elk2370bruce said:Any towns that have MDT's have them tied ito their own local system. You're not gonna just dial them up on the scanner and play them on your TV or laptop. If you gotta ask how, you're not gonna do it. Legality is should be of great concern to you as well.
ob123 said:Does anyone know any frequencies for central NJ that are used for the MDT's? And are the legal to veiw, what kind of stuff do you need for it?thanks....
ob123 said:...... I am wondering if I should just forget the whole thing? I was just wanted to know a little about them.....
Joseph11 said:I don't believe it's illegal to monitor them as long as they're not encrypted. There's also a program (MDT Monitor) for decoding systems that use MDC-4800.
Some companies will exert tremendous political pressure for an agency to make an example out of someone who catches a flaw in their systems - in Cheek's case, discovering that a very expensive system (which is now obsolete) was engineered without encryption. That's a very big oops in the manufacturing community. Most of these systems have been replaced by the next generation of equipment that either runs hardware or software encryption end-to-end. A while back there was talk in the industry that the legacy systems were retrofitted with encryption making it officially illegal to monitor, as per the ECPA. That also made these systems pointless to attempt to decode. As Gill points out, despite being a very intelligent and talented guy, Cheek's last days were made miserable.n4voxgill said:Bill Cheek who was one of the early pioneers of scanning died while under charges in federal court of decoding MDT in violation of federal law. He has been mentioned on this site often and you can google him.
I do see potential value - say you wanted to monitor one certain town but your radio locks up on the channel because of "noise." Is that noise someone's MDT system that you can't fix and would have to use a receiver with PL, or is that something else that you can try to fix, like RFI? If it were in the database, someone has already isolated it and it would save time for the next person who heard it. For that reason alone, that would be helpful.ctrabs74 said:Not to belabor the issue, but what reason would there be to post the MDT freqs in the first place, considering there's no way to monitor anything via a scanner? Is it just for reference or are there other reasons?