely readable about an s-5 and noise is s-4.5. If i didnt have ear phones on I dont think i would have heard it.

Sal
 

ridgescan

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,778
Reaction score
275
Location
San Francisco, Ca.
During a recent thunder storm I decided to turn on the radio <foolish I Know but i was bored>....The Holy Father was loud and clear on 15610khz so as i scanned off as I did I heard a tweet at 15580Khz...after some database searches I came up with VOA from Botswana Africa. I never logged this one before so I was excited. I cant brag about the signal because it was barely readable about an s-5 and noise is s-4.5. If i didnt have ear phones on I dont think i would have heard it.

Sal
Sal I missed this-that's a nice DX for daytime! I haven't had luck here lately catching the Africas in the daytime. My path there for the last few weeks has dropped a bit. So I say that's a tough one you got.
Try 6145khz in the 03-0400utc hour (may be a bit late for you-what-11pm?) the BBC out of Meyerton.
 

woebbers

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
257
Reaction score
1
Location
Lewes Delaware
Im gonna try and catch that tonite Ridge....My windows have been weird lately. Today a 5.9 earthquake here on the east coast.....

Sal
 

ridgescan

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,778
Reaction score
275
Location
San Francisco, Ca.
Im gonna try and catch that tonite Ridge....My windows have been weird lately. Today a 5.9 earthquake here on the east coast.....

Sal
I tried it last night Sal and it was slamming in here:)
Hey SW listeners I don't know about you but conditions here are very nice last couple days. I caught this Madagascar DX just now this morning

Voice Of America-Madagascar - YouTube

looks like my path to the Africas is back.
 

ridgescan

Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
4,778
Reaction score
275
Location
San Francisco, Ca.
2100 utc hour-For those of you who may have your HF rigs handy-I am getting a phenominal copy of 15640 DeutschWelle out of Kigali, Rwanda at a very reliable s9 with +10 peaks.with very nice voice. In my experience, I am led to believe that DW runs transmitters far superior to most others from that area of the world including VOA.

Also try Radio Kuwait on 17550khz coming in at s7-s9 good voice
 
Last edited:

k9rzz

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
3,162
Reaction score
3
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Is that grey line? Had phenomenal grey line into Western Siberia on 20 meters last night ~ 0200z. Heard two Russians, one on CW one on Phone with superb signals - normally don't hear those guys at all. Interestingly, however, Voice of North Korea 15,180khz, was way down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top