Yeah, I'm with ya on that. I'll consider one used in a few years and after a generation or two go by. Until then? My SDS100 and SDS200 are suiting me perfectly.unless it decrypts I guess my scanning days are numbered
Yeah, I'm with ya on that. I'll consider one used in a few years and after a generation or two go by. Until then? My SDS100 and SDS200 are suiting me perfectly.unless it decrypts I guess my scanning days are numbered
Trust me, you're not...I'm the only guy I know that's downwardly mobile, big time, so it's over for me.
unless it decrypts I guess my scanning days are numbered
We've seen a couple videos from Mr. Houk on this. He compared reception of a weather channel between the 100 & 150, with a noticeable improvement in reception on the 150.So, bottom line, at the end of the day, performance-wise when it comes to reception, is there expected to be any real difference in receive between the 100 and 150?
Originally, when the SDS series were introduced, there was no need for TETRA and dPMR, outside of the EU and Australia, and even then, TETRA wasn't part of the plan. Now, with several TETRA systems in use, it's become desirable. Still no official word about its implementation, but the matter of dPMR is different: the code is in the firmware, as it's already available in overseas models of the SDS series, but the licensing hasn't been approved yet for North American models, yet, even though thanks to the flood of cheap Chinese radios, and tourists from Europe bringing in their radios, dPMR can be heard here, especially by some hams. It's because of this, that I believe there's a good enough reason to work on licensing the dPMR keys in the US & Canada, now.The whole TETRA discussion many pages back got me really excited. For the 1K price tag, if TETRA was included even as a separate key unlock purchase, I would consider the 150.
Oh yeah... I'm literally flat broke.Trust me, you're not...
And a Keurig. (All you waffle fans out there - sorry, not sorry!)I'll wait for the SDS500... 500 KHz to 1.5 GHz coverage, true SSB, and the simulcast distortion correction on HF to clean up HFGCS audio when they use the whole network to broadcast.
And dual screens. And more knobs and buttons.
It's a 3.5 hour drive one way, but next time my son and I plan a railfanning trip down there, I'll PM you and you're on!...Defeats the purpose of spotlighting simulcast hash. But fair point—scan mode vid could be a fun follow-up. I have no ETA for my next trip to CBus, a steak dinner does sound nice if anyone in the area is offering?
Biggest reason for any one of the Uniden SDS scanners is LSM. Possibly a Unication G series pager.This is what I want to know, would the 150 be better than the top notch conventional radio for analog?
Chinese, uniden 125, what ever is the best I don't know. How could it be? What could they possibly put in the 150 that would be any better at receive. For p25 I could understand that but like someone said earlier it was demonstrated on noaa that there was a great improvement. I have a hard time getting a distant ems channel that that my 125, tid radio h3 and a couple other radios including a rspduo that doesn't do any better than my sds100. There pretty much equal. One thing I was wondering that might help would be that they put noise reduction in the 150. One of these days I want to try the nvidia broadcast application that cuts out the background static connected to my sds 100 to see if it would make a distant channel comfortable too listen too. It does work somewhat good on hf. Anyhow just curious as to what anyone might know about the 150 that could make the receive that much better than the 100. If it does I'm gonna have to figure out the hardest part, getting my wife to believe it's made of gold and nobody knows it. Or giving her free access to a buying spree on temu.