• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

MXt275 or MXt575

Delivers1234

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2016
Messages
320
Reaction score
8
Location
Modesto, CA
I have a 2025 Honda Trailsport. is the mxt575 overkill? I like the head with the buttons due to not drilling on the roof. i can place it in the rear, though I am not sure if I need a new power line from the battery. Not sure if the 575 can handle the rear 12-volt cigarette lighter.

any options.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,226
Reaction score
32,702
Location
United States
I have a 2025 Honda Trailsport. is the mxt575 overkill? I like the head with the buttons due to not drilling on the roof.

Not sure I follow you here.

The hand held control head makes installation easier in many newer cars. One of the drawbacks, however, is that the handset has a small speaker in it, so it can be difficult to hear, and audio quality may suffer at higher levels. Adding an external speaker helps a bunch.

By "not drilling the roof" are you referring to the antenna mount, or figuring out where to mount the radio in the vehicle?

i can place it in the rear, though I am not sure if I need a new power line from the battery. Not sure if the 575 can handle the rear 12-volt cigarette lighter.

any options.

575 is a 50 watt radio and you'd want a power feed capable of at least 15 amps. From what I can find, the 12 volt outlet in that vehicle is rated at 15 amps maximum.
But keep in mind that power wiring is bundled in with all the other vehicle wiring harnesses and it becomes a common source for noise infiltration to the radio.

I've always found it better to run a dedicated power feed for my radios. It really prevents a lot of headaches.
 

Delivers1234

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2016
Messages
320
Reaction score
8
Location
Modesto, CA
Yes. I would use the magnet mount and not a drilled nmo.

So I guess it’s better to mount the body in the front under driver side then wire antenna to rear. If I have the 575 I would still need to go through the fire wall.

So the 575 is stronger. Is it over kill for recreational use?
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,226
Reaction score
32,702
Location
United States
Yes. I would use the magnet mount and not a drilled nmo.

OK, got it.

Question becomes how you get coax in the vehicle. If you are routing through the door, then ideally you want to use a door that rarely gets opened/closed to reduce damage to the coax.

So I guess it’s better to mount the body in the front under driver side then wire antenna to rear. If I have the 575 I would still need to go through the fire wall.

Seems like the handset to RF deck cable is pretty short. You'd need an extension if you mount it in the rear. Mounting under one of the front seats would save you a few bucks on RJ-45 cable and make your power run a bit easier.

So the 575 is stronger. Is it over kill for recreational use?

RF power isn't a 1:1 ratio to range.
There's a big price jump between the two models, and in reality it won't make a huge difference in range. As you know, the antenna would make more difference.
If it was me, and budget was tight, I'd get the lower power radio and put more money into the antenna.

Around our area most of the repeaters are up high in the mountains, so try to reach out long range isn't necessary. Simplex distances are usually limited more by terrain than power. But you know best what you need.
 

03msc

RF is RF
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 3, 2011
Messages
4,199
Reaction score
1,276
Location
The Natural State
I understand the apprehension of drilling in the roof, but it really is a cleaner and more efficient way of installing an antenna...especially if this is a permanent install or will be used often. No ugly cables to see, etc. A 1/4 wave UHF antenna for GMRS is very short; it would hardly be noticeable. Better performance, cleaner look, all those good things. Doesn't devalue the vehicle, either.
 

nokones

Newbie
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 19, 2011
Messages
1,103
Reaction score
570
Location
Sun City West, AZ
Not sure I follow you here.

The hand held control head makes installation easier in many newer cars. One of the drawbacks, however, is that the handset has a small speaker in it, so it can be difficult to hear, and audio quality may suffer at higher levels. Adding an external speaker helps a bunch.

By "not drilling the roof" are you referring to the antenna mount, or figuring out where to mount the radio in the vehicle?



575 is a 50 watt radio and you'd want a power feed capable of at least 15 amps. From what I can find, the 12 volt outlet in that vehicle is rated at 15 amps maximum.
But keep in mind that power wiring is bundled in with all the other vehicle wiring harnesses and it becomes a common source for noise infiltration to the radio.

I've always found it better to run a dedicated power feed for my radios. It really prevents a lot of headaches.
To the OP, please note that he referred to "the power lead to the battery". That means the "Red +" lead only to the battery. The "Black - Ground Lead" should be grounded to a "factory chassis grounding point" to prevent any vehicle electrical components causing noise being introduced into the radio.

Most accessory power outlets are only 10 watts and some may be 15 watts. You should refer to the factory owners manual. The MXT575 will pull anywhere from 6.5 watts to 8.5 watts when transmitting. As stated above, you should connect to at least a 15 watt circuit, but the battery would be best and do not splice into any existing fused circuit.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
27,226
Reaction score
32,702
Location
United States
Most accessory power outlets are only 10 watts and some may be 15 watts. You should refer to the factory owners manual. The MXT575 will pull anywhere from 6.5 watts to 8.5 watts when transmitting. As stated above, you should connect to at least a 15 watt circuit, but the battery would be best and do not splice into any existing fused circuit.

Amps, not watts.

I looked up his vehicle, 15 amp accessory sockets, not that I'd use them for radios.
 

jeepsandradios

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Jul 29, 2012
Messages
2,458
Reaction score
1,806
Location
East of the Mississippi
Define what you plan to use the radio for. I run the 275 in all my jeeps and work truck. Never had a need for the extra power and I use on repeaters and simplex. If there are good local repeaters there is no need for 50 watts.
 

Delivers1234

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2016
Messages
320
Reaction score
8
Location
Modesto, CA
Hi sorry. I now have a Honda trailsport ‘25. Wife wants no drilling.

It also has a sun roof. I am using the mag mount (ebay) with a laird antenna 1/4 wave.

Thank you for the advice.
 

KF0NYL

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2023
Messages
251
Reaction score
214
I will second what @mmckenna said.

You definitely want to run the radio's power lead straight to the battery and the radio's ground to a good chassis ground. Connecting any two way radio to the vehicle wiring harness inside can and will cause RF interference issues with the radio and/or vehicle.

A 50 watt radio will help get the signal through obstacles such as heavy foliage but it won't get you any more range with all things being equal concerning the antenna and coax cables. At least that has been my experience with both mobile and base setups.

Heavy foliage and UHF (70cm and GMRS) do not play well together. My local club has a 2m, 70cm, and GMRS repeater on a 1000 foot tall tower. The 2m and 70cm antennas are at 900 feet while the GMRS antennas are at 400-450 feet. I have the same exact dead spots with the 70cm and GMRS repeaters. Some of the dead spots are where there are a lot of tall pine and cedar trees close to the road.
 

K6GBW

Member
Joined
May 29, 2016
Messages
950
Reaction score
1,645
Location
Montebello, CA
The difference between a 25 watt VHF radio and a 50 watt is marginal at best. You're antenna is much more important. In a max range simplex situation using the same antenna the difference between the two power levels would be less than a mile. Honestly, I run my mobiles defaulted to low power (about 12 watts), 99 percent of the time and it's all I need.
 
Top