• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

One Frequency Trunking

Status
Not open for further replies.

Thorny41587

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Location
Holland, OH
Is it possible to only have one frequency for a trunking system? And would that work in a scanner with just one frequency? Thanks
 

troymail

Silent Key
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
9,981
Reaction score
32
Location
Supply (Lockwood Inlet area), NC
well, you'd need at least two freqs - one for the
control channel and one for communications...
but that really doesn't make allot of sense....

I guess I could see a three channel system where
two communications freqs (plus 1 control channel)
could be shared amongst numerous users - first come
first serve.

I think the fewest freqs I've seen in a trunked system
was 4 (1 CC and 3 voice channels)
 

RFGUY

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2004
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Location
Somewhere in Nevada
Yes it is!
In EDACS it is called SCAT or Single Channel Autonomous Trunking.
The Control Channel also acts as the working channel for that system.
 

jf222

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Location
Silver Creek, NY
Yes - Uniden - 250D/785D and probably others

When you set the bank to this type of Edacs it mutes the data and allows you to hear only the voice. this is a ONE frequency system that only allows one user (company) to be active at a time. Other users (companies) do not hear the transmissions.
 

DaveH

Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2001
Messages
3,287
Reaction score
56
Location
Ottawa, Ont.
The Motorola 1-channel system is called VoC (voice over control). I've never heard one but they do exist.

The only scanners that track EDACS SCATS are the Unidens from the 250/785 on, not the 780, and none of the RS scanners including digital ones.

There are 1-channel LTR systems, that don't actually trunk i.e. go to any other channel. It is more of a conventional system with LTR to separate the user groups (like CTCSS/DCS), but has the option of upgrade to trunking.

Dave
 

Thorny41587

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Location
Holland, OH
RE:

Wouldn't that be a a lot cheaper than a trunking system?

Just have lots of user on the same freqs with different PL's EX:
460.475 - 173.8 Sheriff
460.475 - 192.8 EMS...
 

W4KRR

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 1, 2001
Messages
3,662
Reaction score
282
Location
Coconut Creek
troymail said:
I think the fewest freqs I've seen in a trunked system
was 4 (1 CC and 3 voice channels)

In south Florida, the city of Deerfield Beach has a three channel Motorola trunked system for fire/rescue. They have like seven or eight talkgroups. It is being changed to become site 2 of Broward County's Smartzone system, and will likely get additional frequencies.
 

mdulrich

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 9, 2002
Messages
1,628
Reaction score
16
Location
Van Wert, Ohio
Re: RE:

Thorny41587 said:
Wouldn't that be a a lot cheaper than a trunking system?

Just have lots of user on the same freqs with different PL's EX:
460.475 - 173.8 Sheriff
460.475 - 192.8 EMS...

If two users tried to transmit on your system they would cause interference to each other. With it being trunked one of the users would get a busy indication on his radio and would be locked out of the system.

Mike
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
15,072
Reaction score
1,886
Location
Indianapolis, IN
With different PL/DPL's there would not be interference on the repeater.... except for the fact that there is no repeater made that is set up for multiple tones. You would need multiple repeaters utilizing different tones. Take a look at Lincoln County, MS's EOC set up... One freq for output- 155.8950 MHz.... Two repeaters, one North, one South... each with the same inputs.... But different tones. And for large multi county districts for MS's Dept of Forestry, and Agriculture.... One freq for the repeaters... up to two repeaters per county in each district... a different tone on each repeater.

But for those agencies that can do the trunking route, thats the smartest route to go.
 

DaveH

Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2001
Messages
3,287
Reaction score
56
Location
Ottawa, Ont.
milf said:
With different PL/DPL's there would not be interference on the repeater.... except for the fact that there is no repeater made that is set up for multiple tones. You would need multiple repeaters utilizing different tones.

Not correct. There are lots of multi-user commercial repeaters which allow multiple tones. Otherwise they could not support multiple users. The repeater either passes them through, or receives and regenerates them. In the latter case, they can prohibit unauthorized users coming on with a tone that is not allocated to legit users in the system, a fairly low-level defense.

Dave
 

Thorny41587

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Location
Holland, OH
re:

On that last note, I cannot say I have ever heard someone who was not supposed to be transmitting on the LCS Frequency. Do these types of things happen? Is it even possible to program a freq and a PL and make it hit a public safety repeater?
 

mdulrich

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 9, 2002
Messages
1,628
Reaction score
16
Location
Van Wert, Ohio
milf said:
With different PL/DPL's there would not be interference on the repeater

I'm sorry, but different PL/DPLs do not magically allow multiple simultaneous conversations on one frequency. You can if the two agencies are far removed so that the capture effect happens, but then you only hear one conversation. All PL/DPL does is keep your receiver closed if the correct tone isn't heard. Once your reciever opens up you are subject to interference.

If you could put multiple agencies on the same frequency with different PL/DPLs and not have interference, there would be no need to have more than one frequency nationwide.

Mike
 

Thorny41587

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Location
Holland, OH
re:

I see you're in Lima... do you listen to the city PD? If so, are they direct? Or on repeaters? I was down there about a year ago and 154.8 sounded direct.
 

mdulrich

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
Dec 9, 2002
Messages
1,628
Reaction score
16
Location
Van Wert, Ohio
Lima PD, Lima FD, Shawnee Twp. FD, Elida FD and Allen County Sheriff are all running repeaters.

Mike
 

Thorny41587

Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
Location
Holland, OH
On that last note, I cannot say I have ever heard someone who was not supposed to be transmitting on the LCS Frequency. Do these types of things happen? Is it even possible to program a freq and a PL and make it hit a public safety repeater?
 

gr8amp

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2003
Messages
129
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, MA
milf said:
.... except for the fact that there is no repeater made that is set up for multiple tones. You would need multiple repeaters utilizing different tones.

WHAT!?!? No repeater made that is setup for multiple tones? What leads you to make this bold assumption?
 
N

N_Jay

Guest
gr8amp said:
milf said:
.... except for the fact that there is no repeater made that is set up for multiple tones. You would need multiple repeaters utilizing different tones.

WHAT!?!? No repeater made that is setup for multiple tones? What leads you to make this bold assumption?

LOL, Because MILF "Knows what he knows". :roll:

Problem is; He doesn't know what he doesn'y know! :wink:

At lease he is willing to learn. :D
OK, no flames, just having fun.

Multi-PL/DPL repeaters have been around fpor a VERY long time.
They were called "Community Repeaters" back before Trunking.
They did what one channel trunking does in a simple way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top