daleduke17 said:
Is storm tracking really that competitive in Oklahoma for the media? (Don't make fun of me for that, I'm from Illinois). Do the stations show live footage via break-ins, or just during the news?
Just wondering.
At least as early as about 1970, television coverage of severe weather in Oklahoma City has been very competitive. Yes, it is that competitive!
For a long time, in Oklahoma City, the fight between the TV stations was who had the most sophisticated weather radar - then the most sophisticated Doppler weather radar. The current "must have" is a helicopter with a very stable very long range video camera - and a pilot capable of watching the weather, providing on air commentary, and flying the ship simultaneously.
At first the stations would be careful to interrupt programming and make sure to cut out before the commercials. Then they started interrupting commercials when necessary.
Now, on days when tornadic weather is possible, the continuous, and I mean continuous (h-o-u-r-s) coverage begins when the first thunderstorm appears on radar and continues without pause until the storms leave the coverage area of the stations. Yesterday, Oklahoma City stations were covering storms in the northeastern part of the state in an area in the Tulsa viewing area, perhaps on the assumption that people in those areas were watching via streaming video on the internet.
To me, it is often captivating entertainment that beats the programming that has been interrupted. You really have to witness the spectacle in order to appreciate it. It's a lot like the beginning to end coverage of police pursuits on cable news.
Edit: I want to make sure that I conveyed that I am describing
on-air coverage pre-empting
all programming