I'm a little confused by what you wrote ("I guess if there was a group I had to leave out in terms of where I currently listen the most now, and where I want to listen in the future, it would be the 400MHZ range.")
The OmniX covers 118-137, 148-175 & 225-900 MHz. Unless I'm completely confused, "225-900 mHz" does INCLUDE the 400 mHz range you're looking for. What makes it necessary to "leave out" the 400 mHz range?
Regarding where to put the antenna: Do you have a handheld scanner? Take it up on the roof to both locations and check your favorite frequencies. Pick the spot where the majority of them have the best strength.... and then mount your antenna there.
Yes your confusion is legitimate. I went back and read what I wrote before I went to bed last night and realized I had misinterpreted. Did not feel like correcting the post at that time. TRUE, the OMNI X should work in the 400 MHZ range.
In reference to others replies above, it looks like there is some legitimate debate here between the Discone and the OMNI X. I am still thinking this through. Points are well made on both sides.
In terms of one reply above, the idea of taking a portable and getting on the roof to test is a great idea. However, my scanner (BC355N) is not portable.
I am leaning towards getting a higher mast and going with the present J Pole location but getting the antenna (whichever one is chosen) higher, but then in turn, being able to use only 40 to 50 ft. of feed line, vs. 75ft. which will be required on the other side of the roof. If I don't like it there, I can simply put the J Pole back up at that location (now fed with better RG8 vs. the present RG6 line) and move the new antenna to the other side and then go buy a 75 ft. run of RG8 or better to run to the scanner. It does run the cost up 35.00 more dollars possibly, but I can budget that down the road if needed.
Now. Omni X or Discone.....................Omni X or Discone.