NJTA\GSP

Status
Not open for further replies.

robertpearsall

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Messages
378
Location
Edison, NJ
The conventional was dismissed this is new for a trunked system granted on 4\4\14 the old thrend is about the conventional.
 

elias1988

Station 44 Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Messages
1,779
Location
Seaside Heights,NJ
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 7_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Mobile/11D167 Safari/9537.53)

OK so it was probably dismissed in favor of trunking but it still lists the same frequencies.....
 

N2ZGE

Active Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
1,820
Location
Roselle Park, NJ
At the bottom of the letter in the link just provided, I wonder if the reference to "secured Phase 1 and 2 radios", mean encrypted?
 

GM

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
933
I believe that is in reference to securing the necessary funding for the project.
 

phillydjdan

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
1,687
No, the wording of the letter does not in any way indicate the planned use of encryption. To further that, the mention of "phase 1" and "phase 2" do not mean they are going to use a P25 Phase 1 or P25 Phase 2 system. The word phase has many different contexts, as does the word secure.

Sent using Android ForumReader app
 

nosoup4u

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Messages
1,922
Location
High Bridge, NJ
I really don't understand why they are hell bent on running with their own systems, vs using the state system. Do they really have that many employee's/radios to make it more cost effective?
 

CqDx

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 15, 2003
Messages
932
Location
US
Cost effectiveness is never the sole factor when new systems are built, there are many folks out there who does not like sharing infrastructure and like to own their own toys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top