Goto.... cont'd
Sorry, there is no thread by that name that I see.
If you design the software similiar to what I did with my alphatag editor then ALL the information you desire is ALREADY in arrays in the software and can be referenced by using the system, group, channel index arrays, so for me to add a GOTO button to that software it is a walk in the park since ALL the data is already stored in arrays. So when I get the index I can display ALL the settings for the channel desired when I send the unit to it. Using Dynamic memory you have to realize there are numerous pointers, indexes and data commands to get all the info you want then store it ALL in arrays whether you think you need it or not. Then when you decide you want to do something like a GOTO button 80% of your work is already done since you designed it from the beginning. The 996T is FULLY computer programmable even more so than the 796 especially since we can now control the squelch and volume controls!
I am looking forward to the 996 control thread when it shows up.
Sorry, there is no thread by that name that I see.
If you design the software similiar to what I did with my alphatag editor then ALL the information you desire is ALREADY in arrays in the software and can be referenced by using the system, group, channel index arrays, so for me to add a GOTO button to that software it is a walk in the park since ALL the data is already stored in arrays. So when I get the index I can display ALL the settings for the channel desired when I send the unit to it. Using Dynamic memory you have to realize there are numerous pointers, indexes and data commands to get all the info you want then store it ALL in arrays whether you think you need it or not. Then when you decide you want to do something like a GOTO button 80% of your work is already done since you designed it from the beginning. The 996T is FULLY computer programmable even more so than the 796 especially since we can now control the squelch and volume controls!
I am looking forward to the 996 control thread when it shows up.
wm8s said:I started a thread for '996 computer control and programming discussions. [We should continue this there.] I suggested QSH as the only thing close in that thread and also pointed out that it will only for for conventional. And even at that, it is hardly a replacement for "goto-a-channel." For example, it lacks alpha tags or any other channel-specific info (like which system or group the channel's in, its lockout status, etc.) The 785 was not really very computer-controllable, and sadly the 996 is even less so. ;^(
The only way I can think of to really go to a channel is to command enough knob-twirls and button-smushes to "dial" the the appropriate system/channel, but even that will be tough, given that dialing through systems is in quick-key order (and in undefined order for multiple systems with the same SQK).