JamesO
Member
Errant RF fields can be crazy. A long time ago we installed a repeater at a fire station. Its sensitivity was very poor. I did some researching and found that the frequency the repeater listened to, was the same frequency used for one of the cable television channels (back when it was all analog).
Since cable TV is a "closed system" where all the signal is contained in the cable itself, that should not be a problem. But if there is a leak in the cable system, such as a bad connection somewhere, that does become a problem.
I contacted the engineering folks at the cable company. After having my sanity questioned, I got them to briefly disable the channel I thought was the problem. Lo and behold, our repeater started receiving very well. When they turned the channel back on, the repeater went back to being deaf. After the cable folks saw this for themselves, and saying "I ain't never saw this before", they decided to offset the frequency of the offending channel. It was easier for them to do that than to try to find the source(s) of the leak.
Cable plants are supposed to be pretty RF tight, what leaks out can also leak in!.
Many cable companies have a "leakage" carrier, a FM modulated warble channel at a pretty high level that easily allows the cable company to "sniff" out leaks. Many cable companies drive the system with a receiver and antenna on a vehicle and it allows them to pretty easily locate leakage that is not intermittent/temperature dependent.
But then again, we are talking about cable companies and cable technicians. The way they solve all problems is more power, remove attenuation rather than looking at a plant loss diagram and having trunk line benchmark measurements and looking for and finding the 10dB loss in the cable plant!!