- Joined
- Dec 19, 2002
- Messages
- 2,458
Personally, I find reply codes and speed ups most useful and interesting. There is nothing more satisfying than hearing a distant stolen vehicle transponder breaking the squelch on my Motorola receiver, tracking down the approximate location and turning it into the police. The LoJack receivers installed in police vehicles actually suffer from RF overload much easier than professional radio receivers in RF rich environments which gives those using a professional radio receiver an advantage when it comes to tracking down stolen vehicles from a distance. A professional radio receiver can detect faint LoJack signals miles away in the distance which are not strong enough to even begin to be decoded by the LoJack receivers installed in police vehicles. I remember when the local LoJack liason made a company paid visit to me. One of the questions he asked was how I was finding the vehicles and turning them into the police. This happened shortly after I turned in a LoJack to the Denver police that could only be detected within a one block radius and which was not responding to tower speed up commands. I think the antenna must have been severed on the LoJack transponder and I can only assume they must have been looking for that vehicle for quite some time. Possibly the battery may have been nearly dead as well in the LoJack transponder.
...
My point was meant to be that I still think those are not being properly parsed. Although the current parsing you are doing is certainly useful, there are things about it that do not make sense (but do not affect its usefulness). I think if properly parsed, they would make more sense on paper.