LTrunk and Optocom

Status
Not open for further replies.

KD4YGG

Active Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 30, 2001
Messages
2,043
Reaction score
47
Have gotten a couple of off-thread emails regarding the Optocom and settings I'm using, so here goes (the Optocom I'm using is bit-banger equipped if that makes a difference):

- Use the DB9 connector
- In the LTRUNK command line, designate DSR pin
- In the LTRUNK command line, also designate INVERT

That's it, except for your personal settings for COM port, system type file, output file, etc.

I haven't used it on a Multi-Net system, only Passport.

73's
KD4YGG
 

gmitch

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
156
Reaction score
12
Location
Salem, OR
KD4YGG said:
Have gotten a couple of off-thread emails regarding the Optocom and settings I'm using, so here goes (the Optocom I'm using is bit-banger equipped if that makes a difference):

- Use the DB9 connector
- In the LTRUNK command line, designate DSR pin
- In the LTRUNK command line, also designate INVERT

That's it, except for your personal settings for COM port, system type file, output file, etc.

I haven't used it on a Multi-Net system, only Passport.

73's
KD4YGG

I am an Optocom user and program writer (LTRfind). I am wondering what results you are getting. The Optocom has a built-in slicer but it does not filter out >150 Hz which would be best. Could you post some logs?
 

KD4YGG

Active Member
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 30, 2001
Messages
2,043
Reaction score
47
Glenn

I'm getting a lot of inconsistent data during actual voice transmissions when modulation is occurring - a testament to the fact that the data slicer on the Optocom isn't filtering out everything we need.

During periods where no modulation occurs, I get a lot of clean data.

Currently only using LTRUNK for Passport systems - have used your LTRFind program in the past with great success and will continue to do so for straight LTR.

KD4YGG
 

gmitch

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
156
Reaction score
12
Location
Salem, OR
I have not tried Ltrunk yet because I thought the unfiltered data would be too noisy. I will try it on some idle channels and see what happens. LTRfind has always had problems logging idle channels because of the short duration of the data burst. Also, Ltrunk may do a better job overall because it is using the checksum and I don't think the Optocom does.
 

DaveIN

Founders Curmudgen
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
6,514
Reaction score
5
Location
West Michigan
I was about to post a request for info on using the Optocom with LTRTracker. Glad I did the search first.

I'll try the Optocom first, but it sounds like I'll need that Sub-audible slicer after all.

Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top