No Freq Table for calls upload

Status
Not open for further replies.

scottb908

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
195
Reaction score
12
Location
Terryville CT
I am trying to get the SDR Trunk set up to feed calls from a conventional system. Whenever there's activity I am seeing the stream being uploaded to the standard streams but calls doesn't report any activity. in the logs I am seeing an error [Broadcastify Calls API upload URL Request failed [1 no-freq-table-entry-for-upload]. I don't see any place to add freq information specific to calls.
 

DSheirer

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 15, 2010
Messages
628
Reaction score
175
Location
Fulton, NY
The API is providing an error response code: 1 no-freq-table-entry-for-upload

What does that mean?
 

blantonl

Founder and CEO
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 9, 2000
Messages
11,594
Reaction score
6,820
Location
Dallas, TX
It means that there isn't a slot to frequency lookup table defined for the node on our end. The frequency lookup table maps the slot assignments on the node provider's end to specific frequency entries in the RRDB.

Looking at this person's nodes, it appears they are probably trying to send to the wrong node ID. He should be sending to node ID 3260 but he's probably trying to send to his old node 3254 which no longer has a freq table because we moved it to 3260 for him when he decided to switch from Trunk Recorder to SDR Trunk.
 

scottb908

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
195
Reaction score
12
Location
Terryville CT
I did delete the old config and added the new one. From what i can tell should be hitting the new node? Even after the fresh entries still get that message. Restarted the app several times in case something was cached
Capture.PNG
 
Last edited:

scottb908

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
195
Reaction score
12
Location
Terryville CT

@blantonl Good Evening, Is there anything else that we can check on the back end. I have complete deleted and rebuild the SDR Trunk config and I am still getting the api error. As far as I can tell I have everything configured as expected. Api key starting with - 7888cce and system ID 3260​

 

blantonl

Founder and CEO
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 9, 2000
Messages
11,594
Reaction score
6,820
Location
Dallas, TX
Everything looks fine on our end. For some reason it looks like you're sending to the wrong node.
 

scottb908

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
195
Reaction score
12
Location
Terryville CT
Everything looks fine on our end. For some reason it looks like you're sending to the wrong node.
I just did a packet capture off the wire and it does appear that I am sending to the right node.


POST /call-upload HTTP/1.1

Connection: Upgrade, HTTP2-Settings

Content-Length: 760

Host: api.broadcastify.com

HTTP2-Settings: AAEAAEAAAAIAAAABAAMAAABkAAQBAAAAAAUAAEAA

Upgrade: h2c

Accept: */*

Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=--sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk

User-Agent: sdrtrunk



----sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk

Content-Disposition: form-data; name="apiKey"



7888cce7*************

----sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk

Content-Disposition: form-data; name="systemId"



3260

----sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk

Content-Disposition: form-data; name="callDuration"



4.032

----sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk

Content-Disposition: form-data; name="ts"



1711680328

----sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk

Content-Disposition: form-data; name="tg"



100

----sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk

Content-Disposition: form-data; name="src"



0

----sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk

Content-Disposition: form-data; name="freq"



453.5625

----sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk

Content-Disposition: form-data; name="enc"



mp3

----sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk-sdrtrunk--

HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Content-Length: 32

Connection: close

Server: awselb/2.0

Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:45:34 GMT

X-Cache: Miss from cloudfront

Via: 1.1 bfc4676044fcc4c0c8e705c71ca51fea.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)

X-Amz-Cf-Pop: IAD55-P5

X-Amz-Cf-Id: gg5WfkNiXEUqoKfxdH3yqGCQinZUc21rLr7WewIuydFyJHN7rv8Olg==



1 No-Freq-Table-Entry-For-Upload
 

blantonl

Founder and CEO
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 9, 2000
Messages
11,594
Reaction score
6,820
Location
Dallas, TX
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="tg"
100

There's your problem. For some reason you're sending 100 instead of 1 for the slot or entry ID or whatever it's called in SDRTrunk.
 

blantonl

Founder and CEO
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 9, 2000
Messages
11,594
Reaction score
6,820
Location
Dallas, TX
Screenshot 2024-03-29 at 8.27.06 AM.png
I'm guessing this is where you've run into trouble because you've assigned "100" as the talkgroup ID when Broadcastify calls is expecting "1" as the entry ID.

Remember, for conventional channels we have to map your conventional channels to frequencies in the RadioReference database. When you submitted your application for the node, you gave us a list of frequencies you planned on capturing. And they are in order from N+1

Screenshot 2024-03-29 at 8.30.42 AM.png
 

scottb908

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
195
Reaction score
12
Location
Terryville CT
View attachment 159182
I'm guessing this is where you've run into trouble because you've assigned "100" as the talkgroup ID when Broadcastify calls is expecting "1" as the entry ID.

Remember, for conventional channels we have to map your conventional channels to frequencies in the RadioReference database. When you submitted your application for the node, you gave us a list of frequencies you planned on capturing. And they are in order from N+1

View attachment 159183
I am all set and running. Maybe a small suggestion in the application page for Sdrtrunk conventional mention that the order submitted need to match the talk group numbers. I knew they were in an order, thought that was just for the channel configuration. Also the screenshot from sdr says 1-6500. I had each one as a different talk group, just didn’t make the connection that it was tied to the order n+1 to the application listing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top